The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
o yea cant touch this the deck focusses on getting out predatory urge and then killing in one attack
This deck has been viewed 1,148 times.
wow, you really cant do much to stop that
Permalink
Lands? Only 4 1-cost and 2 2-cost spells? What do you do if they Fog, or Counter your key spells? My suggestion would be to focus more on the early game; green DOES have a lot of fatties, but if you want to win in just one big sweep, you'll probably want to pump out a lot of creatures so that there's less you need to protect... Avoid Fate's great for protecting your key cards (predatory urge), and Bant Charm can take care of counters and fogs at the cost of a small splash for blue mana. Gutteral Response works similarly, but ONLY against blue. As always, just IMHO. Feel free to ignore me.
Lands uther then that the mana curve is to slow.
And make it 60 cards.
The first thing I would do is play test this deck to figure out which cards work best together. The trouble with having only one or two of many different things is lack of consistency. Also why don't you have more Aether Vial? It's the most important card in here. This is the one that makes sure you can't get creatures out consistently. I see you've left room for 23 lands. This is probably enough but it might be more prudent to use elves and other mana-producing creatures instead. This would give you a few more early-turn creatures to prevent you from getting too far behind. A good idea overall, you just need to refine it.
thank you for all of your feedback. its all good constructive criticism