General 4/4s

by TheGreatGodLoki on 24 September 2021

Command Zone (1 card)

Creatures (1)

Main Deck (99 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

4
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,882 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

6700580

Deck Format


Commander

NOTE: Set by owner when deck was made.

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for General 4/4s

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 24 September 2021 at 21:40

Permalink

I'm sorry, who the fuck are you? I uploaded my edh list because I like to stay consistent among the many sites I use. My friends vary on their preferred sites so I just upload to a few.

I'm not active again because of the werewolf stuff, I just wanted to post my list.

1
Posted 25 September 2021 at 06:35

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 25 September 2021 at 14:52

Permalink

Okay so

1. I don't really care if I put descriptions in my decks or not. I just auto upload and either forget to put it to unlisted or I put it public.

2. I don't really care about doing anything you've suggested. Honestly you sound like a bit a prick. Yes I listened to you before, but you've honestly rubbed me the wrong way with this "good list" bullcrap. Go gate keeper somewhere else.

3. I'm not here to do anything. If people want to post lists, then commenters can ask questions about them. It'll happen organically.

0
Posted 25 September 2021 at 16:26

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 25 September 2021 at 20:38

Permalink

I like it! It seems nicely focused around the commander, with only the minimum of mono-colour spells. The mana curve is pretty low and it's budget friendly! Could Ferrous be the new Feather?
As you've got a lot of instant and sorceries, have you thought about including Firesong and Sunspeaker? Could be funny with Blasphemous Act. :)
(bonus upvotes for telling Wilteddankman where to shove it)

1
Posted 26 September 2021 at 00:19

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 26 September 2021 at 02:52

Permalink

Thanks Matt! Curve is low because he wants to pump out those 4/4s and keep casting spells. I thought about Firesong, but mana wise I couldn't justify it over a cheaper card. Plus I don't run a lot of life gain to take advantage of their second ability.

It's cheap because I run only the worse RW cards.

Also when did this guy become a gatekeeper to this site?

-1
Posted 26 September 2021 at 03:16

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 26 September 2021 at 03:21

Permalink

There are no trolls. Bro people are just uploading decks so they can log their decking building ideas and share them with friends.

I think you're trying to do something that no is asking for and no one wants.

0
Posted 26 September 2021 at 15:56

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 26 September 2021 at 19:42

Permalink

Trolls =\= what you think it is. Seriously. Please show directly what you say is a troll. Spamming decks is not behavior of trolls.

-1
Posted 26 September 2021 at 23:14

Permalink

Wilteddankman
"Hibernation from 2013 to 2017, a shift to posting only EDH upon awakening" Yeah, almost as if I moved away and didn't have playgroup for a few years... Such suspicious behavior.

I post EDH because I play EDH, and I own every deck I've posted here. I use this site to keep track of my decks because I prefer the interface to the likes of TappedOut, etc. I'm gracious enough to make my decklists public, so that others can use them for ideas. I couldn't give a fuck about your lists.

As I've said to you before, I think these "trolls" are probably just trying to piss you off personally, probably took offence to you telling people off for not writing descriptions how you want them to. That's probably why your rep is -1000, too. I'd downvote you if I could, but I dont have enough rep.

0
Posted 27 September 2021 at 00:58

Permalink

Why don't you make a new deck and whinge in the description like usual? Maybe another shitty lantern mill modern deck?

1
Posted 27 September 2021 at 01:00

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 27 September 2021 at 14:48

Permalink

There is quality over quantity, you know? Just saying ;)

1
Posted 27 September 2021 at 15:12

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 27 September 2021 at 16:24

Permalink

Bro half your lists are just mill decks with completely random descriptions...

0
Posted 27 September 2021 at 18:00

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 27 September 2021 at 19:32

Permalink

Dude, I build physical decks. Some of my lists are old builds, so I currently have 21 EDH and 4 modern decks. Personally, I think that is quite a lot of decks to have and I've put my blood, sweat and tears (and quite a lot of money) into putting them together. As for comments, I post when I have a constructive comment or when I'm genuinely impressed by a deck - like this one. As SpliNter said, quality over quantity.

