The Oncoming Storm

by calmingRespirator on 12 December 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Tags

  • Storm
  • Izzet
  • R/U
  • Modern

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 977 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

080364

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for The Oncoming Storm

looks pretty legit. maybe replace shock with needle drop?

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 04:36

Permalink

Good idea, that looks a lot better.

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 04:58

Permalink

Also there is really only room for one of these two but a alternate option to pyromancers swath is pyromancers ascension. Well actually you could run 2 of each . . . but that would just make the deck lose focus. Still its an alternate option to consider

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 05:32

Permalink

Yeah I think pyromancers ascension is actually better, it has much less of a downside, thanks for the suggestion

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 05:53

Permalink

in that case replace burning tree emissary with a cantrip or zero drop. First thing that comes to mind is gutshot.

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 05:58

Permalink

While the point of burning tree emissary was mostly to try and increase storm count rather quickly since is pays for itself, but you're right, gut shot would probably be better if I'm going for a sort of extremely fast kill deck

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 06:12

Permalink

Also because pyromancers only likes instants and sorceries, and creatures dont help it.

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 06:18

Permalink

Really cool deck, I am curious if you are quickly topdecking such that you aren't having to discard b\c of pyromancer's swath? That would be only small concern about this deck, otherwise spot on!

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 05:14

Permalink

The original point of pyromancer's swath was to try and kill them in one turn, but I actually think that what d3Necromaster suggested is probably better, since pyromancer ascension doesn't have as much of a downside.

0
Posted 12 December 2013 at 05:57

Permalink