The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Casual golgari aggro
discard creature, scavenge creature, attack opponent, win game
This deck has been viewed 829 times.
any suggestions for cards i can add to make this deck a little less lame?
Permalink
While i understand this was made from a fat pack, the first thing you should be concerning yourself with is consistency. So maybe try to cut down on how many singles of cards you have to try and control which cards you will draw into. Relying on getting that 1 card out of 60 isn't nearly as good as relying on one of the 4 cards in 60 if that makes sense. :)
yeah i get that, i don't have too many playsets that would fit in this deck so i just tried to go with a variety of small threats for early pressure and a couple of bombs for the late game if i make it that far. I haven't run into any real consistency problems in playtesting. I've only had a chance to play about 10 games with it but i haven't really found myself hoping to draw a specific card. I do agree that slimming things down and cutting out most of the unnecessary creatures and spells would make things run quite a bit smoother.
I like the deck, lots of attack and combo possibilities, and with "oak street innkeeper" you can attack and not have to worry about spells.I also like the massive amount of creatures, and with the scavenge cards you have you could easily over power some opponents. So I think this deck could work well.
recently updated this deck with some more scavengers and more consistent mana base, as well as an asceticism for a bit of creature protection. anyone have any thoughts on improving this deck further?