Counter Productive

by RoughneckBarbarian on 04 January 2010

Main Deck (70 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

It's pretty self-explanatory. Put -1/-1 counters on creatures, then wipe the board to gain control of them with Necroskitter.

Deck Tags

  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 806 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

906264

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Counter Productive

What about Scar?

0
Posted 04 January 2010 at 13:00

Permalink

I think that this deck can be mean... good job +1 from me

0
Posted 04 January 2010 at 13:04

Permalink

No room, Razya. Because I play free for all, I had to focus on putting counters on everything, not just one creature. I originally had plans to splash red for Djinn Illuminatus so that Scar would be more feasible and green for Heartmender so that Knight of Kulrath wouldn't shut me down when Harbinger of Night was out, but things got out of hand.

Any suggestions as to how I could do that would be appreciated.

0
Posted 04 January 2010 at 14:11

Permalink

take out the plague winds (too expensive) put in Everlasting toment, it's cheaper, well themed for this deck and just sound more mean.

0
Posted 04 January 2010 at 16:22

Permalink

here take a look at my -1/-1 counter deck, it doesn't have to od with destroying your opponents stuff but still maybe you could get some ideas

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=37293

0
Posted 04 January 2010 at 16:25

Permalink

I need a board wipe that doesn't take me out to take advantage of Phyrric Revival. It's Plague Wind or nothing.

0
Posted 04 January 2010 at 16:47

Permalink