There's Ooze In The Kitchen!

by julian123 on 25 February 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (14 cards)


Sorceries (4)


Enchantments (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

First your opponent has to get through the discard spells, but they can only get 1-3 spells out of the way, so you'll have a few more to ruin. Then they start getting stuff. Then a couple of their things are getting past, so just destroy them! Then if you get garruk and there's nothing but land in play, just make wolves attack, then they play a creature kill it with garruk and make poison wolves! Then sacrifice them for eternal witness and scavenging ooze or something that can help then bust them! After all this you end up with one or two creatures or they do.Please comment. The reason i'm not running dark confidant or tarmogoyf is that they cost a fortune. Please tell me what to change!

Deck Tags

  • Modern
  • Kind-of control

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

11
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,470 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0038024

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for There's Ooze In The Kitchen!

I'm trying to make a modern deck to play at FNM But I have no experience in modern so I don't know what to prepare for. Please tell me what to change and if this would be modern tournament quality. I will return the favor. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 03:05

Permalink

rp24 has deleted this comment.

Posted 03 March 2014 at 19:28

Permalink

not sure if this helps, but I like predator ooze..

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 03:30

Permalink

Do you think this is a good deck in modern? Please tell me. And the only reason I would not run predator ooze is that it costs 3 of one color in a three color deck. thanks! :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:02

Permalink

slime molding is a sorcery you might get use out of late game... and yeah I think this deck could do really well

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:47

Permalink

Thanks! Are there any decks you want me to look at? I'll have to tomorrow though it's really late. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 06:12

Permalink

my zur edh. Its what I use the most and any new ideas are useful. id like to keep most changes to 3 or less mana though. heres the link: http://www.mtgvault.com/greggygreg/decks/enchantment-guru-2/

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 06:26

Permalink

I completely agree about predator ooze being added. numerous reasons make me agree. first board wipes are present as well as a good amount of larger creatures. predator ooze will serve as a blocker as well as an attacker later on. You may want to consider primeval titans as well to get lands out of your deck to thin it out as well being the big hitter. I'm not as ggood with control but i feel a few more counters and discard cards would assist a lot.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:06

Permalink

Thanks! Do you like this deck? And I think primeval titan is to mana-expensive but I'll try to work with the land to get predator ooze in, And do you think this would do well in a modern tournament? oh, and one last thing, what do you think i should take out for predator ooze? :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:10

Permalink

I'm thinking a finks and a sower. while finks is a great card it's only getting weaker after it dies and predator is the same cost and will only die to neg counters and exile. Its a much sturdier card. And while its always fun to take an opponents creature the ooze is cheaper.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:24

Permalink

Yea I think final should be replaced with predator ooze too

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:25

Permalink

I say take out spell snare for spell pierce

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:16

Permalink

Should I switch them? I mean from main deck to SB and The other way? :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:23

Permalink

Yea I think so

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:23

Permalink

Okay, I did. Please tell me if you like this deck and if it is good and If you think I should a deck called Healing Bear! :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:26

Permalink

Yea this deck seems good maybe desecration demon?

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:29

Permalink

Oh yeah! How many and what to take out. Please tell me if eternal witness is good in this deck. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:32

Permalink

I think enternal. Is not good because pretty much if you add Dd I would say yes but if you do not add dd I say no

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:41

Permalink

It is imo. Its a minor defense against mill and discard plus you get to choose what you get back.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:41

Permalink

Wait why would eternal witness be good if I add Desecration Demon? And I should Keep it in or not? And What do you think I should take out for desecration demon? :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:52

Permalink

Okay, i want one last call before I buy this tomorrow. So please tell me what you think I should take out for the demon I want this deck by friday and If I order it tomorrow I think the website I get it from can get it to me in time. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 04:58

Permalink

I have to say tye threads it has a very big limit to what you can steal off the opponents

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:00

Permalink

I say take out threads for dd

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:03

Permalink

Really, no threads? I guess I was assuming that they would play a tarmagoyf or dark confidant or kor spiritdancer or scavenging ooze or if they get a good token ( if dark depths was modern, do that and look at their face) or just an average creature but if you think I should I will take them out. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:07

Permalink

Keep threads in sideboard for goyf sorry bit tired now

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:09

Permalink

What should I take out for the threads in the Sideboard?

