The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
mana
This deck has been viewed 2,268 times.
Take a look at my landfall here, maybe you could get some ideas. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=152929
Permalink
Seems like a good deck... instead of running only 2 explore, why not run 4? it would make a good combo when you have the oracle out plus you get to draw. everyone knows that card advantage is very crucial... also try running 24 land instead 25. i don't really think you need that many land. instead of the woodcrasher put in Avenger of Zendikar that way you have a bigger threat and it increases the number of creature you have per land, which can buy you some time if you need it... just some things you could consider. Other than that i like the concept of the deck. Check out my Landfall Deck and tell me what you think about it. Good Luck. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=173170
well i dont think Avenger of Zendikar will be beter then woodcrasher becouse i can sumon him on my 4th turn with help of Lotus Cobra. so i wont have a lot of tokens this way but his damage will be insane if befer attack him ill use Khalni Heart Expedition and few sacrifise lands. And about lands you see you got 24 and 60 total cards in deck(that is 40% chance) then i got 63 and 25 land (39.9% chance)
oh, i see what you're saying. i didn't take that under consideration... well, all in all i think its still a good deck... what did you think about the explore comment?
Well i've played this deck with my friend and i think i'll use you advise and swap 2 rapmants for 2 explorers