Jund Jund Jund

by drumhead21 on 28 July 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Sorceries (2)


Instants (3)


Planeswalkers (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Or how about dun dun dun.... ha ha. Most of you know how this theme works; use Bloodbraid Elf or Bituminous Blast to cascade into Maelstrom Pulse or Blightning for free, just wanted to post a Jund deck for a buddy.

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

23
Likes

This deck has been viewed 12,680 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

00272726

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Jund Jund Jund

Why is spellbreaker there? The only thing it protects is itself.

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 14:18

Permalink

annnd... that is bad how? last I heard, an uncounterable 5/5 for 1RGG is preet damn good. . I personally don't think it deserves a spot here, but you don't see me losing my pants over it. if you're too stuck up to let people build their own damn decks, then simply leave, we don't want you here.

1
Posted 31 October 2011 at 19:58

Permalink

if there are two then the deck will be fine and it is a great fit jund just wants to hit you as hard as it can and as quick as it can, did you notice the number 2 by it? this deck can bring it back if need be but the way that he has built it he wont have to worry about it getting destroyed.

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 03:00

Permalink

Because i can play it for free.... 5/5 for free... anyone...anyone.... yes, 5/5 for FREE!

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 14:20

Permalink

It adds nothing to the deck, I'd be pissed if I cascaded into a 5/5 that does nothing for me.

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 14:38

Permalink

I donno, i've managed to punch people on a regular basis with it and it's pretty damn effective. You must be one of those people who think Juzam Djinn is bad...

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 14:59

Permalink

Actually for a long time it was amazing. But you obviously know nothing about me or how long I played so keep stupid comments like that aside. Spellbreaker isn't worth a slot in here, I'd rather have Sarkhan the Mad or Garruk Or even lightning bolt in it's place. But obviously you should keep playing cards without synergy, because Magic isn't won by cards that work together but by big creatures.

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 16:07

Permalink

Someone got their panties in a twist, sad face. The Juzam Djinn reference was to hopefully get you to realize why a cheap 5/5 is good, but you didn't absorb that, you took it as an insult, which is fine, people are entitled to their opinion. I totally agree with you on the Lightning Bolt idea, but i also made this deck in about 5min, so i wasn't going for pure awesomness. Like the description above states, I built it for a buddy to see what it was about. As for your last statement, big creautres do win magic, look at the dark depths and hexmage thing combo If you plan to reply, which is fine, I'd expect you to have a bit more of a broad view of what's going on and not a narrow view of what you think is correct. Jund v.s Jund, spellbreaker is much more eefective, especially if you only hit it with a lightning bolt.

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 17:01

Permalink

Except they would hit it with a pulse or a terminate or tons of lovely removal. It's a bad card for this deck and has no synergy. Big creatures alone don't win, Dark Depths and Hexmage only work if you can stop the person from bouncing or pathing the token. For someone who thinks they know what they are saying, you have no idea what actually wins games. It's not the creatures alone, but the support and synergy between them all. And building a deck in 5 minutes isn't an excuse, I've built Jund in a 5 minutes and it was better than this.

0
Posted 28 July 2010 at 21:37

Permalink

Seriously? Are we in 3rd grade? Fine dude, you win, you're the greatest magic player ever. Good for you. Rock on man...

4
Posted 29 July 2010 at 12:20

Permalink

Lol!

2
Posted 11 August 2010 at 15:42

Permalink

Epicly funny! kaim arouet has no funny bone... or at least i don't think he does. Afterall he did place 34th at states, he is good, but does he have to be cocky? not so much... i'm pretty sure drumhead21 could take him...

0
Posted 09 November 2010 at 20:07

Permalink

Not to beat a horse that seems to already be dead, but is Kaim seriously arguing that someone shouldn't play a creature because it could be removed/killed? That may be the dumbest argument of all time. That's even worse than people saying a deck is weak to extraction--every deck is weak to extraction, that's the point of it. With this deck, I'd love to cascade into a spellbreaker, have them waste a terminate on it, and show them the broodmate next turn.

3
Posted 31 October 2011 at 02:38

Permalink

Trololololol! It was so funny reading this. Pretty decent deck, +1 from me

0
Posted 31 October 2011 at 07:04

Permalink

TheChurchIsHere is absolutely right. I would love to cascade into spellbreaker. Think about it this way:

I am playing U/B (One of my favorite color combinations) and I am facing this deck. They cast Bituminous Blast. A single removal card on my deck? no big deal. I elect to not counter that. So I deem that I'd most likely, rather counter the card they cascade into. They begin cascade, hit Spellbreaker...