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:18

Permalink

If they play goyf while you have predator ooze you have no worry then if it hits the grave get rid of it with scavenging ooze. while goyf us a great card its honestly easily dealt with. and there's really not going to be a token worth stealing. marit lage and the token from voice of resurgence are imo the only ones worth stealing and marit isn't viable in modern

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:18

Permalink

So No Threads at all? I have a desecration demon and I can't find it. I'll find it tomorrow. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:21

Permalink

Id have to say the mealstrom pulse and an engineered explosives

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:22

Permalink

If you want them just in case id take out the above.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:23

Permalink

The above? What do you mean by that? But I really need engineered explosives against goblin decks and zoo and those types. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:29

Permalink

I meant the comment i put above. but in that case thrun. Yeah he's great but there's going to je more wrath of god over one that lets you regenerate him.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:44

Permalink

Okay. What about thrun and maelstrom pulse? :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:50

Permalink

Actually, I don't need them that much do I? Do you think should just forget them? :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:53

Permalink

Yeah that's what id take out of the sideboard. sorry about all the spelling errors my phone hates me sometimes. but with three pulses main the one in the side isn't really needed. And as i said its likely going to be wrath of god over something like day of judgment so you won't be able to regenerate thrun anyway

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:54

Permalink

I don't think the threads are really needed goyf will really be the only card worth stealing that's two casting. dark confidant really isn't worth it either i mean it speeds you up on cards but they likely won't kill it and let it kill you. its a great card that can really backfire.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:59

Permalink

Thanks! I put in thrun for control decks though I guess you're right it can be killed like that though I might be able to counter it. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 06:03

Permalink

Though darksteel plate may be an option to keep that from happening but in modern its more aggressive play. it looks like it'll do pretty good. if it doesn't just change it around a little to help against what gave it problems. i don't see much being problematic other than decks with a focus around exiling

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 06:12

Permalink

So I should put in darksteel plate or not? I'll go to bed now. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 06:15

Permalink

No i don't think so. i mean it'll protect something byt it will slow your whole strategy down.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 06:20

Permalink

I like this! Have you considered Necrotic Ooze?

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:19

Permalink

Do You think It would help? The only creatures I have with activate abilities are scavenging ooze and birds of paradise, but thanks so much! :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:23

Permalink

Hmm, maybe not so much haha, it just popped in my mind because it's one of my favorite ooze ^_^

-1
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:25

Permalink

Yeah, I love ooze. Sometimes I think OF make a deck where you give ooze all kinds of abilities like flying, Then you imagine a flying ooze A soaring blob going over your head and blobbing into a building. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:31

Permalink

It's like.. flying pudding! Yum...

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 05:32

Permalink

I like it a lot. I'm actually about to post a deck with predator oozes in it. I think that you might need another liliana, and of course be careful with cards like that, they can be dangerous if they fill your hand. I think that instead of the shock lands you'd do better with fetch lands. your deck is getting there, but isn't yet tournament worthy in my opinion. keep it up and tell me if you need anything else. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 07:20

Permalink

What would make it tournament worthy? Please tell me. I'm doing the lands last so that's why they're not so good, And what are the cards making it not tournament worthy? please tell me. Wait and I should put in another card that might harm me? :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:06

Permalink

The fetch lands cost a point of life but thin your deck out.they are expensive but typically a staple in tournament decks because they tap for mana and let you thin the deck out

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:12

Permalink

Nevermind they don't tap for mana but thinning the deck by letting you search for a color you need

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:14

Permalink

No no I know that fetch lands are good but I haven't got round to buying the lands to this deck. I might not want to use fetch lands because they cost like $60 a piece. Please tell me non-land cards That are making this deck bad. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:16

Permalink

Do you think it's worth it with their cost though? :)

1
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:19

Permalink

That is a good question i think they would help manage your colors and they work with the shock lands if you want to use them as well. If so i would definitely get misty rainforest and verdant catacombs. I think those are they only two that would work I'm not sure though. but yes i think they'd be a good buy for this.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:31