How many of those 453 decks have you actually physically built? How many have you played? I suspect you are more of a theorist than a player, and that's fine, but please stop trying to tell people how to curate their own shit. We're all different.

By the way, the reason a lot of EDH decks dont have descriptions/guides is because they don't need them. In most cases, the commander does a thing and the deck supports it in doing that thing. What more is there to say?

1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 01:22

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 28 September 2021 at 07:25

Permalink

"have a fanbase and once I won the "creativity prize" just by walking in through the doors of a tournament, which sort of was a little unfair to everyone else playing rogue brews, but I accepted the prize anyways."


Pfffff alright bro whatever you need to tell yourself to justify your jank decks you build when you fizzle out at 0-3.


I've googled you, legitimately nothing came up or on YouTube. So I doubt you are who you say you are.

-1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 13:01

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 28 September 2021 at 13:13

Permalink

Then please provide me links to all of this. Show me the creativity prize you won, show me your history of playing magic, I'd like to see it. If you have nothing to hide, and nothing to fear then by your next comment you should be able to provide them.

If you can, then I shall delete my profile from this website and never return.

-1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 18:47

Permalink

"Oh shit, here comes wilteddankman and his shitty post-it decks. He's going to lose and throw a massive autist rage fit. Let's give him this 'creativity award' so he won't sulk." Creativity prizes aren't a thing at any tournament I've ever been to.

I too, have googled him, and he's banned from the MTG Wiki, "This user has been blocked by Sneakyhomunculus on January 29, 2007 for an indefinite duration for constant trolling." Then on another name with the same IP: "This user has been blocked by Magic Mage on June 23, 2008 for an indefinite duration for creation and insertion of nonsense/gibberish into pages" Also banned from MTGSalvation for similar reasons.

Known aliases to watch out for are Flavortext, Birdmaiden, Faceless Wanderer and possibly Troll.

Basically, he's a nutjob and possible fantasist. Probably best avoided unless you like arguing with the mentally ill.

2
Posted 29 September 2021 at 02:07

Permalink

Good research! Thanks

0
Posted 29 September 2021 at 04:53

Permalink

Fucking lol.

-1
Posted 29 September 2021 at 04:57

Permalink

So, he's banned from numerous other sites for doing the same exact thing?! Hmmm...sounds very troll-like behavior.

0
Posted 29 September 2021 at 14:30

Permalink

Been awful quiet since you posted that xD

-2
Posted 29 September 2021 at 15:00

Permalink

It really has lol

0
Posted 29 September 2021 at 17:27

Permalink

Nah, he's switched to one of Loki's other decks where he thinks I won't see him. https://www.mtgvault.com/thegreatgodloki/decks/every-point-counts/

0
Posted 29 September 2021 at 18:50

Permalink

Wow, he did swtich! And he's relentless!

-1
Posted 29 September 2021 at 19:43

Permalink

I just saw that, the absolute mad lad.

-2
Posted 29 September 2021 at 19:49

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 05 February 2022 at 13:37

Permalink

i really like this list any changes id add are $ land tax, helm of the host. enlightened tutor, old school gisella and aurelia i have more suggestions if u are interested id love to help on any edh deck
https://www.mtgvault.com/vaan104/decks/edh-helper/

1
Posted 27 September 2021 at 04:46

Permalink

I thought about land tax and more protection, but he has some solid built in protection I felt he didn't need more, and for extra combat triggers I felt having 1 was more than enough since there isn't a lot of dual color ones out there.

-2
Posted 27 September 2021 at 17:59

Permalink

Land Tax is awesome in any deck that has white in, but it's a pricy boi!
I'd definitely think about Helm of the Host though, it could get pretty silly after a few turns.

0
Posted 27 September 2021 at 23:18

Permalink

Anointed Procession would also be amazing.

0
Posted 27 September 2021 at 23:22

Permalink

Ugh I know.... But like Doubling Season, Parallel Lives, and other effects it comes with a $40 tag. However I did weigh the idea of annointed, but being a mono colored spell I felt I had other dual colors to shore it up (ie none at all)

Helm is also a good card, but I felt playing on curve and bringing out dual colored cards helps make his effect seem crazier than it is.

