Incinerating Infection

by CZAR_Dan on 30 April 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Green, Black, Arrifact Infect deck.

Deck Tags

  • Theme

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 756 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0012016

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Incinerating Infection

Be careful with infect creatures that cost more than 3, while they do have a place, they often fill early hands with too much weight to get started. With that said, look towards Blight Mamba in place of Putrefax and consider adding some pump. Cards like Groundswell, GIant Growth, and Vines of Vastwood can really set the pace for a turn 3 swing for 8 poison counters (which can be turn 2 when Glistener Elf gets released with NP).

Also, the planeswalkers feel 'thrown in for the sake of being there' adds. While each one of them are great, their placement in the deck withdraws from cards that could really exploit the infect philosophy.

I welcome any comments or criticism you can offer on any of the decks I have posted here on the site (just click on my name to see the deck list). Thanks in advance!

0
Posted 30 April 2011 at 17:46

Permalink

I can see the Garruk staying in there for his -4 ability but imo liliana and sorin dont fit in there. The hunters feast also seems a little bit expensive for a 6 life gain. Unlike rusted I'd say keep the putrefax as it can be a very major game changer. Also I'm not a bit fan of contagious nim I'd probably say drop it for plague stingers.

0
Posted 04 May 2011 at 01:03

Permalink