Dragon Liberty

by demonking28 on 06 April 2015

Command Zone (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added any commanders, they probably should...

Main Deck (99 cards)

Sideboard (1 card)

Creatures (1)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

this is my latest version of my EDH land destruction deck. has seen plenty of wins so far but always looking to upgrade it as i go.

comments welcomed.

http://lcp.trwv.net/lcp/jeffely/karatbars/45480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo2ultjlc8w&feature=youtu.be

Deck Tags

  • EDH
  • Numot
  • Land Destruction
  • Shenanigans

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,407 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

37260180

Deck Format


Commander

NOTE: Set by owner when deck was made.

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Dragon Liberty

Uugh, the one thing I loathe to play against: land destruction. Few things are more frustrating than watching an opponent whittle away at your deck's lifeforce. This is just devious, not to mention nasty. At least you were nice enough to use From the Ashes instead of Ruination...

Question 1: Why use the Hypersonic Dragon instead of the Leyline of Anticipation or Vedalken Orrery?

Question 2: Why not use Rite of Replication? You have a good deal of creatures that could benefit from cloning.

Question 3: With the large number of noncreature spells you play, have you considered using Monastery Mentor for pumpable tokens?

Question 4: Control is a large part of this deck. Have you seen or considered Web of Inertia? If so, why not?

Question 5: Mana Web is a fairly effective way of dealing with other control opponents, as is War's Toll (which the latter goes nicely with your Propaganda-like enchantments). Did you consider these when conceptualizing the deck?

(NOTE: none of these are meant to be derogatory in any way, just questions and statements viewing card utility in and without the deck.)

3
Posted 07 April 2015 at 02:18

Permalink

honestly the dragon is just for flavor for me. and i dont need to be a total ass XD everyone is like urself, they really dont like letting this get going. rite of replication i havent thought of and im not sure if anyone will trade me one lol. the other cards i havent even herd of or thought about ill check them out. though im not really sure what i would take out to make room for them. opinions???

http://lcp.trwv.net/lcp/jeffely/karatbars/45480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo2ultjlc8w&feature=youtu.be

1
Posted 08 April 2015 at 23:31

Permalink

And that's where it gets tough. At the least, Hypersonic Dragon would be my first one out, just so I could trade it with the Leyline. I'd choose the Leyline over the Orrery because enchantments have a better synergy in this deck, in my eyes (Primarily as more fodder for your Sphere of Safety). I'm really on the fence about Sea Gate Oracle, I feel like he could be replaced with Monastery Mentor or another enchantment, mainly Web of Inertia.
Hehehehe, I wonder if anyone would even tell you they had a Rite of Replication for trade if they knew where it was going. Maybe trade out Divination for it, if you manage to get one?

2
Posted 09 April 2015 at 01:31

Permalink

if i can ever get the leyline i might try the swap, i do enjoy the dragon it is fun and when i need a blocker it helps. i have been on the fence about the oracle myself, just havent been sure what i would drop it for. if i could find another i might toss in young pyromancer. hahahaha i highly doubt i will get one from my group. they arent that dumb any more XD. the trade for divination might be something to think bout.

1
Posted 09 April 2015 at 20:54

Permalink

-_- o land destruction such unfun things to be doing to someone....

2
Posted 29 November 2015 at 20:23

Permalink