[P]Burn Deck V2

by naab007 on 21 September 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Burn Baby Burn

4.10.12: Searing blaze swapped with guttersnipe
27.11.12: replaced curiousity with Coastal Piracy

in the sideboard are alternatives which would fit fairly well in this deck..

Deck Tags

  • Burn

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,454 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0220280

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for [P]Burn Deck V2

i made a deck, this would be one of the few decks that could really hurt me, burn decks are my decks weekness and im trying to fix that, this deck is made pretty well, no lava axe tho? oh well, heres the link to my deck http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=387054 if you have an idea on how to make it better plz tell me :p

0
Posted 22 September 2012 at 04:00

Permalink

Lava axe is indeed a nice spell, but there is very few spells I'd trade for it in this deck..
And as for another sniper, I already removed cinder pyromancers which is the better version of that sniper, due to its inefficiency.

0
Posted 22 September 2012 at 15:05

Permalink

oh, you could also add some prodigal pyromancers to

0
Posted 22 September 2012 at 04:02

Permalink

Pyromancers ascension is pretty nice but I removed it from my deck because the copy that it makes doesn't count as a spell that has been cast, so my dragonauts and gelectrode don't gain the benefit of it. Also I've added lightning greaves, because as soon as gelectrode hits the field it is targeted.
Lol, after hitting someone for over 20 damage in 1 turn I don't get to see my deck run very often anymore. Haven't got to test it since the lighting greaves were added though.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=381580

0
Posted 06 October 2012 at 10:44

Permalink

This play style doesn't fit me very well, but i built it so i'd have an answer against aggro decks my friends play..
Normally I build constructive decks and this deck can be played both constructive and aggressively.

Pyromancer ascension might get swapped out to Furnace of Rath.. but I have to play test it first so I get some clue over how reliant it actually is..

0
Posted 07 October 2012 at 18:23

Permalink

Dude, honestly I would switch out brainstorm, or preordain for counterspell. Works amazingly well with isochron scepter, and you've already got enough draw power with the curiosity and your pingers.

0
Posted 15 October 2012 at 11:35

Permalink

Yea I'll put some counter spells in the sideboard, but unless its a deck with some threat in it, I wouldn't waste a Isochron on a counter spell, it sounds silly that I wont do it, but until my friends play a deck I don't like this is the case..

0
Posted 19 October 2012 at 15:07

Permalink