Modern Grixis Control (No AV)

by FritoFloyd on 08 December 2017

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 921 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0322080

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Modern Grixis Control (No AV)

Why no AV?

0
Posted 25 December 2017 at 18:03

Permalink

Why would you run AV when you could run THE CARD ADVANTAGE POWERHOUSE KNOWN AS SEARCH FOR AZCANTA!?

In all seriousness though, AV is just too inconsistent for this deck. While a turn 1 AV is an amazing play, it just hurts so badly to draw it later in the game. On top of that, sometimes resolving an AV doesn't get you what you need. This build decides to get rid of the random draw three and opt for the selective draw from Azcanta to avoid drawing dead cards. Additionally, by switching to Azcanta we can run less than four cards in what was the AV slot (just 2 Azcanta), and we can use this for more valuable cards in our mainboard.

Basically, I took the AV version that I was running (it had 1 Azcanta), and cut the 4 AV for the following:
-Countersquall
-Kolaghan's Ccommand
-Azcanta #2
-Damnation

I personally think that I would rather have more live, valuable draws in my deck than AV. Don't get me wrong, I like AV for its high ceiling, but I cannot stand it's super low floor.

1
Posted 28 December 2017 at 04:46

Permalink

A very, very nice explanation. I have not played that much Grixis control in modern, not enough to be able to argue on the statistics of AV, but I can definitely see how this version of the deck would be better.
Although, how do you fare against AV decks?

0
Posted 28 December 2017 at 17:08

Permalink

I will say that it definitely hurts if I am on the draw and my opponent leads on an AV. However, this is partially why I have added a third countersquall. I hopefully will have one in my hand or in the grave to snap back in response to AV. It's a challenging counter-war to win since they don't have to pay mana to initiate it, but we still can win it.

This is the nature of Ancestral Vision though, and this is why I chose not to play it in my deck. The card is strong on turn one, but is really weak from turn three onward. It will always hurt to see AV turn one, but my deck will always have a chance at countering the AV.

0
Posted 02 January 2018 at 21:59

Permalink