Standard Vampires

by Julian on 16 November 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (8 cards)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Wanting to play this deck this weekend and cant quite work out the sideboard. Any advice would be greatly appreciated both on sideboard and main deck. Thanks.

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 849 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

004800

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Standard Vampires

take out lacerator add captivating vampire, put feast of blood into sideboard, i personally am not a fan of bloodthrone for just a deck like this granted it has its possibilities.... 2x nighthawk for 2x blood throne i often make decks similar to this but the problem is you run out of card advantage... higher CMC spells sort of take care of this and account for later game. if i were you id be tempted to add demon of deaths gate possibly for blade of the blood chief... (i know, it is such a bad ass card, especially with nighthawk...) night hawk should definitely be in here though i think....

0
Posted 16 November 2010 at 23:57

Permalink

Thanks for the advice, im not sure i agree with you on the Nighthawk, it is an amazing creature...but for three mana kinda skrews up the whole "disciple aspect" of the deck. On turn three id like to be able to sac 2-3 creatures to a Kalastria and have three mana open to drain life for 4-6 and than swing in for 4-6 as well. I will play test it some more with the Nighthawks in and see how it goes. With the seers I dont think i'll have a problem with card advantage, I will at least be able to stack the deck a little in my favor.

0
Posted 17 November 2010 at 01:06

Permalink

EDIT: realized I got the play sequence a little backwards... "Thanks for the advice, im not sure i agree with you on the Nighthawk, it is an amazing creature, yes...but for three mana kinda skrews up the whole "disciple aspect" of the deck. On turn three id like to be able Swing in for 6-12 and then sac 2-3 creatures to a Bloodthrone and have three mana open to drain life for 4-6 with Kalastria. I will play test it some more with the Nighthawks in and see how it goes. With the seers I dont think i'll have a problem with card advantage, I will at least be able to stack the deck a little in my favor.

0
Posted 17 November 2010 at 01:10

Permalink