Thinker

7 Decks, 191 Comments, 60 Reputation

I put two different quotes up in how this deck works (they can be found in the deck description and how to play). Please do me favor and read them. Thank you.

0
Posted 20 January 2016 at 15:46 in reply to #573134 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Thanks for looking in to that. Also, if you are going to build the deck, do you mind informing me how the deck does? Thanks!

0
Posted 19 January 2016 at 15:33 in reply to #572152 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Tnanks! I'm glad you like it.

0
Posted 16 January 2016 at 19:16 in reply to #571612 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Wish you best of luck and if you don't mind I'd like the results. Thanks a bunch!

0
Posted 16 January 2016 at 01:02 in reply to #572739 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Raing of Gore? I know it doesn't work with all the cards in the deck but it does work with the card you want the deck built around. Also, the deck seems a bit slow as the only removal in the deck is Plowshares which activated before you get tainted remedy your opponent will gain the life from the creature making it hard to kill them.

0
Posted 12 January 2016 at 15:46 as a comment on Tainted Love

Permalink

I guess so.

0
Posted 11 January 2016 at 01:11 in reply to #571733 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

In my store, most people don't play cards like that so Void Winnower does the trick. Also, The another ten(maybe 12) mana Eldrazi is coming out from Oath of the Gatewatch which really make it so that you wouldn't have to care about cards like that and even if the card doesn't work like how I want it then I could still go back to standard permanent/enchanment/artifact removal.

0
Posted 11 January 2016 at 01:10 in reply to #572022 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Oh that's great. Thanks for answering, and sorry if you had to buy some Ulamogs as I like Breakers instead. I should probably make it more clear that Breaker > Ulamog (at least in this deck, a $.20 card is better than a $20.00 card.)

0
Posted 10 January 2016 at 15:54 in reply to #572022 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Then my purpose still holds as the card is known to be really strong.

0
Posted 10 January 2016 at 15:50 in reply to #571733 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

I think we as people will always miss the most obvious stuff but get the most complicated in return. Funny how that works. By the way one Loaming Shaman should be fine.

0
Posted 10 January 2016 at 15:49 in reply to #572225 on Spell Lock

Permalink

Dang this deck is so much better. Heck, it's what I've been looking for. Also, may I suggest that you might want to try a second Loaming Shaman and some Noxious Revivals/Reclaims. Once again, you made a really good version of the deck. Thanks!

0
Posted 10 January 2016 at 02:19 as a comment on Spell Lock

Permalink

I wouldn't really care as I find a good deal of fun by proving people that cards/decks they consider bad aren't so bad. People already know hat Jace is beyond amazing so I wouldn't really like a Jace.

0
Posted 09 January 2016 at 23:34 in reply to #571733 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Thanks for telling me Knivez. That's going to make my competitive life so much easier.

1
Posted 09 January 2016 at 23:32 in reply to #571966 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

283hygogg sorry to bother again but you still haven't answered my questions and for you Knivez, can you tell me what RNG stands for and if you changed anything to get better hands? Thanks to the both of you!

0
Posted 09 January 2016 at 06:19 in reply to #571966 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

I actually tried desolation twin. The card can work in the deck but you get most of it's value only after hard casting it and due to Dwadly Wanderings, I rather have a big creature that swipes the board in one-shot rather than two ten tens in which won't have anything that allows you to gain life back. Thanks for mentioning Sidisi by the way I never thought about the card so I guess I could try her. Also, the thing is with green, is that you can play green but you will most likely also need reclaim, because of this, I decided that there would be three variations of the deck that I would test: Green Black, Blue Black, and a whole bunch of different Sultai variants. Thanks you two!

1
Posted 09 January 2016 at 06:17 in reply to #572152 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Oh I see, I suppose I was a little confused. Well I got my point across (I think). Thanks for understanding!

1
Posted 08 January 2016 at 15:12 in reply to #570464 on Grandeur Palace Lock

Permalink

Now that I think of it, the two games I lost when testing were also Jeskai Black, but then again I did win one game against that deck. I think the deck's Mantis Rider and Crackling Doom Make the deck slow enough so that there burn spells matter. I wonder if there is any good sideboard against Jeskai Black. Let me know if you find anything. Also, thanks for testing I really owe you one. By the way, can you tell me if your girlfriend is new or an experienced Magic: The Gathering player and who has more experience with the game, you or her. Hope you both have a great relationship!

0
Posted 08 January 2016 at 01:43 in reply to #572022 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

Wow. Wasn't expecting you to see my side. Thanks.

0
Posted 08 January 2016 at 01:32 in reply to #571745 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

I know what your saying. Also, just give me time and I will make the deck better than ever. Finally, the deck is a two card combo(just Oriss with Abolisher).

0
Posted 08 January 2016 at 01:30 in reply to #570464 on Grandeur Palace Lock

Permalink

By the way, in real life, are one of your names Keaton (not sure if I spelled that right).

0
Posted 07 January 2016 at 03:42 in reply to #571733 on Budget Standard Turn 5 Kozilek

Permalink

101-120 of 190 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Last