gwd1096

10 Decks, 82 Comments, 3 Reputation

throw in 4 doom blades and four flame slashes and i would say its done.

0
Posted 09 February 2011 at 18:58 as a comment on Expensive

Permalink

i would prolly drop the Bala Ged Thief since they are the only allies in this deck. i would like to see this deck trimmed downed since its a little on the big side. you might also find that bloodcheifs' ascension might be some use to in this deck

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 14:09 as a comment on Discard

Permalink

Guul Draz Assassin, Nirkana Revenant, Pulse Tracker, Guul Draz Vampire, Malakir Bloodwitch are a few suggestions

1
Posted 30 January 2011 at 20:14 as a comment on standard vampire

Permalink

im not a fan of having onzies of things, but i think you need some flame slashes, burst lighting, pyromancers' ascension, painful quandary, bloodchiefs' ascension. Creatures: Kiln Fiend, liliana's specter

0
Posted 30 January 2011 at 20:04 as a comment on Burning Hand

Permalink

if you wanted to do it faster i would still suggest using the kiln fiend since it only cost 2 and it gets +3/+0 for every instant and sorcery cast, it doesnt have to hit the opponent like the spitfires. so you can stack them faster and dont have to worry about hitting the opponent with the spell

0
Posted 30 January 2011 at 18:49 in reply to #122513 on Red death

Permalink

im not a big fan of all the onzies you have in here. i think i would double up on some of the creatures and spells so you have a better chance of pulling them. and for a devastating spell id add a comet storm or two along with some reverberate

0
Posted 30 January 2011 at 14:25 as a comment on Red death

Permalink

goes both ways though. not the best card to have if your playing another burn deck, but i think you should drop the shock for burst lightning. Put in kiln fiend for another creature

0
Posted 30 January 2011 at 14:19 in reply to #122405 on red nuke

Permalink

i agree it would be nasty to play after stacking up a fiend and attacking, but what you propose that i take out?

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 22:42 in reply to #122260 on Burn you twice....Revised

Permalink

from what i hear you have to buy your deck online. via the website and make your deck that way online, but if you get a complete set they give you the option of getting the full set that you bought in physical form but if you do this then you loose all the virtual copies

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 15:23 in reply to #121829 on Burn you twice....Revised

Permalink

i agree with the bloodcheifs' ascension being put into here. but i would also consider putting in painful quandary even though this is not a discard deck. it makes them debate on life or having a hand. either way if your opponent has a hand they might not play a spell due to this and if their top decking then they have to wait a turn to play a spell so they can discard or just suffer the 5 life penalty

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:49 as a comment on Vampires

Permalink

Thanks man! And as far as Chandra goes i like having one of each because there abilities differ. and nalaar is cheaper than ablaze, but other than that no reason.

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:33 in reply to #122141 on Burn you twice....Revised

Permalink

Alright man, i like the way this deck works, but it seems a little big. I also dont know why you have the one lightning bolt, but i would prolly drop it and add another of something. Other things i would consider adding for red would be reverberates and for blue would have to be redirect and mana leaks.
Thanks for commenting on my deck!

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:29 as a comment on Red/Blue Burn/Semi-Control

Permalink

Im debating on dropping out the Cerebral Eruption from this deck which is on sideboard for big creature decks, and replacing them with something else. In your opinion whats a good cheap spell thats in standard that i might have missed?

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:23 in reply to #121943 on Burn you twice....Revised

Permalink

good to hear this deck works for other people besides me :)

Thanks for the comments guys!

0
Posted 29 January 2011 at 14:21 in reply to #121829 on Burn you twice....Revised

Permalink

mire's toll, duress, bloodchiefs ascension all cards i would consider. If you want to get rid of huanting echoes and still exile pic up leyline of the void. I would put the sign in blood in your main board though, once people figure out what your running they will try to start top decking as fast as possible so itll help fill there hand back up and help you search for cards if you need them. Come check mine out!
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=139513

0
Posted 27 January 2011 at 21:34 as a comment on Standard Discard

Permalink

i like the list of spells you have going here except staggershock. its too expensive in my opinion, and could easily play 2-3 spells in its place. I think that you should throw some valakuts in there to deal damage with lands in a longer battle, and besides that maybe add some reverberates to stack. If your using spells to stack then the kiln fiend is amazing....
Come check my burn deck out and tell me what you think:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=138509

0
Posted 27 January 2011 at 15:58 as a comment on standard burn

Permalink

Alright, this deck is very big... might want to put some of this main board on your sideboard. Im gonna have to say drop a few of the onzies that you have going on and pick up some quick fire spells and you could run Pyretic Ritual and Seething Song for fast mana boost. Come check out my burn deck and leave a comment if you dont mind :)
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=138509

0
Posted 26 January 2011 at 22:42 as a comment on Chandra's Minions

Permalink

i would if i had any, but i dont and i dont have $30 laying around to go buy 3 lol

0
Posted 26 January 2011 at 19:31 in reply to #119185 on Burn you twice....Revised

Permalink

talk about spamming........

0
Posted 25 January 2011 at 21:53 as a comment on COMMENT

Permalink

I like seeing old spells from invasion block. Thats when i started playing and i like seeing them, anyways your deck looks nice, but i dont know if you need more mana or not. I just made my first EDH and would like some advice.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=139163

0
Posted 25 January 2011 at 02:11 as a comment on Sek'Kuar, Deathkeeper EDH (comment)

Permalink

41-60 of 82 items