I am screwed out of it now.

The spellbreaker does have synergy because he can't be countered. I would rarely counter the bloodbraid, because I want to remove a good card from their deck and leave the elf to my cheap removal spells. The counters are saved for the big guns.

Bloodbraid = no counter
Bloodbraid = Go for the throat

Bituminous Blast = no counter
Bituminous Blast = Disemtomb

Either way, It is better to counter the big guys, and not the cascaders. but Spellbreaker throws a wrench in my plan when he is cascaded into. Get it?

1
Posted 31 October 2011 at 17:52

Permalink

Haha. Hey Kaim, I think recess is over boss. But this is interesting Drummer. Thanks for this. I think I understand why'd you need this. But like I said, still don't understand the Archenemy thing all the way. Looks cool though, nice job! 8.8 stars, just because, "You obviously don't know what wins Magic games!" lol

0
Posted 29 July 2010 at 13:18

Permalink

This is just a jund deck (which apprently i have completely wrong, maybe you should check the grand master Kalm's decks and look at his jund stuff), but personally i hate jund, that's why my Jace Control deck stomps the shit out of it. Archenemy is cool twist on multi-player, if you really wanna know more about it, copy and paste this link; http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/91

0
Posted 29 July 2010 at 14:12

Permalink

Thanks for the link bro. Yeah, I'll check it out. And I'll become a devoute to the Way of Kaim. Sounds like an occultist religion from Command & Conquer or some shit, (I am Wiccan) but even THAT would be goin' too far, lol

0
Posted 29 July 2010 at 14:30

Permalink

Hey Spellbreaker Behemoth IS GREAT for just a 5/5 I went to "findmagiccards.com " and all other 5/5's that cost 4 0r less were like, Champions(in general) or they had a ability that made them slightly unwanted then at the bottem of the list there was Spellbreaker Behemoth who has a good ability.
yes I know that he is not the best monster to use without his ability but what the heck he wont hurt....
anyway its a okay deck :) good day

0
Posted 29 July 2010 at 14:56

Permalink

look everyone, its babys first Jund deck!!

0
Posted 31 October 2011 at 22:22

Permalink

Look everyone! it's an idiot who can't use apostrophes or properly use exclamation points!

1
Posted 01 November 2011 at 20:38

Permalink

Since legal's over. How bout throw in 2 x Galvanoth for a free Bituminous Blast?

0
Posted 01 November 2011 at 15:49

Permalink

FTW69 has deleted this comment.

Posted 01 November 2011 at 20:36

Permalink

too situational, and overall not worth it since galvanoth isn't really useable alone.

0
Posted 01 November 2011 at 20:40

Permalink

I think everyone know spellbreaker is a good card, kaim was just making a point that he didnt think it would fit into this deck he was just trying to be construcitve and HELP your deck, instead he is just getting shlt from bunch of other people anyways..... good deck i like it whether having spellbreaker or lightning bolt its all opinion both would fit the spot well

0
Posted 01 November 2011 at 23:35

Permalink

I'm sure he had all the berst intentions, but the fact is, he's a smug and generally rude person. he thinks he's all that ( "I've built a jund deck in 5 minutes that was better than this", "you obviously know nothing about me or how long I played so keep stupid comments like that aside" , "For someone who thinks they know what they are saying, you have no idea what actually wins games", need i list everything he ever said?)
I even took the liberty of looking into his decks to see if he was really the epitome of perfection as he felt that he was, the first thing I saw was him yelling about how new people aren't doing things right, and all sorts of "I am perfect and everyone else should accommodate to that" bullshit. the guy has some serious social problems, and maybe he is god like he acts, but he doesn't have to be so rude over it. I mean, you can disagree with something, but let people do things their way, whether it is "right" or not. it isn't going to hurt you.

0
Posted 02 November 2011 at 22:20

Permalink

Oh you're quite the charmer yourself, it seems.

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 05:16

Permalink

I can see the purpose of the Spellbreaker. And the only thing I have to say is it is very situational. With only 2 you are more likely to hit one of your "staple Jund" cards. I'm not saying that this is a terrible card in this deck. But in the 4 slot try thinking about Siege-gang commander or Master of the Wild Hunt. What made Jund so dangerous was that every spell in this deck had essentially 2 effects. That is what made jund so terrifying.

0
Posted 02 November 2011 at 00:45

Permalink

Looked over the deck for ideas as I was planning on running Jund for Modern, care to give it a once over?
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=255416

0
Posted 02 November 2011 at 23:29

Permalink

That's a really nice deck.

Please check an comment mine: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=230572

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 11:53

Permalink