T1 Manaless Ichorid

by sur3fir3 on 01 February 2008

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (2)


Sorceries (3)


Land (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Sick little version of Manaless Ichorid. Much more versatility and seems to work well in actual play.

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,898 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

245664

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for T1 Manaless Ichorid

i dont understand how this deck works at all

0
Posted 01 February 2008 at 20:39

Permalink

how is this at all good. i dont understand it

0
Posted 02 February 2008 at 03:04

Permalink

the deck seems really complicated but can go off fast.... very fast with no mana at all.. not the best build i have seen but really close... this is the top deck to beat in the pro tour hollywood... you discard cards cus you have no mana in hand and you dredge to putt brige from below in the garve yard along with narcomeopa.... and dread return... this deck can go off and win withen the first 3 turns pretty much every game.... tormads crypt and ley line of the void.... only answer,,,

0
Posted 02 February 2008 at 03:17

Permalink

This build tries to do too many different things to make it work. This is a bridge deck and manaless ichorid deck and sutured ghoul deck all in one....You should focus on one thing. Perhaps use nether shadows as well? You also have 8 dryad arbors in the deck and you need 4 serum powders since you have to have bazaar in opening hand.

0
Posted 02 February 2008 at 06:39

Permalink

I wondered about the 8 dryad arbors too, but when I counted the cards I realized it must be a site error. The type is a "land creature" so it was listed under creatures and under lands.

0
Posted 03 February 2008 at 00:30

Permalink

Yes nalmar is right it is a site error because of the land and creature type of the card it shows up in both places ... nothing I can do about it :) ... I tend to like a little versatility so that is why it is trying to be 3 decks in one. You are right focusing on just one of the three wins would be much more solid if not a bit more boring :)

0
Posted 05 February 2008 at 00:04

Permalink