The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
sorry about the twilight reference. lol. but heres a vamp deck also check out team jacob! http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=79342
This deck has been viewed 23,735 times.
Why does everyone insist upon that useless card? Feast of Blood = THE WORST card ever. It is way too conditional on gameplay. If your opponent is knocking off your vampires with burn, counters, removal, kill spells, then you have a dead card or four in your hand. Replace it with Disfigures, Doom Blades, whatever, but get rid of em. Your mana curve is super high as well, I would try to cut it down. You also need to fix the lands....16 x catacombs, lol. Finally, you get the ***** slap of the day for naming it Team Edward. Twilight and all the tweens that follow it need to go die in a ditch somewhere. lol.
Permalink
feast of blood is great with bloodghast....and messed up on lands. lol. thanks for the point-out. and i hate twilight too!!! but i thought it was funny.
Again though, I path, journey, O-Ring, w/e ur Bloodghasts....dead cards. I still say they are faulty and useless. Its your deck though,if you feel it works, but I would not run them. And lol, still hate the Twilight reference, but w/e.
lol feast of blood isnt that bad of a card i got 4 in my vamp deck and it helps me to slap ur shit around lmao
I prefer to keep two Feast of Blood spells in my Vampire deck because I need it to fuel card draws through Necropotence. The prerequisite two creatures is a bit unfortunate, though.
I concer. Maybe replace two of the F.O.B with DBlades or something. But Feast of Blood is still pretty good. Stop with the twilight references as well, please.
i think the twilight references are hilarious. and i've always loved using vampires
I dont know much about vampires but have you ever tried Anowon, the Ruin Sage?
i added 2 and cut one kalitas to help the mana curve slightly
if you have mono black why do you still have the flatts and catacombs....they just deal 1 damage to you to find a swamp that would be better already in the deck in place of the flatts and catacombs....just a suggestion
they help thin out the deck so that i can get more draws that arent lands....
if you dont understand the concept behind fetch lands then you will prob lose. its like the only thing right this guy did in making this deck.
first off i would like to say this: your deck name is a rip off of mine. my deck was posted 2 months prior to this monstrosity. secondly my deck is more refined and functions the way a vampire deck should, where are your blade of the bloodchiefs? see the ORIGINAL team edward here : http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=61671
Dude, Take a chill pill. His deck is not tournament playable but he should be able to go 3-2 at FNM. No need to rip him for that.
Swifty has deleted this comment.
I also looked at your deck and his is alot better built than yours. You have 19 lands and one of the shittiest budget vamps deck I have seen in a while. It sucks, period. Don't insult people if they are your superior at what you are insulting them at.
did you respond by deleting your "superior" vampire deck?
Nice deck, but guul draz vampire would really lower the mana curve and strengthen your deck
Not a bad deck but you still kind of have to many high mana creatures in this deck. Vampire decks are usually a faster paced kind of game and definately do not hold out in the long run. Malakir Bloodwitch is a good card but its more of a sideboard card usually included when you know your verusing white decks. Or Malakir Bloodwitch+Buried Alive+Living Death is a pretty nifty combo i like to do. Corrput though im not fond of that card just costs too much for not that good of a benefit i personally recommend exsanguinate its a good single or multi player card. Or im sure there are other cards out there that you can replace it with. I run a vampire deck although its called "The Vampire Diaries" ha ha, im sorry to say but i love the series but anyways check it out if you like: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=235511
i would suggest dropping corrupt. if you want to gain life and cost them a creature then maybe consuming vapors. but i would just add go for the throats and doom blades. i would drop 2 blood witches and add 2 captivating vampires. also vampire lacerater is a great card for inflicting quick damage. its cost is well worth the benefit. also blade of the bloodchief is just a great card in vampire decks. almost half of your non land cards cost 4 or more lands and you have zero 1 drops. prob need to speed it up for good decks
also hexmage should really be sideboarded cause it doesnt have any function in your deck and wont against a lot of decks
Maybe use Bloodlord of Vaasgoth instead of the Hexmages.
1. really consider dark rit. a t2 nocturnus in dirty or t1 nighthawk 2. make a sideboard, and then put your hexmage in the sideboard its only good against certain decks 3. the mana curve is not really that good no 1 drops? and also if you insist on having a mana curve such as that card draw and dark rituals will help. 4. 3 corrupt isnt worth it you cant use them early game maybe 1 if any
add a Sorin's vengeance they really work good with Sorin
why is this getting so many likes? it's garbage
Because people are leaving pointless comments... like this one.
comments =/= likes. L2read
Maybe you should figure out that Comments = Likes, at least here. A comment generates likes, lol.
