Will you please stop spamming other peoples' decks to get attention?
Permalink
If you'd bothered to read the comments, that same thing has been said about 3 times. Doesn't even matter. What are the odds that someone is going to run a card like that? If anyone designed their deck to be 100% advantageous against one deck, it's going to win. That can be said about any deck with any sort of weakness, which is just about every deck, not just this one. Sorry for getting defensive, but I don't go around commenting on burn decks saying "LOL WITCHBANE ORB DESTROYS THIS DECK"
Correct, especially experimentally, it can vary endlessly. But yes, the odds are very high. Playing against a friend of mine, I successfully removed 14/15 of his 4/4 saprolings from combat using 2 lost in the woods.
I was being facetious. And this guy takes first turn win pretty seriously if my judgement is correct. Look at his decks.
I also need anything useful i can cast for < 3 mana
What do you guys think about adding blue? Maybe some cancels and Mind funeral + any card that brings others from the graveyard to the battlefield?
...What?
Wow, thank you for the suggestion. It's going to take me a little while to finally sit down and go through all of the cards suggested in the comments to finally propose an updated and more efficient deck. Also, I took a silent vow to never use dark ritual. I personally think it takes much of the fun and strategy away from the game. After all, it was banned for a reason. But the future update will definitely yield interesting results.
It's not that people disagree with the strategy and combination this deck takes advantage of, its the simple matter of winning on the first turn. The odds simply just aren't reasonable. If this deck was renamed something other than "First Turn Win" it would actually be quite respectable.
*accept And they are not random probabilities. It's correct.
I also never said your deck was simple, just throwing that out there.
Maybe because the idea behind this deck was simple? I made it hoping it would spur some conversation, lo and behold, it did.
Also, your math is completely off. You obviously don't understand how probability works. Let me explain. First card drawn, you have a 4/60 chance of drawing Progenitus. Second card, 4/59. Third - 4/58. Fourth - 4/57. Fifth - 4/56. Sixth - 4/55. Seventh, assuming you drew one your sixth, 3/54. Add the last two draws given that you drew Progenitus both times, and you get a whopping 5.69%! Those are the HIGHEST POSSIBLE odds of you JUST drawing two Progenitus your opening hand. Imagine what the probability of getting ALL of the cards you need in your opening hand would be. This is why first turn win decks are retarted. But have fun!
Just because everyone has done it, or even thought about it, doesn't mean people don't want to talk about it, make suggestions, and share ideas on how to make this deck work better. It got top page because it's interesting, not because I'm a good deck builder.
No need, steel of the godhead serves the same purpose much better.
Didn't really take you much thought to make this deck, did it....
It's a very unstable combination.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=320323 I've actually spent some time making a deck around Lost in the Woods. You have to remember that this ability stacks because it triggers twice. If you have 2 lost in the woods out, you draw 2 cards for every attacking creature. If one of them is a forest, it gets taken out of combat. I honestly feel as though my deck has some consistency and legitimacy, so please feel free to check it out and criticize.
I think you guys have also forgotten about meddling mage...
No. Bant is a shard. Multicolored blue white green cards are bant.
1-20 of 35 items