larsullberg

138 Decks, 167 Comments, 5 Reputation

Not really, but of course sometimes you get screwed. Mostly it only delays me a little bit

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 13:02 in reply to #151832 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

Stay original, thats cool! good luck!

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 08:44 in reply to #151794 on GW infect Rush

Permalink

sage of epityr is s nice card. Maybe not what you are looking for, but it's good.

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 08:42 as a comment on NO you cant play that

Permalink

To be honest, i think they suck! x)

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 08:36 in reply to #151788 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

And of course i forget something, add livewire lash! it is brutal.

And look at this deck if you want some ideas!

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=169887

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 08:29 in reply to #151794 on GW infect Rush

Permalink

first of all, you need more lands. I would remove mimic vat and prototype portal (although they are pretty cool) and add 4 inkmoth nexus, since you really cant play infect without it. The only reason to not have inkmoth nexus is if you get coloured-manascrewed, which i dont think will happen with this deck.

This a personal thing, but i would rather splash black then green and white, adding phyrexian vatmother, hand of the praetor, vampire's bite, virulent swipe and maybe plague stinger (these are just suggestions.). You could keep the white splash since tempering steel is very strong.

And with black you can add some much needed spot removal like doom blade etc.

hope i could help!

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 08:01 as a comment on GW infect Rush

Permalink

Just saw that you have memnite and ornithopter, so the glint hawk is pretty strong. But still you should try to add squadron hawk.

1
Posted 10 April 2011 at 06:53 in reply to #151769 on Holy backup plan Batman

Permalink

No squadron hawks? i thought they belonged to quest for the holy relic xD
on a serious note, rather than adding green, i think you should replace the glint hawk with swuadron hawk.

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 06:51 as a comment on Holy backup plan Batman

Permalink

Yes it does, and it is often absolutely gamechanging.

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 06:45 in reply to #151760 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

I highly suggest splashing either red or white. Both steppe lynx and plated geopede are very strong, and cheap, in a landfall deck. Also with red you can add some burn, which this deck doesn't really have.

I have tried to make a budget landfall deck myself, check it out and comment if you want to!

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=170317

0
Posted 09 April 2011 at 22:05 as a comment on Budget Landfall

Permalink

but gideon has more uses, which makes him better. Coupled with tumble magnet he can kill a creature, with a tainted strike he can win the game in pretty much one turn, and his first skill leaves the opponent without any defence. On one card! I think gideon is better, definitively.

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 19:55 in reply to #151356 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

Sunblast angel + gideon jura is the combo the angel is meant for.

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 18:31 in reply to #151356 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

I think it looks pretty good actually. a fun theme. the only cards i could see you using is golgari grave-troll and maybe disentomb.

good work!

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 11:54 as a comment on From the Grave

Permalink

I think you should have explore, it is really good and cheap. and also evolving wilds for the same effect as terramorphic expanse.

im trying to make a budget landfall deck on my own, and i really need some advices, so if you get a chance please look at it and comment.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=170317

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 11:47 as a comment on Budget Landfall Deck

Permalink

i don't really know what to say, so i'll just say thanks!

Got any idea on how to fit in distortion strike?

Will check your deck out! =)

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 08:29 in reply to #151246 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

i think you should add searing blaze. Atleast i think its pretty good, and it can be very powerful!

I have tried to make a slightly modified version of your pauper landfall, and i would really appreciate som help if you got time! don't feel forced to do it though!

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=170317

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 21:57 as a comment on Facesmasher

Permalink

haha triple post :D how does it look now? (= bte i had steppe lynx but removed it to make it green and red only.

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 19:07 in reply to #151040 on Budget landfall (help)

Permalink

and take out what? (=

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 17:59 in reply to #151019 on Budget landfall (help)

Permalink

This deck is almost a 100 % experimental, so it aint that good.

But the advices you gave me are really good! I'm probably gonna make another infect deck using red instead. thanks alot!

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 17:54 in reply to #151004 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

What do you think about the deck otherwise?

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 07:22 in reply to #150706 on UWB infect/control

Permalink

81-100 of 165 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last