First burn Deck

by Youngdrew on 26 May 2007

Main Deck (56 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

This is my first burn deck that I have ever created. Let me know how bad it is or if it\'s any good. Criticism is appreciated.

Also, I know that I lack multiples (as do all of my decks, ha.) I do know that that is bad, too. :]

*Cards that mtgvault.com did not have in their database:

Fatal Attraction. Scorching Spear. (two)Mon\'s Goblin Raiders.

Deck Tags

  • Burn

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,426 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000480

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for First burn Deck

if you know it is bad then dont do it!!!!! god, do us all a favor and lie to us!!!! tell me you have 4 ball lightning or whatever just dont post a deck that you know should be better

0
Posted 28 May 2007 at 01:44

Permalink

iseektruth89, shut the fuck up, people post decks to get help on them. Not to have jackasses like you make fun of them, on top of that Ball Lightining doesn't go in a burn deck, it goes in a fast aggro deck, so shut up until you can be more considerate.

0
Posted 28 May 2007 at 02:02

Permalink

I hate to bring this up but in early magic days Ball Lightnings DID go in burn decks. Other then that if you can't leave constructive criticism then that must speak volumes for your less than capable playing skills. Trash talk somewhere else.

0
Posted 28 May 2007 at 02:34

Permalink

Now some suggestions. Pick one route or another either go all burn spells or more creatures and less burn. In a burn deck you hardly see any creatures unless an effect puts them into play like empty the warrens or Firecat blitz. Also you need to think about synergistic spells. What I mean by this is spells that play better with each other. For instance why use lava axe when you can use lightning axe discard fiery temper to it and get 7 damage for 2 mana. See what I mean.

0
Posted 28 May 2007 at 02:38

Permalink

Well Lava Axe is a 5 to the face while Lightning Axe is 5 to a creature. This is a Burn to the Face deck, so the Lava axe will win over the Lightning Axe.

And why not put up a sub-par deck I can own? I'd prefer to put a deck up I have all the cards for than make a deck only Bill Gates could afford and hear comments on how awesome it is.

0
Posted 28 May 2007 at 04:58

Permalink

I appreciate the suggestions and criticism. I do understand what you're saying, Skywarp, but I just don't have the cards. I'll work it out and I do plan on doing more of a spell-based burn deck than a creature-based burn deck. I'll probably drop the Trained Orgg and the two Craven Giants.

0
Posted 28 May 2007 at 05:50

Permalink