Take It Like Hard Cock

by nukifyed on 05 November 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

For the record, the name is just to grab some attention.

This is my attempt at an artifact deck. Now Im sure there are a million ways to go about such a deck, so I really want comments on how I could improve.

Win Conditions:
-Lodestone Myr + Tap Everything
-Master of Etherium + All 0 Drops + Everything else around.
-Darksteel Forge + Plantinum Angel
-Cranial Plating + Anything

Id like to keep Forge and Platinum Angel to 1 each -- as this isn't their deck. They just compliment it in the late game.

Deck Tags

  • Other...

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

11
Likes

This deck has been viewed 11,144 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

24000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Take It Like Hard Cock

this deck sucks dick

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 12:35

Permalink

If I was to trust anyone's opinion on dick, it would certainly be yours.

4
Posted 05 November 2009 at 13:16

Permalink

alex certainly hasn;t proven himself to be a great deck builder in my eyes... He's probably one of those people with 8 accounts that -1 votes all the top rated decks because of his bitterness that his aren;t good enough to make it there.

All I could recommend is Mishra. Mishra, Mishra and more Mishra. And then some Mishra.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 13:33

Permalink

My search for Mishra turned up 8 results, 2 of which are probably what you were talking about.

Were you talking about Mishra, Artificer Prodigy? Or Mishra Worshop (which I will never get to own lol)

And in Alex's defense, puberty is a bitch.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 13:39

Permalink

By the way... Mishras only like 35 cents. Thats a nice addition.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 13:46

Permalink

barbarian is an idiot my comment was a response on the name of this deck cause
one
don't give such stupid names to your decks
and two

the deck is in fact bad

and i am a good deckbuilder i can ensure you i only have 1 account
and i would pound barbarian into the ground in a second i dareto say

this site is bad why? cause people allways downrate th ebest decks here as to see with the vampire decks
and the bad fucky decks are allways overrated
learn to play magic

not to you nuki but for barbarian

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 14:01

Permalink

little late to say this.. but.. grow up. its a game. treat it like one.

0
Posted 21 October 2011 at 15:55

Permalink

Could you please enlighten us as to why the deck is bad? Etherium could come into play under multiple opening hands as a 10/10 on turn 3. Lodestone even bigger on turn 4. Hell, although unlikely... Platinum Angel could come out on turn 3.

Im not saying this is the end all deck, as I find many of my/playgroups decks are better... but its worth the 20 bucks just to see the look on a friends face as you play 5-7 cards on turn 1.

Furthermore, the deck name was far more hilarious before you killed my buzz lmao

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 14:15

Permalink

i think this is a good start to a deck. I would have recommended mishra's workshop but that would be out the question since you are trying to actually build it and you already said you didn't want to pay for it (i wouldn't either). maybe priviledged position because that comboed with platinum angel and darksteel forge almost garuantees a win. But then again, that would be impractical because of the number of those cards you have in the deck. Maybe fabricate would be good for this deck. That way you can get the stuff you need faster. Also i think its wonderful how everyone is bashing eachother on this site. Nice to see. After all, thats what this site is for- ridiculing people. : P yeah...that should stop. +1 on this deck by the way.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 14:15

Permalink

Yeah no idea where all the hostility is coming from. Thanks for commenting Hippo. You always have something constructive to say.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 14:21

Permalink

No problem man. anytime : )

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 14:26

Permalink

i agree the name is misplaced don't give such stupid names not even to attract attention

and i think too the deck is bad for multiple reasons

the myrs aren't needed since you play a lot of 0 costs

and i just think master of etherium is too vulnerable it's not a good wincon cause any card could sweep it from the board

if it's just a fun deck you could maybe add whispersilk or something that gives shroud?
and if it's tourney
deffinitely play ravager

ciao

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 15:06

Permalink

o yes i mean the reason why i think it isn't that good is too because your creatre choice isn't that great and certainely not against new aggro
even if it's not for tournament

i would recommend some bigger creatures arcbound maybe?

and certainly remove the myrs.
there are soooo many choices for artifact decks you just have to find your way

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 15:08

Permalink

I still dont understand how this wouldnt work in a causal setting Alex lol. Turn 4, you should have either Etherium or Lodestone out, at 10/10 or larger... worst case. Not to mention a Cranial would double that power. So bigger creatures is kinda a retarded statment.

Myrs are there for a reason, as I dont wish to add regular lands... and need the correct colors to play Etherium and Ethersworn.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 16:00

Permalink

I like this deck. +1 for sure. I'm a fan of artifacts especially after the Shards Block booming.

