AzraelTheSlain

412 Decks, 373 Comments, 67 Reputation

I have to admit, this deck is... Frazzled.
Also, Green is my least favorite and Blue is one of my favorites, surprisingly. :D
This deck needs some serious guidance in theme.

0
Posted 10 September 2010 at 20:40 as a comment on U/G deck

Permalink

You forgot one "Yes".
"Yes, this is damn expensive."

0
Posted 10 September 2010 at 20:36 as a comment on Ach! Dragons! Run!

Permalink

You're going to have an issue with that, considering you're not using Slivers, for one, and that there really is no card that will give your cards polychromatic protection. I'd just suggest sticking it out with Brave the Elements, use your whites as defenders when the issue is brought about. BUT, if you're not worried over Standard conditions, you could Imprint the Isochron Scepter (MI) with BtE and you could have polychromatic protection for your whites every turn.

And suggestion number two: the Inquisition of Kozilek is 'okay', but you know what's better and costs the same? Duress (M11). No CMC requirement on it, so all the better.

Lastly, the Kor Firewalker: What's he doing in there? Only Protection from Red is too specific, considering you could be facing any color deck. This makes the reliance on a Pro - Red card pretty terrible, unless you can turn the opponent's permanents red.

Rating: 7.2/10

0
Posted 09 September 2010 at 18:43 as a comment on Protected (HELP)

Permalink

Pretty good idea, but two words: Basilisk Collar.
Basilisk Collar + Cunning Sparkmage = Scary

0
Posted 08 September 2010 at 18:18 as a comment on Ding em' Ping em' Fling em'

Permalink

xD
One of the best Theme decks ever, considering what it's based on! (Where's the Boulder?)
And there of course IS a Skull, it just doesn't fit, really. :D

For sheer greatness of theme, it HAS to have a 10/10.

0
Posted 08 September 2010 at 18:13 as a comment on Jonesin'

Permalink

Yeah, I'm more of a casual player, but every once in areat while, there's a good reason to make a standard deck. Nighthawk + Sanguine Bond is part of that reason. Thanks for the comment and the rating, man. :D

1
Posted 07 September 2010 at 19:18 in reply to #85926 on Azzy's Vampirism

Permalink

I appreciate the suggestions, man, and the rating.

0
Posted 06 September 2010 at 18:54 in reply to #85824 on Fight Knight

Permalink

Gobblin' Goblin? Frank Zappa fan? xD

I like this, with the exception of your non-Goblin buddy, the Pyromancer. Not a Goblin, so kind of lowers the deck in my opinion. Maybe add Goblin Sharpshooter instead?

7/10

1
Posted 06 September 2010 at 18:51 as a comment on Gobblin' Goblin

Permalink

Oozes! (no not those kind)
Let's admit it; we don't see enough of them.
Sure, they're in the occasional deck, but not in full force like this.
The only thing I can think to add to the oozyniess of it is something to bring back those Oozes that go down the drain. Nature's Spiral maybe?

Sweet deck (besides the high mana curve), 8.2/10.

0
Posted 06 September 2010 at 18:46 as a comment on Mutagen-X

Permalink

Okay, first, it's not exactly a full-fledged Vampire deck (THANK GOD). While I like some of the additions you've made (Nantuko Shade chiefly), some of it just isn't necessary. For example: Platinum Angel. If you're running Death's Shadow in here, you're expecting to be getting them to 10 - life as soon as possible. So why put in an artifact with a win ability? Much better using the Blade of the Bloodchief.

Next, we address the seeming lack of Diabolic Tutors. One?! No, no, if you're going to run Tutors in there, you're going to want at least 2, preferably 3. I also noticed you put Suffer the past on the sideboard. Good choice, but you might want some Sanguine Bonds to match.

One the plus side, you do have plenty of Nighthawks, a great multipurpose card. Another negative, though, is the Demon of Death's Gate. What's he doing there? Not near enough graveyard action to utilize him fully, unless you really dislike your Vampires that much. A last word on the Barony Vampire: not worth the cost, man. He's too much mana, not enough anything.

Lastly, your mana curve is actually pretty nice. Except for the 7 - 6 mana cards. Ouch.
Overall, 5/10.

0
Posted 06 September 2010 at 18:15 as a comment on Black Vamp Deck (Newbie)

Permalink

The mana curve is kind of rough (though some of the higher cost ones are admittedly Convoke cards).

0
Posted 06 September 2010 at 14:31 as a comment on Fungus Among Us

Permalink

8.9

0
Posted 06 September 2010 at 14:03 as a comment on Arm the weak

Permalink

Why not Scatter the Seeds instead of Even the Odds?

0
Posted 06 September 2010 at 04:35 as a comment on Arm the weak

Permalink

This deck...
*facepalm*
Vampires. AGAIN, Vampires.
AND yet again, no Sanguine Bond used.

0
Posted 05 September 2010 at 12:24 as a comment on Killer Vamp

Permalink

Hmm, interesting. I was always told that it wouldn't be affected by 'putting a token into play'. My bad.

Player since 1996
And still learning...

0
Posted 05 September 2010 at 11:45 as a comment on Elven intruder

Permalink

ROFLMAO Mogg Maniac!
This is a very interesting deck, to say the least.
And OUCH, Recurring Nightmare. I really can't think of much more other than to say that the Phoenix cards are great, and maybe consider the Worldheart Phoenix. 9/10

0
Posted 04 September 2010 at 21:02 as a comment on Apocalypse Rebirth

Permalink

Also, might I suggest Leyline of Anticipation? Pretty effective for this setup.

0
Posted 04 September 2010 at 20:53 in reply to #85450 on Elven intruder

Permalink

Erm, well....
Intruder Alarm has the phrase " Whenever a creature comes into play".
The problem with this and the Perfect is simple: When you tap for a Elf Token, you're PUTTING a Token into play, as opposed to the creature "coming" into play. However, you certainly have plenty of creatures to trigger the Alarm.

0
Posted 04 September 2010 at 20:51 as a comment on Elven intruder

Permalink

For playing for 'only' a year, it's actually a pretty decent deck, though the mana curve could use some work.

0
Posted 04 September 2010 at 20:47 as a comment on Black Nightmare/resurrect deck

Permalink

LOL yeah I know, not really the best deck, but he wanted Cute, he got cute and maddeningly ineffective. xD

0
Posted 04 September 2010 at 20:42 in reply to #85437 on Beeblification

Permalink

301-320 of 365 items