There's a storm comin'

what should I replace for them

I got a crazy crazy replacement.
Tezzeret's gambit
It's blue mana can be paid by life, so it costs 3 colourless when theres no reducers in play.
If there are one of each reducers it costs 1 mana and two life.

What do you think alfred ?
Could it become a usefull drawcard in any izzet storm ?

I like that idea I can add a couple and replace the baral and the goblin electromaners

Hold that thought for a second :)
It might be that adding that card would make it more advantageous to keep 4 of each reducer.
If you cut anyways I think the best thing to cut would be one or more baral because you can have 4 of the goblins in play.

Let's get Alfred's oppinion here, he has a wast collection of storm decks and has a lot more authority on those than I have :)

ok and I wasnt going to remove all of them because they are very nice to have in the deck I was thinking about taking out 2 baral (because legend rule) and 1 electormancer that way I can run 3 bambits

I would keep 4 of the goblin, and test heavily how many baral I could remove.
I suspect that the smart thing might be to remove some of the cantrip (serum visions, opt or slight of hand) as these draws you just 1 card. Some of these would be good to prepare what you will draw with the gambit.

But gambit could potentially become a 0-cost drawcard.

The problem is that they don't draw you more cards and faithless is banned, so you can't get another good card to discard them

I suggested he added some tezzeret's gambit.
Read read.

I was explaining why there was to many and it wasn’t talked about, I did read. Think think

Sadist sadist ;)

You’re confusing not caring about causing suffering with liking causing suffering

If you do not care, then why do you tease?
I'm not confused I'm "confutze" (how does one spell that?)

Why shouldn't I?

Yes, why indeed, but that wasn't the issue.

If it costs nothing to do, I see no reason not to do it, even if there’s nothing to gain

Eating shit costs nothing. Jumping of a cliff costs nothing, but both do involve what could be seen as a price.

Costs nothing there is a reason not to eat shit and a reason not to jump off a cliff

Then eat your own words, that also costs nothing, and you would see no reason why you wouldn't do it.
Besides, if you don't do it, you can't stand by your own words.
Eat eat :)

That costs pride, you seem to be very bad at finding costs in things.

I just have a different set of values.
I value clarity, you value obscuration.
So our point of views sort of causes a clash.

Pride is yet another mental construct meant to enslave others.
By holding on to your pride, you smack me down the human ladder of morals, except I don't abide to that kind of evaluation. It's related to honor, respect, and other superiority constructs. Whichever human has the most of this is seen as "good" by others upholding the same value system.

To me, all of that is really useless, just like fashion and status.

It's a way to degrade and enslave...

Ok then, eating my words would devalue me as a source of information

Exactly, which is why I always show aggression towards you when you question my words.
I'm basically showing everyone else that I'm willing to fight for my statements. It is also a display meant to get you to back down so my words will not be doubted any further.
It's all classic status behaviour.
Most people discover the rules during childhood, while autism related children needs to be explained why humans use the entire status system or they fail to understand it.

I can basically "play the game"
But I believe it's really crippling for humanity, because just like in magic, whenever there is a winner, there has to be a loser. But it doesn't have to be that way. We could design other systems.

This system isn't designed for a winner loser design, it's just greed makes it that way.

Couldn't agree more.
It's fun how the downvote troll has chosen to continue to continue fighting in this page, where the only topic I've brought to the table is how tezzeret's gambit could become a 0-cost draw.
Have you thought about what could be cut to run it ?

There's 3 in the deck now

And less aria of flame.

Whymeh12356:
Have you tested it ?

Yes I have play tested it and for the most part it runs good. I have not really been able to play test it against real modern decks because I am on a whole different level than my play group

Alfred might be able to pinpoint some testdecks for you, then you could proxy them and play against yourself

If you have untap I could actually play against you, but for now around what power level is your playgroup?

My play group is mostly casual but I play from anywhere from jankier decks to more competive it just depends on what mood I’m in when I build the deck for example my raining lands deck I had built because I wanted a jankier wincon that could still work

Oh, yeah, that deck :)
Any success with hostility ?
Have you beaten any millers yet ?

Ya I have beaten a few millers but I was thinking about running jace or maniac to kind of lean into the mill because I run the treasure hunt with so many lands it would be fairly easy to win that way

I might swap dousing with remand, and as for testdecks so you want a similar storm or something else?