AzraelTheSlain

412 Decks, 373 Comments, 67 Reputation

Oh, but, I do like the Terry Goodkind reference.

0
Posted 03 November 2010 at 01:18 in reply to #96865 on Wizard's Fire

Permalink

Errr...
Galvanic Blast doesn't live up to its full potential. Maybe replace it with Lightning Bolt?

0
Posted 03 November 2010 at 01:17 as a comment on Wizard's Fire

Permalink

Very nice idea. I especially like the fact that this is a misleading deck when your opponent plays against it. As soon as Braids pops out, they'll think "Oh, a Stompy, no big deal". As soon as they start putting out their creatures, artifacts or what have you, they'll notice something is very, very wrong when they see the wand. For free. Then begins the tide of damage as you counter, burn and pretty much reduce them to a weeping mess. That is, IF you get all of your needed creatures and artifacts out for the combo.

7.4/10

0
Posted 10 October 2010 at 20:32 as a comment on Braided Bone-Wand

Permalink

Y'know, a lot of folks would probably be willing to concede after taking this kind of mindf@#k.
Except there's one problem with this deck: The main things it relies upon are somewhat expensive in most terms. Not to mention, in SoM, you're looking at a lot of artifact hate, so since it takes a mere 1R to Shatter a Chalice...

Don't get me wrong, I love deck ideas like this, meant to simply piss your opponent off and force them out of the game. BUT, the reliance on the artifacts (Mindslaver and Chalice in particular) is really going to hurt this deck. Also, I'm not sure how effective your Trinket Mages are, considering there's only one artifact they can fetch for you. Consider a Spellbomb, possibly, just for the card draw and the Mage. Not to mention, doing that would let you REALLY use your scrying to its full advantage.

I'd hate to see this deck in motion, but even more, I'd hate to see it meet a RDW in combat.

7.1/10

0
Posted 10 October 2010 at 20:27 as a comment on Mindlock

Permalink

Oh, and Putrefax + Distortion Strike + Vines of Vastwood = DEATH
Nope, no other way to put it, just DEATH. In one DAMN turn.

0
Posted 03 October 2010 at 10:19 as a comment on My Take On Infect

Permalink

No, pretty sure he means 'lenses', since he's referring to multiples.

0
Posted 03 October 2010 at 10:16 in reply to #90212 on My Take On Infect

Permalink

Of all the weird, creepy and WTF moments I've seen, putting an entire herd of Pegasus onto the Altar to feed a gigantic Banefire is pretty damn out there. Great job, yours is without a doubt the winner.

0
Posted 03 October 2010 at 07:40 as a comment on Not Expected to Happen

Permalink

Wow, looks like I just missed this post by a moment.

0
Posted 02 October 2010 at 14:27 in reply to #90080 on Scrapmetal

Permalink

Could be he's going by T2 standards.
Especially judging from the fact that all there is in here is Scars of Mirrodin.

0
Posted 02 October 2010 at 14:27 as a comment on Scrapmetal

Permalink

Well, I only have one Metalcrafting card. I use my artifacts mainly for the same thing you do, to fling them at people in a blind rage until they stop moving. Liquimetal is mainly there for me to turn evem my creatures into artifacts so I can toss them at you too.

0
Posted 02 October 2010 at 12:40 as a comment on It's So Shiny...

Permalink

I really wish. Sadly, if you read Sanguine Bond;
"Whenever you gain life, target opponent loses that much life."

The part that sucks about that: Loss of life won't trigger Tamanoa, like I wish it would. However, the combo is still one way for them, so whenever they get burned, I gain, then they lose more. So, in effect, I double their damage while gaining the initial life. Thank you for the comment, though, Iscalisi.

0
Posted 29 September 2010 at 04:17 in reply to #89501 on Spirit of Life

Permalink

Wait, wait, wait.
Creature destruction a Zombie weakness?!?
If anything it's a great advantage, no weakness at all.

However, your Flying point is pretty correct. Zombies pretty much hate flying, which is why the sacrifice mechanics help that. Interesting deck, though, and surprised not to see any sacrifice Zombies in here.

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 19:51 as a comment on Zombie Strike and Counter

Permalink

I checked it out when you first made it, Lilz. Interesting deck idea.

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 19:30 as a comment on It's So Shiny...

Permalink

Hmm, very good point.

Although, maybe if I add some more counterspells.... :D

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 17:17 in reply to #89312 on Battle of Attrition

Permalink

I don't know about unplayable...
And BoP costs some pretty ridiculous money, Tomathan, was aiming for mostly lower-priced cards.

But yeah, was a S&G deck, got a little bored. Felt like the Hellions because they're not often used and I happen to like the Blitz Hellion. Although, to make it more playable, the Rootbound Crag would make a nice addition. Then again, this thing needs a little bit more to be playable, which I grant it is lacking.

0
Posted 28 September 2010 at 05:06 in reply to #89308 on Helluva Time

Permalink

Y'know... Contagious Nim would be a good addition to the Zombie deck, especially one that's multipurpose.

0
Posted 27 September 2010 at 05:39 as a comment on The Zombies MK I

Permalink

Well, since standard is getting ready to rotate, there's a new Vampire in game. In fact, he's the only real vampire there's been since before Zendikar's Twinklepires. Only problem is, you'd need more Artifacts to use him to your advantage.

Other than that, the only thing I see wrong is that you have more Pulse Trackers than Nighthawks. Nighthawk is a much better card, I'd say nix the Pulse Tracker, he's got a weak ability.

0
Posted 27 September 2010 at 05:38 as a comment on Standard Vampires

Permalink

Again, I forget Terminate. Thanks, Marcus.

0
Posted 26 September 2010 at 13:33 in reply to #89086 on Haze of Specters

Permalink

So, um, did you plan to ever get anything done with this deck?
While this deck is trying to get together and hit something, it's going to be hit pretty hard by a well-constructed deck. I would suggest a more central theme other than just "black creatures", because that's VERY broad.

1
Posted 26 September 2010 at 12:59 as a comment on vamps

Permalink

*grins*

Thanks, Aaboy, glad you like it. Besides Phyrexia, I've always loved the Specters, and wanted to make a deck of them. The only reason I didn't add Blightning, for one reason: Every creature causes the opponent to discard. So, instead of adding spells that make them discard, I decided to make spells that make them draw. What better than Sign In Blood? I do appreciate the suggestions and the exuberant commentary. :D

0
Posted 26 September 2010 at 12:50 in reply to #89069 on Haze of Specters

Permalink

221-240 of 365 items