mymobbsdeep

i agree with remand, either that or mana leak!

Blightning can be pretty strong against burn, along with all your other discard. And you have ooze for a bit of life gain plus burn will have plenty of cards in the graveyard to exile. I think it looks solid man

this looks ridiculously fun to play. Definitely a thinking mans deck. Have you play tested? The only thing id change is, id run 2 thoughtseize and 3 inquisition. I know with all the shockland you probably don't want to take more damage than you have to, but i think id still do it.

ahhh. that makes sense, good point. I never thought of that! Happy you like faithless looting, looks like a pretty solid deck

cool man, looks good! i dont know of any off hand, but if you see something you like, feel free! thanks

iso only copies instants my friend

looks brutal, i look forward to trying to beat this some someday soon at an fnm or something. Good job

looks a little slow.. lol
why iso scepter? id drop it for 2 more sol rings cause why not

good lord this looks annoying. so many answers to whatever they play. well done

i think ensoul is a fantastic card in here, turn that free memnite into a 5/5 threat! Its a good alternative in the event you cant get emrakul out, that plus your burn might be enough to win. Also why not run 4 copies of dissolve and only two cancels? Dissolve IS a better cancel. Also i know Vapor snag isnt good if your planning on using it on your own creatures, but i think you would probably be using it in defense more than anything, so it might be worth it.

edit: faithless looting might be good in here too, could help you get that emrakul out of your hand since you really don't want to draw it

personally i think cemetery gate is better than the reesembling skeleton, since it lives through the pestilence and doesnt cost you mana to bring back. Id run 4 of it and only 3 of the skeletons. Also 4 dread seems like a lot, he very well might be sitting in your hand for awhile especially when running 3 kiss of death. Maybe drop one for a 4th drain life? Also maybe running 1 or 2 Urborg could be useful for helping your Coffers out. Anyway, nice deck, looks annoying!

yes, agreed!

Lol your welcome I think :)

Northernwarlord doesnt need help making a decent or good deck, hes been doing it for awhile and knows how to make a good deck. But when i looked at this, i thought it sucked. Just being honest, and he usually makes a pretty solid well rounded deck. But an aggro deck isnt aggro if it has to wait 3 turns to attack. So yea i was disappointed in him and all of you guys for not speaking up. Your right, saying it sucks doesnt help, i tend to type first and think later. An endearing quality of mine

"rich boy decks" haha. If your stuck making twelve dollar decks because thats all you can afford, id suggest leaving your 10 hours a week job at McDonald's and getting a better one lol. You can make a pretty solid deck for 50 bucks, which is less than a dollar a card. Even 30 bucks can make a solid deck. I work for my decks, and i am not comparing my decks to this, im saying thats its absurd that all these people who have checked out/liked this deck didnt point out that this is a slow ass aggro deck. An aggro deck without a possible turn one, or an explosive turn two play, isnt really an aggro deck. Its just a regular mid ranged deck with weaker creatures.

Lol :) don't be sorry. I understand the whole having a good hand thing, and not including huge bomb creatures, but this could easily be ten times better without increasing the cost much just by including some synergy. I'm just annoyed that all these people can look at this deck and yet give no advice. A deck like this wants about 12 one drops in it, because waiting until turn three to attack with a 2/2 is not fast. The fact that if they play a kraken hatchling or something, you really have no way to get around it. Perhaps include some creature enchantments so your burst damage is consistent

right on man!

how do you win 3v1 matches with this? Just trying to figure out how a control deck can beat 3 other players with only counter spells and zero 1 drops. I feel like if all three players played a one drop or two drop you should lose... cause controlling three people is damn near impossible. Just trying to figure out how this deck doesn't fall behind in the first couple turns. what do your friends play with?

and hokey, your not stuck making budget decks, you choose to. Because everyone immediately looks at this and thinks its cool. But no one buys it, no one cares about it, and no one thinks twice about it. Because it sucks. Its not aggro, its not good, and its not even fun to play. Its just different. and thats the hype right now, shit hole decks, that involve no skill to play, no money to have. Because no one uses decks like that. And for a reason. This deck is not fast and certainly not furious, its slow and not fun to play and easy as hell to beat. It sucks, save your 12 dollars and buy a six pack and some condoms, because there is no action here.

im confused, why is this good? every creature you have except one, is 2 mana or more. making this a slow aggro. not only that but every 2 drop creature needs something else Incorporated to be good. It just looks like a bunch of cheap creatures that are incredibly ineffective by themselves. lets hope you are playing another budget deck that hasn't heard of removal, because it doesn't look like this "aggro" deck is going to be doing any damage until turn 3. Its really just green and red creatures thrown together that dont get any bigger, have no synergy, and are only here because they share a color and cost 3 or less mana to play. Your biggest creature is a crappy 3/3 with a catch.. 12 likes, 6 comments, and 308 views and no one has told you this deck sucks? How has no one noticed this?