Yes, Sir, Sergeant Paradox!

by jackfrost2324 on 04 December 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Enchantments (4)


Land (24)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Yeah, its been used a lot, but I'm building this deck around Mirror-Sigil Sergeant + Paradox Haze. First get your walls out, and then sit back, bounce creatures, counter spells, and prevent damage until you get your Hazes and Sergeants out. Also has the option of casting Eternal Dominion, which makes a deadly combo with Paradox Haze. Any constructive comments appreciated. Thanks! =)

Deck Tags

  • Casual

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,382 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1632000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Yes, Sir, Sergeant Paradox!

I'm maybe thinking of taking out Wall of Hope and putting i Wall of Frost.

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 18:41

Permalink

Chronozoa: it is like a slower version of mirror-sigil sergeant and good for blocking with since it has flying.

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 19:03

Permalink

keep wall of hope, u need turn 3 to play a counterspell or the like to keep the opponent at bay long enough to pull off the combo for the win. wall of hope can buy u at least 3 turns of safety due to life gain and early blocking. trust me, the first turn wall of hope is an excellent play. the control elements u have picked seem strange to me. there r better versions of everything that u have selected. what format r u going for here

0
Posted 05 December 2009 at 01:37

Permalink

this is a strictly casual deck. no fancy shmancy tournament stuff here.

0
Posted 08 December 2009 at 20:26

Permalink