Aliski

"What is the point of tapping permanents when my goal is to finish the game 1 one attack with an unblockable creature"
THE FUCKING POINT IS THAT U CAN FUCKING TAP 2 FUCKING LANDS AND FUCKING CAST IT FOR FUCKING FREE FUCKS!!!!!! FUCK DUDE...U CAN'T UNDERSTAND THAT?

U wont need the cipher shit, u just use it because its free to play, that means that your cyclops will gain 3 power and you will still have 2 lands to make others spell. Or you can even tap your oponents lands, assuring that he can't counter cause he wont have any lands to cast a counterspell.

And by the way, uncovered clues sucks

Well..the meaning for lingering is that u can put 4 tokens with 5 mana.
U can flashback it when u need creatures on the bf,right?
Thats the deal ;D

Haha yeah, I was thinking of them too !

For real?
Dude..You still didnt take that fucking ring of wishes out. That card doesnt do shit!
Everybody said it to you and it took 100 comments for you taking it out.

The original Izzet Blitz deck by travis woo doesn't even run hidden strings because it has a full playset of artful dodge. Hidden string is bad choice too especially because you're running so many flashback cards you dont even need the cipher proc. need i remind you that cipher only procs when you deal combat damage too so you can only tap blockers afterwards when you''re already past the combat stage as well as that Hidden strings isnt even instant speed.

You really dont understand this card, right?
You think that when u cast it, it will only resolve when I attack and sucessfuly damage my oponent? I cant believe how people are...
Ok, let me explain it to you:
You cast it. If you oponents doesnt counter it, you can tap/untap 2 permanents. THEN u cipher it. You attack, if you do dmg, u cast it for free and tap/untap 2 another permanents.
Is that dificult?

Some shit with persist maybe? Idk if exists..but whatever
Duress is good also
Wrench mind?

Too dificult to cast ;/ BBB

Thanks dude ;P

Drop sublime archangel and drop healer of the pride
Linggering souls is good here
Voice of resurgence too, if you can afford it.
I guess if you do that, it will definitly be a good deck ;P

Take a look and comment on mine please, I need some advices too haha
http://www.mtgvault.com/aliski/decks/loosing-but-winning/

And I believe u should add Sign in blood instead of geth's verdict/diabolic edict. U can always sideboard it back in the second game, so... A draw card is always good to have in hand

Maybe you should add more lands..
But is a pretty solid deck!
All creatures will do an impact when hit/leave the bfield, pukse tracker can deal 1 dmg and then be sacrificed to give +2/+2 for the vampires,the skeleton activates its exalted to the vampire and can be sacrificed to give even more power to the vampires.
Yeah...I guess its playable in pauper.
Maybe some sideboard for midgame is good too. I got one monoblack pauper.
Please check it out. There's some cards u can use here. Like tendrils of corruption,corrupt,spinning darkness, even pirexian rager can get a place here..
http://www.mtgvault.com/aliski/decks/dark-pauper/

I would add evolving wilds instead of guildgate. You really dont want to draw lands when u already reached 3-4 on the field.
Pike is great too, but I've tried to play with it in this deck and it didnt worked as planned. I prefer to add some draw power, or something like index.

Ok, I added 2 shocks and 2 index. It works really good. Index is great for the beggining

Dont I? dude..I will cast the card, if it resolves I can untap/tap two permanents, then I cipher it in a creature. I attack. If I deal dmg with the creature that has hidden strings ciphered, I cast it for free and got to untap/tap two another permanents...
Is it wrong? If it is, please explain it to me ;D

http://www.mtgvault.com/aliski/decks/izzet-combo-17/

Take a look and comment please

Useles? He isnt for late game purpose dude...You play him for nothing...If you got an electromancer on the field u play it and gain 1 mana extra..
How could it be useless in a deck where u need to cast a few spells to make the combo??

Of course, I already had said on the above comment.
This decks aren't for tournments, they are for fun, to win against $300 decks with a $20 one

The link is this one..
http://www.mtgvault.com/aliski/decks/izzet-combo-17/

Standard...

Pretty nice idea. Still..10 creatures is a little low. U could add nivix cyclops or goblin electromancer

Thanks Holz.Yeah, maybe index will have a place here, one mana for that is good enough, I guess...