Rip the crypt

by WhiteAndBlueTheyKillYou on 23 February 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Instants (1)



Enchantments (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

" There were nauseous musical instruments, stringed, brass, and wood-wind, on which St John and I sometimes produced dissonances of exquisite morbidity and cacodaemoniacal ghastliness; whilst in a multitude of inlaid ebony cabinets reposed the most incredible and unimaginable variety of tomb-loot ever assembled by human madness and perversity. "
- H.P. Lovecraft, "The Hound"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXpnI52cLEc
Yes, I am a supernatural fan, but I use this because I couldn't find the version Ralph Stanley did that I'm looking for.


After a brief discussion with Sure about his PAL(Poxtraction Aggro/Lock) I realized it's been quite a while since I've touched on my design for Iso-Seek based Poxtraction, and thus I simply had to get to work :)

Front page for "Iso-Pox", woohoo!

Deck Tags

  • Control
  • Legacy
  • Iso-Pox
  • Poxtraction

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

17
Likes

This deck has been viewed 23,300 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1302730

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Rip the crypt

Razormane and Pharaoh are interesting additions, but I find myself liking this thing. It's such an odd hybrid though...Poxtraction and Iso-Seek are usually seen as entirely different approaches, yet you blend them together.

http://www.myfacewhen.com/7/

I must study this...

1
Posted 23 February 2012 at 08:26

Permalink

If you think Razormane with the Pharaoh is a weird change, you should look at what I just did to the sideboard :P
I honestly never saw any reason why a Pox shell and Iso-Seek couldn't coexist as a deck, it's just another manner of locking your opponent out of a game. It might not be as fluid as a normal Iso-Seek design, but it is shockingly powerful I must admit.

Also, why did I never run Winter Orb before?! With a playset of Wasteland and Rishadan Port it's silly how well it works

0
Posted 23 February 2012 at 08:34

Permalink

Winter Orb with Rishadan is just so mean, but I love it =P

I don't think it was that they couldn't coexist, but that the two dominant designs never really intermingled...that is until recently (ish). PAL is quickly growing as the stronger of the two, albeit with one HELL of a learning curve (some might call it a learning "right angle" =P) and PAL uses a slight hint of Iso-Seek.

The recent advances have started to really show that blurring the lines between the two is a very welcome idea...so I'm serious when I say I'm going to study your "Iso-Pox"

P.S.; I'm copyrighting that shit.

0
Posted 23 February 2012 at 09:10

Permalink

I suggest to study it you make it, much like I say about anything else. It was originally a bit of a joking experiment, but now... This deck is one of my favourites, and this new list is simply BRUTAL.
The mingling between a Pox list and an Iso-Seek list is really natural if you just look at it like it is, you have to be perfectly confident in your ability to play both styles, and sometimes you'll be doing it at the same time.

I'm flattered by the fact that you want to study this man, you're kind of the king of Extraction.

And what do you intend to copyright? PAL?

0
Posted 23 February 2012 at 16:19

Permalink

The phrase Iso-Pox. It seems like the perfect name to describe what is being done =]

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 01:24

Permalink

Hmmm, but do I get to use it for free since I'm the one who did the deck? :P

1
Posted 24 February 2012 at 01:25

Permalink

<_<

I suppose so haha. I think the one thing that keeps making me scratch my head is that this has the Iso-Seek in it, and it has Pox in it, but it doesn't carry the threat of a Bitter Ordeal...Maybe that's what I can't wrap my head around. A big Pox --> Ordeal has a finality to it, hell, Pox itself can carry a finality with it by itself! I feel like this design has to be very careful when and what it "poxes"...and make sure it's pulled out all it needs to...because without the Ordeal half, you're putting forth a new risk for a new reward.

At the same time, I'm unsure if Ordeal really fits in this, and if it does, where? This looks like it might turn into one of those building nightmares like I had when developing PAL...Where you spend months figuring out how to compact a "70 card deck" into the size of 60 cards =/

One last thing, I think this could use a Tabernacle or two. Mayhaps replace a Rishadan and/or Wasteland?