Permalink

How much would that cost in money though? And i actually normally do not need to thin out my deck much because some of the lands morph into creatures and if I'm saving a decay in my hand waiting for something I can play the garruk I just drew and play the abrupt decay cause I have enough land. Though they would help I know, But it would cost a lot of money. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:42

Permalink

What do you think I should add to this deck other than land. I can do the land myself, but I'm not as good at coming up with spells. The land I have right now are not the land this deck will have in it when it's ready. :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 13:48

Permalink

About 220 for twp each. and as for. blue cards maybe a couple draw or flyers

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 14:29

Permalink

You need to ease off the green mana costs. Make it a little bit more black. If you don't you'll have problems with liliana, predator ooze, desecration demon, and cards like that. I think that you should drop blue also. Sower is good, but there are better cards to use in its place. Desecration demon is too easily shut down in modern, so maybe try a demon of death's gate or something. I like the birds of paradise, eternal witness won't be useful at the start of the game and might need to go, (I'm sorry that I don't have replacements, I've never run a modern deck like this.) You'll need some shroud or hexproof if you want to survive anything, so try thrun, or something similar, and replace the countering spells with black boardwipe, (preferably effective black boardwipe, but that can be expensive) You don't need to worry about enormous creatures in modern tournaments, so inquisition is good. You'll want to be careful with the scavenging ooze, as it's only green mana and can easily be shut down be opponents. And finaly, Garruk relentless should not be in this deck. If you really want it, then only use one of them. Do you want me to recommend lands? Or would that overwhelm you...

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 17:50

Permalink

That's what I was thinking. I can do the land I just wanted to do the other stuff first. Do you think 2 thrun main deck would be good for sower? Do you think I should drop predator ooze? It that it costs 3 green in a multicolor deck. Maybe only 2 eternal witness? And I will take out blue, when this deck started I had more blue in it but parts of it changed and blue got worse and worse. Please tell me of cards that can replace desecration demon and please tell me of good creatures that could fit this deck. Thanks everyone! :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 23:38

Permalink

Ok. I'm thinking that you should drop predator ooze in favor of either spearbreaker behemoth, or asceticism to regenerate your powerful creatures. I honestly would drop vraska, and I would throw in another liliana. (liliana vess if you're having money issues.) the desecration demon should be replaced by a glissa the traitor. and maybe some lightning greaves if you can fit them. there are other cards that you could use, but I find these very useful. also, work on deck speed. some of these cards may slow you down, be careful with too many large creatures. I hope that this helped. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 07:01

Permalink

I think ascetecism costs to much mana, But I think You're right, I need something to save my guys. Is This better? Look at the deck to see, But please tell me of the cards that are slowing me down. Thanks! :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 12:48

Permalink

Ok, that's fine. I think that you should switch out two llanowar wastes and two overgrown tombs for 2 more forests and two more swamps. If you don't the fetch lands could slow you down. Also, only run one courser. And what are you planning on using Garruk for? most decks run red and will just kill him. All you'll get out of him is four mana for either a kill or a 2/2. So I don't know about it... If you're ready with lands, then try switching out a woodland cemetary for a mutavault. Start there. I think that predator ooze will slow you down in an aggro match, but kill in most others, except against cards like path to exile, that could be problematic. Tell me if you want any other advice. :)

0
Posted 05 March 2014 at 03:58

Permalink

Okay I can take out garruk, but I need a killing card in its place, I seem to need one. The reason I had him in is if I need to kill something I could use him and If not I could get a wolf. I kind of don't want to put in mutavault because It only taps for colorless but its ability is awesome! And why only one courser? Do you think I should have something in the SB to switch with predator ooze in aggro matches? I think that you are right that I should switch out some cards for basic land, but I don't want to many land that only tap for one color. Please tell me if you have more advice! :)

0
Posted 06 March 2014 at 02:14

Permalink

Okay! thanks. I want a card in garruk's place that can kill a card on the turn I play it though. And why one courser? I think maybe I should switch a swamp for the mutavault? please tell me of a card I can put in my SB for predator ooze against aggro. Thanks, any more help would be great! :)

0
Posted 06 March 2014 at 02:20

Permalink

courser can be nice, but just isn't enough in modern. And I guess that you can switch swamp for mutavault, but I'd be careful with fetch lands... You should really check out my new american control deck! It's awesome.

