not tokin'

by kamikazi1000 on 03 March 2012

Main Deck (61 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)


Instants (4)

Artifacts (3)


Enchantments (3)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Spellbombs mb are legit. At it's worst, it's a 2 mana draw spell, which isn't bad at all. It just has the added bonus of blowing up someones gy.

This set is all about flashback and general gy play. So why not come prepared?

Just saying...

Deck Tags

  • Other...

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

9
Likes

This deck has been viewed 9,214 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

2001900

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for not tokin'

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:13

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:21

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:25

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:28

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:30

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:33

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:35

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:40

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:46

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:48

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:49

Permalink

this deck is real

0
Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:52

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:54

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:56

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 18:58

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 19:01

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 19:04

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 March 2012 at 19:06

Permalink

It's more real. What does it need? More baseball references....

0
Posted 06 March 2012 at 21:01

Permalink

There are some mean combos in this deck. Put in some tutory goodness?

0
Posted 06 March 2012 at 21:13

Permalink

3 comments, 60 likes.

Right.

3
Posted 07 March 2012 at 01:12

Permalink

Yeah, seem fishy....

1
Posted 07 March 2012 at 04:06

Permalink

hey jayden.

kamakazi, why do you people put decks like this on the front page, if it doesn't get there itself people don't want it there and its wasting space that could be used for decks that actually are awesome, please delete this deck

2
Posted 07 March 2012 at 04:11

Permalink

Agreed! please delete this deck!

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 20:46

Permalink

I think nihil spellbomb belongs in the sideboard, it's a waste of a mana (not drawing, cause that's mostly offset by the draw ability), and it's useless unless it's against a deck built around reanimation abilities, and those exist, but they're not very widely played. Great card in a sideboard, but don't main deck it

0
Posted 07 March 2012 at 02:10

Permalink

Needs Mirran Crusaders

0
Posted 07 March 2012 at 03:10

Permalink

I don't think Mirran Crusader is, in general, necessary. But I don't see the need for Phyrexian Crusader. Same for Priests of Norn. I'd much rather see Mirran Crusader and maybe a Hero of Bladehold. Ultimately, a sub-theme of infect just doesn't make sense.

0
Posted 10 March 2012 at 05:19

Permalink

Actually, there is no subtheme of infect. Those guys are blockers.

0
Posted 10 March 2012 at 17:31

Permalink

manofwar51 has deleted this comment.

Posted 07 March 2012 at 03:46

Permalink

ForestFire7765 has deleted this comment.

Posted 07 March 2012 at 03:47

Permalink

I didn't even have decks labeled as finished and they both ended up on the main page yesterday. Shit, this one only has 54 cards in it and it ended up on the front page.

So if theres a problem, its not my fucking problem. I havent officially posted a deck in months. Almost all of my recent decks are STILL labeled as works in progress. I don't love these decks so i don't run these decks. Right now I'm running a modified version of my red black and green.

Don't be so quick to accuse me of shit. If I wanted anyones opinions or comments on these decks I would have posted them to begin with. I'm not deleting my decks because of someone else's s screw up.

0
Posted 07 March 2012 at 17:16

Permalink

I'm not actually accusing you of anything, I was just saying 3 comments and 60 likes isn't so much even suspicious...it's just weird. I don't think the most dedicated booster/troll/whatever would go through the trouble to give a deck so many likes without comments...So more than anything, it's just bizarre =/

0
Posted 07 March 2012 at 21:44

Permalink

well SOMEONE obviously hit like and refresh a bunch... it's not really bizarre, rather blatant

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 00:51

Permalink

It doesn't work that way, majician. Try it out for yourself. How many times can you like a deck? If it's more than once, I'll give you a shiny gold watch (not really) and a brand new carton of eggs.

1
Posted 08 March 2012 at 01:13

Permalink

I think the reason people were so quick to accuse you of having an alt-boosted deck is because in the last few weeks there's been somewhat 5 or so decks in upcoming or front page due to proxy accounts. Sry if I offended you in my above post =[

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 01:57

Permalink

Nahh, something is going on in the vault... kamikazi's 2 decks, clancy's deck, Ethan's deck, and thewuest's deck all have this same problem of insane amount of likes and no comments (actually thewuest has -1 comments --__--) so something has happening internally on the vault... there is no alt-boosting involved

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 02:19

Permalink

It does work that way, not with deck likes, but with comment likes. Can I get some eggs though, an omelet sounds really good! Anyway, it does seem like there is actually something happening on the vault right now - I'm not accusing you specifically of boosting, but it is very plausible that someone is using the comment like bug.

I guess not many people know (knew) about it. Watch how many decks start hitting the front page with 1 comment now haha

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 10:43

Permalink

Yep, just checked, it works. Fuck a gold watch but seriously, can I get some eggs!?!

1
Posted 08 March 2012 at 10:45

Permalink

kamakazi, can you explain why the spellbomb main?

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 01:59

Permalink

It's my idea of a dirty trick. I get to blow up the gy of the half of my meta that uses gy based strategies and draw a card for bonus. Then I guess it just turned into a black draw card. In the second game I would probably side them out for the undying evil, which is another fun trick to play, because nobody expects it. That's a lot of my strategy in deck building.... confusing the shit out of the opponent. I never bring the same deck to fnm twice. It's boring. :)

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 02:52

Permalink

i have another question why tragic slip dismember is way better! and don't correct me i play legacy everyone runs dismember cause it is consistent no chance it does what it says it does. so run a kinda standard playable card? being tragic slip. or run a LEGACY! card Dismember. the choice is simple

0
Posted 13 March 2012 at 19:31

Permalink

Dear MTGVault Community,

Please look at this deck... actually an advertisement for decks. I want to get this to the front page so we can see more decks hit the front page.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=307378

Thank you for your support,

~TheyCallMeTim...

0
Posted 08 March 2012 at 14:49

Permalink

patchkey has deleted this comment.

Posted 08 March 2012 at 16:07

Permalink

they call me "shameless."

1
Posted 08 March 2012 at 16:09

Permalink

this advertising thing is smart!

0
Posted 13 March 2012 at 19:32

Permalink

ForestFire7765 has deleted this comment.

Posted 08 March 2012 at 20:51

Permalink

ForestFire7765 has deleted this comment.

Posted 08 March 2012 at 20:53

Permalink