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 01:45

Permalink

That's one of the best things about "Iso-Pox"* to me! It doesn't really need the wallet/aggro crushing beauty that is the Tabernacle, bit could use it yeah, but I'd probably actually drop the Pharaoh for it if I did. It's not enough use for me to justify it in this deck though, I have access to cheaper tech that does the job just as well in the frame.

I don't play Bitter Ordeal because it occupies such a dangerous slot on the mana curve, sure it can make somebody scoop if you bomb them, but it's just not worth clustering on three in my opinion. Bombing somebody requires an INSANE amount of mana, or shifting more to something like your suspend setup, and I just don't think it's worth it when I don't have as much as an aggro window as PAL. I open myself up to less second guessing when I pox with this design because I don't play Bitter Ordeal as well, and that makes the learning curve significantly gentler than PAL for a kicker.

And this deck is less of a building nightmare than you'd think, unless you try and splice it with a more aggro design such as your PAL. More or less you just have to think of this more as a Pox deck than Extraction, which sounds a bit backwards looking at the list sometimes, but when you get into it this deck really is a Suicide Lockout.

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 02:18

Permalink

http://www.myfacewhen.com/i/472.gif

That makes....a lot of sense.

1
Posted 24 February 2012 at 03:49

Permalink

All the joys of the Bert face. And yeah, it makes a lot of sense when you think about, but it does require a bit of the ol'
http://www.myfacewhen.com/257/

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 03:58

Permalink

If I ever develop my own Iso-Pox, I'm gonna call it "Working Class Hero"...Because for whatever reason, that song won't get out of my head when I look at this list =]

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 04:14

Permalink

Oh God why... I dunno why, but that song rubs me the wrong way in so many ways. Might I suggest this as an alternative?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h59mDlBSt7o

BAM

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 04:21

Permalink

Really? I'm downright surprised you don't like it...To each his own I s'pose =/

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 04:43

Permalink

I'm a fan of the Beatles, but when it's just one of them not so much a fan. Nowhere Man and Think For Yourself off of Rubber Soul are my favourites.
I'm more of a Monkees person, or stuff like Cream.

Some stuff I've recently gotten more into is hardstyle, they don't lie when they tell you that you can do ANYTHING to it. I recommend if nothing else you check out this song, it's kind of more darkstyle, but I likey the macabre feel to some portions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcAl8AlX6DU

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 04:52

Permalink

I love the Beatles, but I hear what you're sayin too. I think I just love the message of the song. Mostly I'm a huge fan of Floyd, the Stones, Clearwater Revival, and the like. But I like just about everything to be honest...and sometimes you just need to blow the walls off with some freakin' thrash =P

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 05:19

Permalink

I've never been able to take Clearwater seriously, it's a San Francisco group singing about the south... I never got that. I like me some swamp though, Tinny McClain is amazing, Stones cover of You'll Lose A Good Thing, ect.
I'm more about some of the harder stuff in the late sixties to early seventies to tell the truth, UFO, Scorpions(yes, I love the Schenker family), Sabbath, ect. Blue Cheer, B.B. King, and Robert Fripp all get VERY high marks in my book as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95VoQ6639pI Gypsy Ball from OutsideInside is one of the defining tracks for early heavy rock/proto-metal in I'd say.

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 05:43

Permalink

Yup, basically anything late 60's early 70's is the crap I listen to almost 24/7. One of my professors (a dude who looked like the 4th member of ZZ Top) said it perfectly, "The worst of times brought on the best of music."

I'm more of a Muddy Waters or Howlin Wolf kind of guy vs. B.B. King...Though you can't go wrong with any of those guys. And as for Clearwater being San Fran boys talking about the south...I don't get it either, but it still sounds nice. Buffalo Springfield and Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young have similar(ish) sounds to Clearwater, but I like them better overall.

