Lich's Poisoned Mirror

by DedWards on 02 February 2010

Main Deck (62 cards)


Sorceries (7)


Instants (12)

Artifacts (7)


Enchantments (4)


Land (20)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Idea is to Donate Lich's Mirror to opponent and get 10 poison counters on him/her. This will put him/her in an endless loop, resulting in a draw. I don't intend on winning with this. I've been wanting to make a weird deck for a while, and here it is.

Deck Tags

  • Other...

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,914 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

035800

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Lich's Poisoned Mirror

remember that the mirror gets shuffled back in, so the mirror wont work. I don't see the point in it's existence in this deck

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 09:59

Permalink

The mirror only shuffles cards you own back, so it won't get shuffled back. This is covered in the rules for this card.

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 10:25

Permalink

oh. then wow.

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 12:22

Permalink

W00T Infinite Draw-ending combos. +1

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 16:12

Permalink

lol. I can't quite call it brilliant, but you get a +1 anyway.

0
Posted 03 February 2010 at 03:17

Permalink

I know it's not "brilliant", but it was a random idea I had. Thanks for the +1's anyways

0
Posted 03 February 2010 at 03:22

Permalink

+3 but are you sure about it not getting shuffled because it says "ALL permanents you own" right and you kinda own the mirror

0
Posted 27 November 2010 at 19:32

Permalink

sorry didnt read the description
lol

0
Posted 27 November 2010 at 19:33

Permalink