mederski88

89 Decks, 102 Comments, 15 Reputation

thanks man

0
Posted 11 May 2013 at 23:18 in reply to #351154 on Sorin, Lord of Tokens

Permalink

I'm trying to keep mana curve to a minimum but it is a good card. Thanks for the input.

0
Posted 11 May 2013 at 21:30 in reply to #351106 on Sorin, Lord of Tokens

Permalink

I thought so too ;). Thanks for the comment.

0
Posted 11 May 2013 at 04:30 in reply to #350938 on The Night Keepers

Permalink

I'm guessing he is trying to keep it standard which would be a bad idea to add in Dark Ritual. It is a great card but is not standard. I'm not too fond of Heartless summoning decks but it can work out well for others if that's their play style. If you have a chance please check out and comment on my new decks:
http://www.mtgvault.com/mederski88/decks/the-night-keepers/
http://www.mtgvault.com/mederski88/decks/flight-captain-drogskol/

1
Posted 11 May 2013 at 04:00 in reply to #350926 on Murderball

Permalink

All of those suggestions are good, but does not fit my mass flickering, although Conjurer's Closet would be a nice addition. Thanks for the input and +1 if you like :)

0
Posted 08 May 2013 at 02:34 in reply to #349619 on Flickering For Life

Permalink

Thanks for the inputs so far guys, I am trying to keep it budget but still competitive thats why there is no Jace, and Syncopate is nothing like dissipate and there is no way I would replace it. Sands is a good card but with my mana that I have set for this deck is doesnt fit with it.

0
Posted 19 December 2012 at 08:30 as a comment on WTF Happened to your deck?

Permalink

Hey Poet, sorry but there is no instant messaging or direct contact on this site but I wanted to ask your advice on a deck idea. I want to create a Bruna Enchant Control deck that uses her as the main win condition but can also protect her. I really like her as a whole for a card and was thinking the other day about making a deck but im not sure if I can afford to make it a 3 or 4 color deck and which colors to specificly use. If you have any ideas please let me know. Some of the cards I really want to keep in the idea of this deck are Dramatic Rescue and Righteous Authority. Here is a link to the dual color Bruna experiment deck I made and hope you can shed some light on it for me.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=413882

1
Posted 14 December 2012 at 23:32 as a comment on GeistRider

Permalink

i would wait honestly because when GC comes out you'll be able to tweak your bant to make it that much better.

0
Posted 14 December 2012 at 19:05 in reply to #310302 on Bruna Control

Permalink

Hey man, I would drop 1 Rancor and add a second Sigarda. You have enough enchants to let one go and having a second Sigarda would help. Other than that it looks good.

Check out my new idea for Bruna Control:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=413882

0
Posted 14 December 2012 at 08:12 as a comment on Bant Enchantment Aggro

Permalink

Turn 4-5 Avacyn with Sigarda on the board already allows you to sweep and have a huge advantage. Imagine Loxodon with Rancor's and Ethereal. Can't be countered, can't be sacrificed, can't be destroyed. How bad of a late game it that when you just sweeped with Supreme Verdict and are the only one with creatures left? I'd say this deck would have the upper hand in quite a few situations.

0
Posted 11 December 2012 at 14:00 in reply to #309674 on G/W/U Hexproof Control

Permalink

Imagine turn 4 with 5-6 creatures on the play field on your side. Play Battle Hymn for enough mana to cast Burn at the Stake, tap 4-5 of those creatures for 12-15 damage then cast Reverberate and that's the game. If you dont have BatS in your hand then the same concept goes for Devil's Play and Reverberate.

0
Posted 11 December 2012 at 10:57 in reply to #309661 on Burn at the Stake

Permalink

Replace Unsummon with Cyclonic Rift because CR has eveything Unsummon will never have. You have more than enough draw, take out Augur and put in Delver of Secret. If you are willing to risk running Rewind with it's mana cost I would recommend replacing it with 2 more dissipates or Negate's. Just some ideas to throw your way. Runechanter's would work better in a self mill sorcery deck and I suggested CR because that will be your only full sweep would allow you to do any damage, otherwise your creatures are kinda weak.

Here is my Self Mill token sorcery combo deck that might give you a few ideas:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=405570

0
Posted 10 December 2012 at 20:49 as a comment on Azorius Flash

Permalink

Thanks for the input and Farseek fits in there perfectly!

0
Posted 10 December 2012 at 20:01 in reply to #309445 on G/W/U Hexproof Control

Permalink

Went ahead and switched the two and hopefully I can try it out myself this week.

0
Posted 06 December 2012 at 05:22 in reply to #308486 on +1/+1 Aggro Counters

Permalink

Thanks mate. Glad it did well for ya. I can see the Somberwald helping so more power to ya!

0
Posted 06 December 2012 at 05:19 in reply to #308485 on +1/+1 Aggro Counters

Permalink

I would drop Diregraf, add some Wild Guess to main deck, and maybe a couple of demonic taskmasters to main deck as well.

If you get a chance please check out my R/W/U Gisela Token deck:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=410904

0
Posted 05 December 2012 at 06:48 as a comment on SEM CORAÇÃO/HEARTLESS

Permalink

Thanks for the input, I will see what I can do. As for your posted deck I was one of the first to comment :)

0
Posted 04 December 2012 at 17:51 in reply to #308050 on Predator Lambholt

Permalink

I really like what you got going on here. Only thing I have to suggest is maybe adding Planar Cleansing. Works perfect with exiling your own creatures and works better than Supreme Verdict because it will take out your O-rings. Just an idea.

If you can please check out my revised R/W Gisela Token deck:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=410904

1
Posted 04 December 2012 at 13:49 as a comment on Beat Them Oblivious

Permalink

Unruly Mob is hit and miss in my opinion. Cathars' Crusade is good but is also quite expensive for what im trying to do here and I see this deck performing faster that it would be worth it to add Cathars' Crusade. But why do I have Gisela, right? She is an absolute finisher for this deck. Once she is out my tokens become rediculously strong and defensive. But by that time I would hope to have burned my opponent down with Guttersnipe anyways. Thanks for your input, it is very appreciated.

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 15:18 in reply to #307723 on R/W/U Gisela Revised

Permalink

It could but then I'd be taking away from token generators and guttersnipe at the same time and that is a BIG basis of this deck. Dont get me wrong I agree it could work wonders but im just not feeling it.

0
Posted 03 December 2012 at 14:52 in reply to #307717 on R/W/U Gisela Revised

Permalink

1-20 of 95 items

1 2 3 4 5 Last