But when all is said and done...Floyd is probably my favorite =]

Well damn...Now I'm going to be up until 5am listening to old songs -_-

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 06:12

Permalink

I'm all for Muddy Waters and Howlin Wolf, but the three guys who inspired me to play guitar: B.B. King, Jimi Hendrix, and Eric Clapton. I literally can not bring my self to knock them, I am addicted to the tone those three rocked.
Give me anything swampy, or even remotely Delta Bluesy, and I'm gone for like a day on a hunt through the internet for my collection.

By Floyd I have to ask: Pink, Eddie, or Council? Those are the top three musical Floyds I can think of.

I'm watching Supernatural, and hitting up Blue Oyster Cult, Iron Butterfly, Stones, and Billy Idol. I'm so glad I'm out of school till Monday
http://www.myfacewhen.com/9/

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 06:35

Permalink

Pink Floyd. And yeah I'd have to agree those are three of, if not the three best guitarists. Period. =]

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 06:37

Permalink

I'm not a big Floyd guy, maybe some of what Syd wrote, instead of what was written about him*cough*comfortably numb*cough*.

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 06:44

Permalink

Syd is the best, but I love all their stuff =]

Also, long post chain is loooooooooooong =P

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 19:59

Permalink

It's like it is with the Smiths for me, I like what they did for music, but I don't like but a select few tracks. Floyd influenced a lot of my favourite bands, the Smiths influenced Blur.
More of a King Crimson person than Floyd

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 20:36

Permalink

Also yes, long post chain is long

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 20:38

Permalink

Alright...So I finally got around to listening to that song you put in the deck description...Now I know what my deck will be called. Not Working class Hero...but "Oh Death"

http://www.myfacewhen.com/176/

1
Posted 24 February 2012 at 20:55

Permalink

Yeah, it's an oooold Appalachian Dirge, that version is the best one I can find other than Ralph Stanley, but the one I wanted by him was nowhere to be found. :/

Oh Death is a fitting name for any and all Poxtraction decks I think, I fully support it, and fully support the use of all that is man.

1
Posted 24 February 2012 at 21:30

Permalink

I found a number of videos with Ralph Stanley doing his version, or is there a specific version of his that's different from the rest?

Oh, and I finished my take on Iso-Pox =]

1
Posted 01 March 2012 at 04:55

Permalink

Didn't catch this earlier, to much going on here @_@ But yeah, there's a specific Ralph Stanley version I wanted, and I want to say it was a live version in GA, but I dunno anymore...

0
Posted 03 March 2012 at 07:22

Permalink

Great deck, White and Blue. I've tried to avoid playing against Iso-Seek and Poxtraction because of how infuriating they are to play against. I would hate to play against this deck. You've managed to make a non-kitschy version of a Iso-Pox mashup.
Nice choice with the Masticore and the Pharaoh. Do you plan to hardcast Masticore?
Watch out with the "Iso-Pox" name. There might be dimwits out there that would try to say either that Pox costs 3 mana or Smallpox is a sorcery, each being ineligible for Isochron. If there are any noobs in your playgroup, you might end up with a bruise on your forehead from the facepalming. :)

2
Posted 24 February 2012 at 03:40

Permalink

Thanks for the compliments theweust! Especially the bit about being nob-kitschy, I agree that it's hard to find a version that is fully functional. Still not sure mine is fulled fleshed though.

I have in fact hardcast the Masticore believe it or not, between Lake of the Dead and Mox Diamond I have had games where I have more mana than I know what to do with.

Oh dear God I'd love to be able to imprint one of the poxes on a Scepter, that'd be insanely brutal! I'm expecting my group just to call it Poxtraction, so far they haven't had much experience with the different versions of it, just mine.
They have had moments where I have had the level of facepalm you're talking about though, but usually for nothing magic related.

