The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
:P
This deck has been viewed 1,345 times.
You need burn spells. You only draw cards if YOU hurt the swan, not if your opponent does. Plus, you need walls of some kind to stall until you get enough lands out to play your cascaders
Permalink
Zaplight, do u even know how the decks works?? U ont need burn cuz of seismic ssault, and walls are useless cuz u never want to cascade into them
This seems very vulnerable, is all (yes, i was mistaken about the way this worked at first, but this point still stands). You can't do anything until the third turn at best, and that's if you were lucky enough to draw Seismic Assault. Really, any creature-based deck would have you pinned. And in case you didn't know, Cryptic, when you discard a card to Seismic Assault, it only triggers one. After you use up the lands in your hand, you're dealing 2 damage a turn. You can consider this an opinion, but in my opinion, this deck would get beaten very easily.
I swear, people like you Zap make me want to .... LICK A HORSE! Whenenver you use a land in your hand to shoot it at the Swans, you get 2 cards. Odds are, after you mill yourself you ARE going to end up with 10 lands in your hands theoreticaly.
Yes, I understand that, but it's really based on luck.There are only 4 swans in the deck, so you're more relying on the Cascaders, and by the time you get a cascade card out, you'd have already lost a good chunk of life against most decks. I understand your point, but it just seems too risky for me, sorry if you don't like my opinion (i'm not trying to be unreasonable, really D= sorry if i'm coming across that way)
Excuse me, this deck isnt based on luck! It actually is a Type 2 Deck that sees tons of play, you obviously do not know about competitive play.
If you want to see tournament quality, look at my decks and decks just like this one. Those are what are going to take you to a Top 4 finish or 1st place. This deck gets a +1, even though people play this because guess what, its a GOOD DECK.
I do not see how anyone can argue with the power of this deck, considering it pretty much RULED the Type 2 domain AND it still is seeing play even more because of the addition of Cascade. This was a deck with the dredge land from Future Site BEFORE Cascade was even printed, so this deck has now survived through more than 1 block now and doesnt look like it will be slowing down until Swans is out of Type 2.