-2
Posted 28 September 2021 at 06:05

Permalink

To be fair, playing Procession or the Helm would probably make you instant archenemy for every other player. Maybe it's better off as it is - not every deck needs to be a powerhouse and sometimes you just want to have some fun.

0
Posted 29 September 2021 at 02:13

Permalink

Have you considered Iroas, God of Victory for this list? Possibly over Tajic?

0
Posted 27 September 2021 at 19:11

Permalink

I've thought about it, price wise and combat wise I feel like Tajic is just harder to remove and I haven't really felt like I needed a lot of combat protection, however I may if I feel I need that extra protection

-1
Posted 27 September 2021 at 20:34

Permalink

Fun deck idea! Boros aggro is always a fun idea, and it is great to see Ferrous as commander!! I see you too have a running chat with wickeddarkman...join the club :)

0
Posted 27 September 2021 at 23:46

Permalink

Haha, I did like his advice at first on my modern deck but then his comment to kick us off just rubbed me the wrong way.

-2
Posted 28 September 2021 at 06:03

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 28 September 2021 at 06:40

Permalink

Bruh there's a difference between improving THE DECK and spending $30-$50 on a physical card. Get out of here with this "improving yourself" bullcrap

-2
Posted 28 September 2021 at 13:00

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 28 September 2021 at 13:15

Permalink

Wickeddarkman, it's the "You could be on my "good list""

This. This comment is what rubbed him the wrong way, and to be fair, it would rub most people the wrong way. Who are you to decide who's good and who isn't? That is some gatekeeping nonsense. Also, you can improve a deck without improving yourself and you can improve yourself without improving a deck. They are not the same thing.

And saying everyone else has joined is incorrect. I don't recall joining and that is some peer pressure bulls***.

TLDR; At least in this particular comment thread, you're being an ass. Check yourself.

-1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 13:23

Permalink

There seems to be a divide between what wickeddarkman is saying and what other believe. I've learned it's best to just let him talk about the way that he envisions things...and the rest of us can use this site as we see fit. It's like arguing with a wall.

-1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 13:23

Permalink

That is probably true Leste,

Wicked wants to be lightning rod of hate just to be justified in his crusade against trolls, when it's these self imposed rules and made up witch hunts that cause this rift with everyone.

That being said, Couch is right, they aren't the same thing. You can be a stellar deck builder and win games with shitty cards SEE BEING GOOD AT DRAFT EVENTS and you can be a shitty player that's amazing at net decking.

At this point this is a tourist spot for everyone and I think we should all end this soon.

-2
Posted 28 September 2021 at 18:51

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 28 September 2021 at 18:58

Permalink

We get that you may be famous in Denmark, and well-renowned in MTG...which is great. But just because you are an "expert" at one thing, doesn't make you an expert at everything else...and it just seems wrong to use this website as a springboard to show your "superiority" in Magic and how it is a way to improve your life. Loki and couch are right...you have made some comments that have rubbed many of us the wrong way...and that's your right to go in and slander us all for not abiding by your "rules" for this site. It's not really helping your case any by hounding the same people over and over again. So if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all, really. You can try and silence what we say to who, and how we want to use this site, but it's not going to change the minds of people who want to have fun without feeling that they have to abide by a certain set of rules. You have one view of making this site your way, and some of us are using it a different way...and that's fine. But joining everyone's conversation and commenting on everyone's decks with the same speech is not going to win you any new fans...and will probably make a lot more people think that you are the troll that you are so against.

1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 19:14

Permalink

Speak past each other? Bro we've been talking at you the entire time and you've been deflecting everything.

We ask for your evidence on trolls, you've said "And I got several usernames to show who spams decks for fun, like user flashover who spammed more than a hundred decks on friday the 13th." Was he trolling? Was he just uploading for fun? You then turned around and accused a user for randomly uploading after a while.

By your own admission YOU UPLOADED 400+ decks so how are you not a spammer/troll?

-1
Posted 28 September 2021 at 19:32

Permalink

wickeddarkman has deleted this comment.

Posted 28 September 2021 at 20:05

Permalink