green/red midrange

by Seth346 on 25 September 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Instants (8)


Planeswalkers (1)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

fun fun fun

Deck Tags

  • Aggro

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

5
Likes

This deck has been viewed 5,753 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0001230

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for green/red midrange

Not a bad deck, here are some of my suggestions.
guttersnipe,: I don't know if you have enough spells to make him useful. I would use wild defiance instead

Electrickery: this card is good as a sideboard if you're facing tokens, but revenge of the hunted could cover that and give you aggro.

Caravan vigil: It's slow to use, unless you have multiples in your hand when a creature dies. that's very restrictive and risky in a aggro deck since you want to win as fast as possible. I would use arbor elf instead to help with mana excel.

Those are my suggestions. If you have a moment can you look and comment on my decks? thanks.

Boros
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=387684

RUG
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=388917

2
Posted 28 September 2012 at 23:16

Permalink

I don't know if I have enough spells that target creatures for wild defiance

1
Posted 29 September 2012 at 02:40

Permalink

Looks good, I think you should put Chandra, the firebrand in it though

1
Posted 29 September 2012 at 02:45

Permalink

I think that I will put a Chandra in this deck, The early game killing of their creatures and doubling rancor or something like that sounds insane

0
Posted 29 September 2012 at 02:51

Permalink

Why have demonmail Hauberk in this deck, or Trepanation Blade?

1
Posted 29 September 2012 at 02:46

Permalink

I feel like Demonmail Hauberk really could be usefull with strangleroot geist, sacking him off to equip to Ash Zealot who hopefully has rancor then swing 8 trample and 3 with geist. Trepanation blade is mostly just for tample damage, and maybe taking some threats out of their deck that they only have a few of

0
Posted 29 September 2012 at 02:52

Permalink

-2 Hauberk -1/2 Traitorous Instinct, +3/4 Rakdos Cackler/Rakdos Shred-Freak/Flinthoof Boar/Wolfir Avenger. Seriously, a 4cmc equipment is NOT fast aggro and you've left out some of the most aggressive creatures in standard right now. And as much as I like Traitorous Instinct, it's still, sadly, a sorcery and thus a bit on the slow side. Better to have them in the sideboard as a surprise against decks with big creatures (read: Armada Wurm, Drogskol Reaver, etc.).

Also, you might want to remove Chandra. She's great in a burn deck, but you really don't have enough targets for her second ability (Rancor isn't one) and her first ability isn't likely to do enough damage by the time she comes out. Switch in more creatures. Remember you want to hit fast and hard as early as possible. ;)

Hope this gives you some ideas!

1
Posted 11 October 2012 at 14:19

Permalink

The hauberk is not as bad as you think i can easily equip 90% of the time increases damage immensly. Traitorous instinct is to take their big creatures swing with them, then sac them off re-equipping or just equipping the hauberk chandra is for board wipes or kill of one costs even double traitorous instinct and on turn 4 swing for 11 dmg (8 trample) undead strangle root ash zealot (rancored) and have hauberk on her

0
Posted 12 October 2012 at 01:19

Permalink

I know what the cards do, I'm just saying the same thing could be done faster. But, whatever floats your boat, I wouldn't presume to insist on changes to a non-competitive deck. And I know enough people who play rogue decks (off-the-beaten-path, not the creature type) in FNM that if it works for ya than it works for ya.

1
Posted 12 October 2012 at 12:57

Permalink

I really like this deck, seems strong. There isn't too much I would change.

1
Posted 16 October 2012 at 17:22

Permalink

what would you change?

0
Posted 19 October 2012 at 03:50

Permalink