The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Feel the burn from the deck of pure fire. No creatures, just anger! Now double all that pain with Furnace of Rath to make sure your opponent is extra crispy. :D
This deck has been viewed 1,907 times.
No pyroclasm? I'm a little disappointed.
Permalink
It may seem silly, but 70 is a bit much in my opinion. Try to whittle it down to 60, it'll be more fun and more effective.
i'd take out barbed lightning altogether. take out blaze for banefire. sizzle should be in your sideboard. i'd takeout furnace of rath for fire servant. take out dragon's claw for shrine of burning rage. and chandra nalaar should be chandra ablaze.
or the firebrand, quicker + built in reverb
ablaze would allow him to replay everything he already did. it's a game winner it's much more effective as a finisher than firebrand.
It is, but with the cost of ablaze and the nature of a deck like this you would hope that the game doesn't go long enough to get ablaze out + enough counters to do her big ability.
StrategicMuffinExhausted is right i should have pyroclasm. devm52768 i agree with u on takeing it down to 60 im still working the details on that kungfutrooper786 i do think barbed lightning was a bad idea but i used furnace of rath instead of fire servant b/c i want this deck creatureless i know it double all dmg but i should be able to burn anything that comes out away. hoxe firebrand isnt bad but at least with seething song+nalaar+furnace of rath= turn 5 win
now its been reworked this should work much better