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 03:52

Permalink

Masticore is fantastic once you get it out. It's loosely like a free Bolt every turn, and in your deck, it can enable things instead of giving you card disadvantage. And it's a 5 mana 5/5 with first strike.
Talking about not having card disadvantage, Raven's Crime is a fun choice. Is that related to what you just said about having too much land?
Talking about Raven's Crime, do you play modern? Because Raven's Crime is a great choice in a modern Loam deck. I love that deck...

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 04:14

Permalink

Yup, I kept eyeballing a few cards for a reusable bolt, and another set for discard outlets, so masticore was the optimal choice :D

Raven's Crime is something brought over from my old Crucible Pox list, the high land count just kind of happens naturally in these designs though.

And I don't really play Modern after all the bans, I was the guy who played Punishing Zoo. GSZ, Knight of the Reliquary, card quality, ect. I did a lot of experimenting and it and SlaverPost had been my favourite decks in the format.
I can see Raven's Crime being powerful in Loam, it's a powerful move in Legacy, so I'm pretty positive it should be all that and a bag of chips in Modern.

0
Posted 24 February 2012 at 04:31

Permalink

Looks brutal, but what do you usually use Entomb for, the Pharaoh? A Wasteland, so you can play it from the yard with Crucible? Bloodghast maybe? I'm guessing the Pharaoh, but I'm in unfamiliar territory here, I've never played a deck like this. Either way great work.

Check out my B/W if you get the chance: Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=301393

0
Posted 25 February 2012 at 03:36

Permalink

Yeah I usually go for one of my creatures, or sometimes land, or an artifact.
Thanks for the compliment, and I'll check out your deck in a bit!

0
Posted 25 February 2012 at 04:11

Permalink

Mmkay, Pharaoh turned out to be more useful than the Masticore, but not useful enough to warrant using them. Well, advancing the extraction front now.

0
Posted 26 February 2012 at 16:50

Permalink

Could someone please look at my naya deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=299765
thanks!

0
Posted 26 February 2012 at 19:18

Permalink

nice very nice what prevoked you to try this?

0
Posted 27 February 2012 at 15:52

Permalink

Sure brought up he wasn't satisfied with his PAL deck, which is another form Extraction(albeit played entirely differently), and I realized I haven't worked on this in a long while.
Thanks for the compliment, this deck was a lot of fun to build, and is my current project for now.

0
Posted 27 February 2012 at 16:41

Permalink

hey all this is a pretty cool deck, im building zombies currently, maybe ill build a spirit deck in the future. can anyone do me a favor and check out my newly finished vampires? id greatly appreciate the criticism thanx!

0
Posted 01 March 2012 at 10:17

Permalink

Commented :D

0
Posted 01 March 2012 at 23:35

Permalink

honestly ive tried making pox style vintage n legacy decks, just way too technical for me, and i thaught that i was a pretty skilled, its also really hard to pilot, and because of that i take my hat off to you and sure and your merry gang of super magic mutants

though i do have something ridiculous and over the top that you may make you smile
i mean who dosnt like ridiculous and over the top?

turn 4 i have in play: Emrakul + Ulamog + Progenitus
and its quite consistant

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=304216

0
Posted 03 March 2012 at 00:22

Permalink

Pox is really more of a strain on design than play nowadays, when Crucible Pox was the shit it was all about learning your deck inside and out to learn when to do what. Something that kind of stuck with me here in Iso-Pox :D
I guess I can play this because I designed it from the ground up, I wanna say the original version was a year ago, so I've had lots of time to learn what I can do with it. I found your comment to be incredibly flattering nonetheless.

I will DEFINITELY be checking your deck out, but right now I'm trying to setup a game with one of my friends(Blacklight Retribution)

0
Posted 03 March 2012 at 07:43

Permalink

Aghhh, this deck is jacking my B/P up just looking at it. I'm not an aggressive person but I think I'd be moved to physical violence if I had to play against it. Well Done!

0
Posted 15 March 2012 at 15:13

Permalink