velshtein equivolency

by dknight27 on 29 October 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Enchantments (4)


Land (20)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

this deck was requested of me by Valkan, he loves necropotence, and lets be honest, who shouldnt. it enables all kinds of fun. this deck uses it for a storm 1 hit kill. dump all but 1 life, prolly 15 or so, for 15 or so cards. then play as many 0 mana spells as possible and then tendrils of agony for the storm win. duress and pact of negation are in here to make sure tendrils goes off. the beauty of this deck is that with a 15 or so draw you are pretty sure to get what you need, so a turn 3 necropotence leads to an easy turn 4 win. ive got a few other ideas for necropotence decks. badabing

Deck Tags

  • Combo

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 950 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

003000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for velshtein equivolency

here is a good game

turn 1- land
turn 2- land
turn 3- land and necropotence
turn 4- land, pay out 19 life, draw 19 cards, play duress to make the opponent discard that counterspell, play 9 spells (0 mana) then tendrils, win

0
Posted 29 October 2010 at 23:29

Permalink

damn it dknight, i knew i was asking the right person to do my job!! thank you for your time and cant wait to see your next necro-deck. You also gave me an idea; do you think that necro could work with affinity?? i mean 0 cost artifacts and affinity cards that come for free at tons thanks to necropotence. Anyway i dont want to confuse you, im just waiting for your next necro-idea...

0
Posted 30 October 2010 at 17:18

Permalink