Standard Vampires (Better than..

by bigt032000 on 10 January 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

B/R Vampires - 2012/Innistrad

Deck Tags

  • Tribal

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,707 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0047120

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Standard Vampires (Better than Al's)

I don't think that sorin markov is needed is this deck because of the 3 swamps needed to cast him. Your deck should already have defeated your opponent or be close to doing so and sorin just doesn't provide any help because his best ability with probably be useless when you cast him. Also stensia bloodhall is not a good land to have because its ability cost five man to do 2 damage. I use to have both stensia and sorin in my vampire deck and they slowed my deck down alot. I would take out sorin markov and stensia bloodhall and out in 2 blood seekers because when ever a creature enters the battlefireld under your opponents control they lose a life.

1
Posted 10 January 2012 at 16:18

Permalink

Yeah your probably right, I just threw Sorin in for flavor he's not really that useful. I'll probably just take out that bloodhall for another swamp, the bloodhall is definitely the worst of the innistrad lands.

0
Posted 10 January 2012 at 16:29

Permalink