Umoonpuca

0 Decks, 628 Comments, 300 Reputation

All good ideas. I just always tend to see WU from more of a control perspective, & Tutelage can be a real house, w/ no other mill whatsoever. I would be careful of putting too many things in the 4-drop slot, though.

0
Posted 30 November 2015 at 09:19 in reply to #567779 on UW Enchantments

Permalink

Only when I've had too much pumpkin ale...which is DELICIOUS. ;)

0
Posted 30 November 2015 at 07:57 in reply to #566697 on Infinite Mill/Damage Turn 3/4

Permalink

"This Guy"? Is that anything like being "That Girl"?

1
Posted 30 November 2015 at 07:52 in reply to #566186 on Infinite Mill/Damage Turn 3/4

Permalink

*2 other cheap, controlly enchantments: Tightening Coils, Claustrophobia.

0
Posted 30 November 2015 at 07:35 in reply to #567779 on UW Enchantments

Permalink

So, the problem I have w/ Starfield (& the reason, I assume, I always associate it w/ Theros block) is that to me, Theros block is where it belonged. Starfield will make itself & Sigil 5/5 creatures; other than that, you're only getting 2/2's & 3/3's (which will also be easier to remove, since you're adding the creature type). The problem I have w/ Sigil (such problems this person has!) is that it requires you to play enchantment heavy, a significant limitation when you're trying to control the board 'til you can make your own big moves. I would personally cut Planar Outburst, Ugin's Insight, Quarantine Field, & Starfield altogether, & run cheaper draw & more cheap control, possibly upping Sigil to x4. Awaken is in your colors, so that might be a thing, particularly w/ Halimar Tidecaller...the latter's only 3cmc, & there's plenty of spells w/ awaken for 1-3, so you'd lower your curve significantly. Don't know if any of this helps, but it's just some thoughts I had...good luck w/ your deck, whatever course you ultimately choose to pursue. :D

0
Posted 30 November 2015 at 07:28 in reply to #567779 on UW Enchantments

Permalink

So, aside from switching the lands, the only cards that HAVE to be boarded in (based on other lists I've seen) are Scapeshift, Snapcaster, & Elder; cards culled would be Emrakul, Storm, & I assume Explore, leaving the remaining choices discretionary. 2-decks-in-1 is the kind of shenanigan I love (the look on your opponent's face: priceless :D), & this looks well done; some filter lands might be good. +1.

3
Posted 30 November 2015 at 06:27 in reply to #568837 on 2 Decks in 1! Storm's a Comin'

Permalink

Sorry, whenever I see Starfield, I think Theros block. Busy right now, but I'll come back & take a look again later.

0
Posted 30 November 2015 at 02:17 in reply to #567779 on UW Enchantments

Permalink

Does it matter that the deck's no longer Standard? Or do you also want to change it so that it's Standard again?

0
Posted 29 November 2015 at 01:08 in reply to #567779 on UW Enchantments

Permalink

That does it...I'm doing a persist/undying/unleash/devour/Quillspike/Ion Storm deck!! :D +1.

0
Posted 28 November 2015 at 08:03 as a comment on Thromok HUNGRY

Permalink

Well, there's no way to cast Psychic Purge, either...but these are just in keeping w/ the theme of the deck, as no opponent would choose to have you discard them. Magicalez...I'm guessing you really, REALLY dislike being made to discard! ;)

0
Posted 27 November 2015 at 16:22 in reply to #568695 on Anti-Discard

Permalink

Defense of the Heart. ;)

0
Posted 27 November 2015 at 16:05 in reply to #568719 on Mono-green Tribal Wurms

Permalink

Furnace of Rath...or Overblaze. ;)

0
Posted 26 November 2015 at 01:34 in reply to #568627 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

"Hippie" music...how degenerate... ;)

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 20:45 in reply to #568250 on Library assholes

Permalink

I really like this deck. I'm not a fair judge of it's feasibility, but the pieces mesh well w/ each other, AND this is the first time I've come across a deck that exploits Storm's mill aspect in a Boros build, which in itself is a big + w/ me. This is the kind of deck I go out my way looking for on this site, so thanks for posting it, rough draft or no. (obviously, +1)

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 10:26 as a comment on Possimillity

Permalink

All I know is, it was hot at 4 likes/1 comment, but not at 3 likes/1 comment. But you're right...Northy is the ETB ability that triggers the algorithm. :)

1
Posted 25 November 2015 at 06:29 in reply to #568504 on Budget EDH: Mechanical Kraj

Permalink

THAT'S what I forgot to mention...targeting another creature in your GY to break the loop. But given there's only 7 creatures in this deck, using an instant in this case is probably a better bet...Comet Storm also works, but lacking R, your suggestion of Stroke of Genius would still get my vote. (Sorry about the deletions...I screwed-up when editing.)

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 03:58 in reply to #568463 on Buried alive

Permalink

Mountains & swamps? ;) All kidding aside, deciding what to cut to put in more lands (as Drakeraenes said, at least 4) would probably be a good next step, as it may clarify what your deck has/needs.

0
Posted 24 November 2015 at 16:48 in reply to #568143 on Ur' better off dead

Permalink

Wow! There's a lot of new stuff going on here!! At this point, I think I'd like to see your 2 Sidisi MB, along w/ 4x Gravecrawler. With the addition of the 4 lords, you can probably remove the Heralds at this point; additionally, Drudge Spell, & possible 2 Kjeldoran Dead? (You've also got me thinking about flying zombies now! :D)

0
Posted 24 November 2015 at 15:43 in reply to #567641 on I'll make slaves of your bones

Permalink

There's Consume Spirit...all but 1 mana spent on it has to be B, but once you start the loop, that won't matter. I also like MM's suggestion, particularly as it's one I haven't heard before...or am I just outside of the loop? (insert groan) :)

0
Posted 24 November 2015 at 11:40 in reply to #568463 on Buried alive

Permalink

Ashling the Pilgrim is another low casting-cost R Legend, w/ an ability that could prove useful; Brion Stoutarm (also a R Legend) would give you a sac outlet w/ lifelink, if you're still contemplating that. This is actually one of my favorites among your decks, because of all the interactions you have going on (not unusual for you, but not as often seen in "Deathrender decks"). Left +1 back when I first saw it, just popped back in to comment. :)

0
Posted 24 November 2015 at 00:32 as a comment on Rendered Dead

Permalink

201-220 of 625 items