0
Posted 08 March 2014 at 20:47

Permalink

actually forget what I said. You can use fetch lands for the overgrown tomb as well. You're fine.

0
Posted 08 March 2014 at 23:40

Permalink

I'm not sure about this but maybe nightveil specter

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 14:04

Permalink

Here is your problem, you want a Modern Tournament deck and almost all competitive modern tournament decks have fetch lands. What separates the winning decks from losing decks are tempos. One turn is often the difference between a win and a loss. 18 lands with 8 fetch lands is alright, 18 lands with 1 fetch land is broken. You will have mana problems. Also, 6 of your 18 lands come into play tapped, further adding to your problems. I know you asked to comment on things other than lands, but mana base (and sideboard) is what wins tournaments. All of your other cards could be AWESOME, but useless without the mana. Advice would be to temper your expectations, and add 4 more lands. And/or start investing in some fetch lands as they can be used for ANY deck. Meaning, if you want to try another tournament deck, you have your fetch lands to use as they are in MOST competitive decks. Also, your creatures are all over the place. Green, blue, and black. Desecration demons, kitchen finks, it doesn't really seem to fit together. What is your win engine? The ooze? It costs 3 green mana, again, goodluck getting 3 green mana, 2 blue, and 2 black with your mana base. Your creatures need work. I would stick to green and black. Not sure where to go as there are so many directions. I like your non creature spells though.

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 15:51

Permalink

Do you think 4 verdant catacombs? And You're right I should drop blue. Please tell me of more creatures for this deck. Thanks so much! :)

0
Posted 03 March 2014 at 23:40

Permalink

Your welcome. Yes 4 Verdant Catacombs for sure. Some cards that may fit: courser of kruphix, polukranos world eater, and I'm thinking Vraska the Unseen may be a better fit than Garuuk.

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 00:54

Permalink

Thanks! You've helped so much. Forgot polukranos! I love him, so I'll try to make him work. And Garruk has got me from bad places to good places very efficiently so I want to keep him, Though I can add vraska with garruk! One second I forget what courser of krupix is. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:29

Permalink

Okay! I'll test courser and the others, thanks so much! :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:31

Permalink

if theres blue in your sideboard, then why no blue lands?
I still think this would be a nice deck. since you only have 51 cards, how about you add some cards? perhaps jarad, golgari lich lord? I would also add thrunn, the last troll to the main deck as it synergies nicely with this deck.

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 00:29

Permalink

Thanks! Sorry, I was in the middle of changing this deck when I had to go. That's why all the things were weird. I forgot jarad, I'll test him out and I was about to add thrun and take out blue. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:26

Permalink

Does anyone know what the green-black god pharika does? And Could someone tell me of a few more land for this deck? :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:37

Permalink

Pharika is not out yet

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:46

Permalink

Maybe golgari rot farm

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:52

Permalink

I know. I was wondering if anyone had found information. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 03:59

Permalink

Oh ok I do not know about pharika but I bet it sol have something to do with +1/+1 counters

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:07

Permalink

Okay, I think I'll order some of the cards now, but only the for sure ones. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:14

Permalink

Julian would you mind checking out my new standard deck I need help with it

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:16

Permalink

I either am putting in polukranos or desecration demon. Please help. And should I add another predator ooze? And all of you that helped, thank you, this deck runs so much smoother. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:31

Permalink

I say demon because 1 it takes over the board 2 not a legend so you can have more 3 in my opinion polukronos monstrous is not good In this deck also since your running no blue now take blue out of the sideboard

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:34

Permalink

Oops Forgot again. I will keep demon and take out polukranos! :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:46

Permalink

Also 1 card remaining maybe another walker or dd?