You need some lower-cost stuff, or maybe add some Dark Rituals in place of Doom Blade. Check out my new B/W deck: Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=281835
I dont see the point in the non-basic lands, considering u have only black creatures on the deck, try replacing some for swamps and maybe some and other spells for dark rituals / 1 and 2 mana vampires like Pulse Tracker to make the deck faster. Also drop 1-2 corrupts. Please check and coment my monogreen creature deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=281537
the fetch lands is one of the best parts of the deck. its called deck thinning. it increase the chances that you will get a land early game and a non land late game essentially
Sorry to say that but i dont see anything on this deck to be on front page. Just a lot of vampires from the same Collection (Block) and voila. What is the secret in the deck? None. It is a great deck but dont need all this comments. Guys lets comment in more cool decks, please. Ok now that i said that you guys can burn me :)
Just like everyone else, I'm confused as to why this is on front page. the mana curve is definitely out of whack. Maybe look around at other vamp decks to figure out a good idea. PS: If anyone's interested, I have a R/B with a W splash vampire deck set up and it's pretty much ready for when the new Sorin comes along for 2012 standard along with that splash of white to counter things like humans (#1 enemy of my vampire deck)
Almost forgot the link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=279755
might think about adding a couple Undiscovered Paradise land cards to maximize the land fall effect from Bloodghast. just a thought. idea taken from SureWhyNot
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=220021 can anyone help with my vampire deck> any suggestions?
Pootiekiller has deleted this comment.
One drops are absolutely essential in Vampire Decks, so I would suggest Pulse Trackers (definite 4 of) and some sort of hand disruption (if you can afford, Thoughseize, if not Despise will be functional enough).
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=280410
PLEASE ! can someone answer me, why in a mono B deck some ppl use verdant catacombs, and cards like that ? wasnt better put just another swamp ?
see posts above about deck thinning. you are removing two cards from your deck instead of one making the odds that you dont have a dead draw especially late game. you know when you need a card and you draw a land
put birds of paradise and camel in there... at least we have something different on the deck
2 more swamps. very good deck anyways
I think this deck would benefit from a little more focus. There are small aggro vampires, big chunky vampires with late-game effects, and control cards. You need to choose a direction, because the deck will work better with one specific focus rather than good cards that belong in different deck archetypes. The other thing is you need to drop some high cost cards. You have 13 cards over 4 mana, and chances are you will only be able to play 1 every game but there will be 3 in your hand, meaning you have a lot of dead card draw. Decide which high cost cards work best with your strategy and just keep them. Please take a look at my aggro slivers deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=282699
Nice vampire deck. If you get a chance take a look at mine and let me know your thoughts. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=215704
You need to add Rakish Heir. You can't have a deck called Team Edward without some gay looking vampires
vampires in magic have usually had one thing that makes them nasty; speed. get them out fast. have cards like pulse tracker, bloodghast, vampire nighthawk. people usually see bloodghasts and respond stupidly. burn an O ring it, kill it, block it, let it hit you; it doesn't matter. its designed to make your opponent either waste a spell or take a hit. the pulse tracker is horribly underrated. on turn 2 your swinging for 2. the nighthawk? dear God, who doesnt love a 2/3 flying lifelink deathtouch?! all of these cards work in two ways, get them to burn their spells fast so your other bigger vamps can come out and you can hit them with those; or let the speed speak for itself. hit them hard and hit them fast. thats what a vampire deck is supposed to do.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=151945
also, a mono black legacy deck without dark ritual??? Find room for those.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=287388 awesome deck dude. Just made my first edh deck. looking for some feedback thanks.
I had never heard of deck thinning with fetch lands before this so I was pretty curious. Anyway I don't know the math behind it and I have no experience with deck thinning as I said but I thought this was an interesting article. http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/print.asp?ID=3096. It pretty much says that a game never lasts long enough (and I would say especially for a vampire deck) for the deck thinning to actually increase your chances of pulling a spell over a non-needed land, add in the cost to your life total and it is definitely a poor choice.
You can look at my deck sorin, lord of tokens?