Angelic Army

by Spiritsoldier on 16 January 2015

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (26 cards)

Sorceries (2)


Instants (2)


Enchantments (4)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Revolves around using angel tokens and gaining life.

Updated: 1/20/2015

How to Play

Use walls, awe strike, and sun's bounty to activate angelic accord. Enchantments to help activate sigil of the empty throne. Luminarch ascension, throw out asap, and use druids deliverance, rootborne defenses, or awe strike again to prevent damage. Luminous wake can be used to enchant wall, or an angel token, and also counts towards sigil of the empty thrown.

Later in game, attach moonsilver spear to an angel and keep attacking. Also use parallel lives anytime during play to double token production.

Deck Tags

  • Token
  • Angel
  • Populate
  • G/W

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 926 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

360006

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Angelic Army

I like the idea, but the ENTIRE deck is based off of having Angelic Accord out on the field, and that's what I'm not such a fan of. All of your populate effects are useless without it, and will just end up being dead weight in your hand. If Angelic Accord is near the bottom of the deck, that's an almost guaranteed loss for you. I'd put some other token producers in there to keep the deck to make it work better. Luminarch ascension, moonsliver spear, and maybe sigil of the empty throne since you have 10 other enchantments already.

0
Posted 16 January 2015 at 22:40

Permalink

You have a good point. I will revise this deck for other token producers and make it public again once I finish. Thank you for your suggestion!

0
Posted 17 January 2015 at 00:08

Permalink

No problem, looking forward to seeing the revised version.

0
Posted 17 January 2015 at 00:12

Permalink