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 04:56

Permalink

Yeah, I can't decide. Which do you think? :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 05:43

Permalink

I would say a demon

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 05:55

Permalink

Okay. Thanks. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 06:00

Permalink

Okay everyone, Now do you think this is tournament quality, Or not? Please tell me of any changes that can be made to make this better. And Now we move on to the Side Board, I have a lot more to do there. Thank You so much everyone who commented and replied this runs so much smoother and is much more efficient than before. :)

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 23:38

Permalink

Well what I would do is play it for a bit then see what problems you have then go fix those

0
Posted 04 March 2014 at 23:59

Permalink

Okay, do you think I should buy it then take the problems with it then buy cards for the SB that could help. Is this deck good enough to buy yet? :)

0
Posted 05 March 2014 at 00:05

Permalink

I would probably buy it if I had the budget(meaning I'm not rich) but I think you should buy the cards for main deck then buy the sideboard this deck could have problems with control

0
Posted 05 March 2014 at 00:13

Permalink

Okay! thanks that is what I was planning to do. The reason I am going to buy it soon is I already have garruk, liliana, abrupt decays, maelstrom pulses, one thoughtseize, a few of the land, greaves, birds, 1 desecration demon, and eternal witness. Then I have a little over $200 dollars in store credit on a website, so There is not to much left to get. Thanks! :)

0
Posted 05 March 2014 at 00:56

Permalink

Do you think I should add another desecration demon? I used one for one of the first times and it kicked bum. But I can't figure out what to take out. :)

0
Posted 05 March 2014 at 02:36

Permalink

I need something against flyers. Please tell me of some! :)

0
Posted 06 March 2014 at 02:04

Permalink

Add a couple bitterblossom! its unbanned now:)

0
Posted 06 March 2014 at 02:19

Permalink

Oh good Idea! It's really expensive, but I'll try to manage it. What about putting in raking canopy in SB for now? And would bitterblossom be in main deck or SB? One last thing, If a token dies could I exile it with scavenging ooze? If I can than bitterblossom would be great! :)

0
Posted 06 March 2014 at 02:26

Permalink

I know tokens hit the grave then fade but I'm not entirely sure about using scavenging oozing it. bitterblossom would be main all the way. Its definitely main deck worthy. cheap casting puts tokens that fly in and takes flyers down. i know its expensive but id suggest at least 3. Its a simply overpowered card

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 02:11

Permalink

8 think you can because the tokens hit the grave for a second

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 03:24

Permalink

Okay so just when they die I can do it. And what about grave pact it would kill with bitterblossom. :)

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 03:32

Permalink

But what should I take out for bitterblossom and maybe grave pact? :)

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 03:33

Permalink

Sorry I've been really busy. id take out an abrupt decay and a finks for two bitterblossom.

0
Posted 14 March 2014 at 13:33

Permalink

Or just drop finks all together and put three bitterblossoms which would be better

0
Posted 14 March 2014 at 13:36

Permalink

I like both of them, but I don't want three bitterblossom. :)

0
Posted 15 March 2014 at 04:09

Permalink

Please tell me of cards that can get rid of mirran crusader, It is so annoying. And cards that rid me of other hexproof cards or cards with protection. What about phyrexian obliterator? :)

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 00:02

Permalink

Obliterater would be a bit hard to cast..maybe glaring spotlight for tthe sideboard instead

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 02:13

Permalink

Oh would that work for mirran crusader? that's great thanks! :)

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 03:30

Permalink

Also gut shot would work

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 03:33

Permalink

I would have to have two though... thanks! And do you think grave pact would be good in this deck? It's just so good if they have a desecration demon or a dragon and nothing else and you have grave pact down you can topdeck a birds and it will be just as good as anything else. :)

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 03:36

Permalink

No glaring spotlight won't deal with the crusader but takes hexproof away

0
Posted 07 March 2014 at 06:11

Permalink

Do you think grave pact then? It deals with both. :)

0
Posted 08 March 2014 at 18:34

Permalink

Yes grave pact is good

0
Posted 08 March 2014 at 18:50

Permalink

Yes definitely. maybe creakwood liege as well to spawn tokens and give a boost to your creatures

0
Posted 08 March 2014 at 22:08

Permalink

What should I take out? Thanks :)

0
Posted 09 March 2014 at 17:42

Permalink