Dragon's Maze Bant?

by Some_Soggy_Tacos on 24 April 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (3 cards)

Creatures (3)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A play around a lot of new Dragon's Maze popular cards. Cackling Counterpart and growing ranks are for a populate Voice of Resurgence win condition. This is just a basic idea, so tell me what you think and how to make it better please!

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,517 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

25230030

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Dragon's Maze Bant?

Looks pretty solid. Only critique I have is that council of the absolute seems like more of a sideboard card, and uncovered clues seems kinda unplayable. I'd drop the clues and slide over the council to throw in progenitor mimic, thragtusk, master biomancer, or any combination thereof. Progenitor tokens can be populated, and getting two thragtusks every turn seems sick, especially when they're 7/5. Not to mention the synergy with resurgence tokens, producing lots of creatures is ideal. I'd also consider dropping a few azorious charms, a more creatures will be ideal here. I hope this helped. :)

1
Posted 24 April 2013 at 01:32

Permalink

Thanks, but one question, why is Uncovered clues unplayable? it seems like with the amount of instants and sorceries in the deck it would be perfectly valid. (I totally agreed with everything else you said. thanks for responding!)

0
Posted 24 April 2013 at 05:19

Permalink

Well there are enough instants and sorceries for it to work, but lets compare it to divination. For the same cost, you can just draw two cards. No risk, no drawbacks, no catch. Clues does give you a larger window, but there's always that chance that you'll get no cards and send good stuff to the bottom. Plus, this build doesnt entirely rely on creatures, but it still needs them to function properly. In cases after board wipes when you need creatures more than anything, it can be a dead draw. Since its at sorcery speed anyway, you'd be better off running augur of bolas - at very least hes a solid blocker. If you want to invest an extra $15, jace architect of thought would be an even better option just for his -2. The versatility of selection is much more beneficial. The list looks great, btw, seems really fun to play. :)

1
Posted 24 April 2013 at 05:34

Permalink