Now as for Aethercraft, Alex... Please before you rush to tear down someone's deck SOLELY because you just simply don't understand it, remove yourself from the page before you embarrass yourself. All your comments have proven thus far is that neither of you two know what an Artifact Deck truly is, and how powerful it can be to have everything in the deck be an artifact. Why do you think they came out with Artifact Lands and Affinity for Artifacts in the first place!? Maybe to play Darksteel Colossus for free? Or to allow for a retarded big Etherium? Or perhaps it's just to confuse poor souls who can't wrap their heads around basic MTG concepts.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 16:58

Permalink

I was referring to Mishra, Artificer Prodigy. I personally believe he belongs in every artifact deck ever. This is a baller deck. Most artifact decks are. Alex just doesn't understand that casual play exsists.

Speaking of Alex, I love how he said he could pound me into the dirt. If he's talking about Magic, I'd love to see him try because I couldn't give two fucks less. If he's talking about real life, I'd like to see him try. If he's talking about a battle of wits, I already won. It's called PUNCTUATION. The world will take you much more seriously when you can form and convey a thought coherently.

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 20:54

Permalink

Ever notice how similar Aethercraft's and thealextheory's posts look?

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 21:03

Permalink

Just finished a play test on that insect deck. I had a 120/120 turn 9. If there would have been a 10th turn, he would have been around 400/400

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 21:53

Permalink

well ok but it doesn't matter to have that big creatures nowadays creatures must have bigger influence on the gameplay
that's why i don't like the concept neither
but if you think magic is about getting 400/400 monsters all the time it's your choice

and thealextheory was an account of 4 people i used to be the owner at the start, but since some of the co-owners were actually posting rude comments and i got downrated alot cause of that
i made my own account
that's the reason too i have some of the same decks.

and if you are going to search problems with me just cause you think I posted those rude comments well do it
it's your problem not mine

i'm just here to comment your deck and tell you my opinion and my opinion is
that your deck just needs some more play value
i am a tournament player not a flavor player that wants to make 400/400 creatures because they are really impressive
i like to play with tactics

now bye and don't start to argue with me about the 'thealextheory' fact i changed the password and the ones who were rude won't come on anymore so

have fun making edcks and stop complaining about rude comments cause internet has allways been 'terrorised'
by rude and stupid people.

also my posts probably look quite the same cause i'm from belgium
and sven is too

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 06:11

Permalink

Ah. Then I retract all of my previous statements referring to grammar and sentence structure. My bad. I also play with tactics. I just think it's fun to see how crazy you can get.

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 06:42

Permalink

I like apples.

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 08:39

Permalink

Sorry we just dominated this comment board...

Apples are sweet.

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 14:11

Permalink

Apples are indeed sweet. I ordered a Misrha today.

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 21:07

Permalink

Springleaf Drum is weak in my opinion, how about some Black Lotus? Much better. ;D

0
Posted 08 November 2009 at 08:15

Permalink

had to say it, im sure everyone would love a black lotus... if it didnt cost u anywhere from 1 to 100 grand lmao.

nukifyed: the deck seems like alot of fun to play, Mishra will be a great add i have a friend who uses that card and its rather annoying >.> there is one more card that if u can make the room for can make this deck a million times more fun for u and a pain for ur opp. Storage Matrix! its just an amazing card for an all arti deck. good luck, and feel free to comment on any of mine.

0
Posted 18 October 2011 at 16:41

Permalink

i really like this deck, because i love artifacts and that every card in this deck has great synergy with every card.

i also would like to suggest, if you could make room for the Empire cards from M12 as an added wincon but if that would be a pain its ok, would just like to know if it would work :)

0
Posted 18 October 2011 at 17:37

Permalink

Iike the deck. always loved artifacts. This type of deck, especially, has 1000 ways it can be run. Your deck is great for not only starting fast but i also like the platinum angel combo for that "Once in a blue moon" situation where the game is a long skirmish and you need a final win condition.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=240639

I just posted my version of an artifact decks on if you wanna check it out. Proves a point; a lot of the same cards, but a very different win condition :)

0
Posted 18 October 2011 at 18:00

Permalink

well, cause you already have all the artifact lands incorporated, why not add tezzeret the seeker and tezzeret agent of bolas?

0
Posted 18 October 2011 at 21:18

Permalink

Keep in mind this deck doesn't look like it's been updated since it was made two years ago.

0
Posted 18 October 2011 at 21:29

Permalink

true true...

0
Posted 21 October 2011 at 01:45

Permalink

man im sorry to see you got allot of flacking comments
though screw them
im glad you like magic
and darksteel forge + neveryaals disk = WIN

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 06:14

Permalink