Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Here is a revamp of a deck I was working on originally called "Game of Godsend" and was looking to play at my local FNM. The link to the first 2 drafts is listed below. Unfortunately the deck did not do as well as I had hoped. In draft 1 (http://www.mtgvault.com/razial/decks/game-of-godsend-draft-1/) I had a problem with not having enough removal. With a little feedback I then created draft 2 (http://www.mtgvault.com/razial/decks/game-of-godsend-draft-2/) which I played tonight at the event. My guess is horrible luck with card draw because the biggest issue was just not getting what I needed, which was most of my removal. Even when side boarding I would never draw the necessary cards. The deck has plenty of scry, good creature base, and the mana is just right. Perhaps it was just a very unlucky night for me but going 2-3 just doesn't feel right for this deck. The only deck that was a real issue was Esper Control but if the cards I side boarded would have just shown up I would have been able to win. Anyway here is a quick revision from Draft 2. I main boarded Boros Charm, removed a Xenagos since I found he didn't do me much good so might remove the 2nd. Main boarded some shocks and replaced Nykthos with Mutavault. Please leave thoughts and do check out the first 2 drafts.
This deck has been viewed 11,574 times.
amazing deck probably 4 boros charm? do you think you can help me with my deck? Mono Black Aggro.
Permalink
play more godsends in main like 3 or 4
yeah, man. cause theres nothing better than drawing multiple legends, right?
yeah why not
It's not only legendary, it's an over costed legendary. 6 mana to give +3+3 and unblockable( lets face it this is what it does vs anyone with a clue). Satyr Piper could be something different, with the ramp from caryatid and filter from courser its more than enough ramp for your deck. you have 6 cards that cost 5 of greater(counting godsend) That frees up 4 slots for your deck.
do you know if godsend can activate heroic?
No because it has to be a spell that you cast and when you cast a equipment it only can be equipped after it is on the battlefield
ok thanks just wondering for heroic deck that im making
No problem glad I could help I have a heroic deck that I have made just hope it works have not had any one to test it against lol.
Get cockatrice. It is a self running magic online thing. Read more about it at woogerworks.com
Glad to see some activity already, thanks for the likes but please leave feedback if you feel it needs any work.
Godsend seems like a card that gets sided out in way too many matchups to be relevant
Seems like such a good card though. I had thought to remove it but feel it could work very well. When I do have it out which is about 50% of the time it really puts a halt on my opponents. It's something I would have to think about some more since you have suggested it. Thank you for the feedback.
id add hiliode for vigalence
lets see.. *I'd *Heliod *vigilance.. seriously in a 5 word sentence, people please.
super proud of you for being a douchefuck. add something to the conversation or kick rocks.
thankyou ninjastyle612 and could anyone give me feed back on the two decks i have before i order the cards please and thankyou
Your creature count seems way too low for Domri Rade to be worth the slots. Also, you should consider Chained to the Rocks as removal you can get with Ajani. If you want Godsend to be the centerpiece of the deck you should absolutely replace the Sylvan Caryatids with Elvish Mystics as they can actually accelerate you into Godsend and your other three drops as well as actually pick up a Godsend and bash with it.
good point plus cant you not put god send on your own stormbreath dragon?
correct Proc White means it can't be the target of Any white spell or permanent.
Kel, just so you know, running mystics wont let you play godsend second turn. Its two white. Mystic will give you two green. Just saying.
Temple Garden.
id drop red and go more towards something like this http://www.mtgvault.com/vaan104/decks/beware-the-godsend/
put in tokens pump them up and give them deathtouch
Devout Invocation feels to unwieldy for standard in general so I would personally remove that to have 3x Selesnya Charm and 2x Deicide but other then that I like that deck-list
figured with the mana ramp and that u should have a bunch of tokens this deck is 1 of the few it would work in
Drop Domri. you don't have enough creatures to make him worth while. I would add Bow of Nylea in his place
deck issues:1. Not enough creatures.-also you have 2 creatures that cost 3 mana or less. This is why you're finding that you have to rely on the boros charm.2. Too many planeswalkers.- you don't need that many planeswalkers. And if you're going to run that many, you mise as well run a deck with doubling season.3. You're creature removal is finite and single target. Again, with so many planeswalkers you mise as well throw in some WoG's or Damnations. Infest/Pyroclasm/Black Sun's Zenith are alternatives. Any deck with draw here will crush you, because you're trading card for card. Card advantage is extremely important.Nothing in your deck is super expensive, but what are you doing for the first 5 turns?If you absolutely need a card to win, you need more than 4 of it in your deck... or search cards. Don't underestimate draw and mana acceleration.I feel like the deck is just a bunch of good cards thrown together with no sort of flow or anything.You named the deck Godsend? If you want to build a deck that uses it well, you probably want a card like Lure in there somewhere. White pumps up creatures well, so take a few little guys that have first strike, or deathtouch... or some damage prevention to keep the creature alive, and Godsend will go a lot farther.Any deck will never be amazing if you are trading a card for a card.
while i agree with some aspects. i think your forgetting one big thing. Standard.
One of the most consistent and long lived strategies in magic is completely based on trading cards one for one, control. Incidentally control is one of the only strategies that has good matchups across the board and is universally playable and successful in pretty much any constructed environment.
so why are cards like eternal witness so valuable?
Eternal Witness is only played as a one of in any deck I can think of that plays it, where as removal and countermagic, cards that are designed specifically as one for ones, are almost always played in multiples. I'm not saying recursion is bad by any means, just that trading one for one is a perfectly viable strategy especially if your opponent doesn't have a way to generate card advantage.
Witness is a 3-4 of in a tier one Modern deck.....it is universally recognized as one of the best green cards ever printed...its hard to take you seriously when there are so many holes in your logic...
I neither said it was a bad card or said it wasn't played in Modern. I did say that it is a one of in the decks I could think of that play it. I'm just trying to make the statement that decks can be amazing that are designed around one for ones, not pick a fight with the E Wit fanclub.
You answered a question with ignorance. its not a big deal, and Im not actually a fan of the card, but when you dont know what youre talking about, you should not talk. it keeps everyone happier.
eternal witness doesn't counter removal and countermagic or anything. I'm not in the E Wit fanclub lol. I'm in the "When"ever fan club.
Thanks a bunch for all the feedback. I will look everything over and take them into consideration. Only issues I have are this is a Standard deck. Giving me feedback with Modern doesnt help one bit.
sub shock for lightning bolt, same cost, same effect, 2 instead of 2
Lightning Bolt is not standard.
oh lol forgot about that
Beauty behind Godsend...? Ignores Hexproof and Shroud and can eliminate literally anything that is blocked against it. Shove it on a creature that MUST be blocked and laugh.
I like that idea. The look would be priceless.
instead of domri rade, I would strongly consider gideon.http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=366345
I am thinking about removing Xenagos and my Stormbreath Dragons. Probably Domri unless I can increase my creature base. Still looking into my options. I do like the idea of adding a creature that must be blocked for the Godsend. Should have a solid draft put together by Friday. Thank you again everyone for the feedback!
I find gideon to be too slow. First turn he does nothing but plus. That might be heaps, it might not be. Second turn he can attack, but he isnt strong enough.
Very gooooood manDeck top4
Removed Xenagos, Domri and Stormbreath and added Satyr Piper for the must be blocked tageting the creature with a Godsend. The added Arbor Colossus for a nice 5 drop but may remove it for Elvish Mystics. Thoughts?
hey nice build really like it if it would be possible could you take a look at my most recent build its w/g with arthreos in it thats the title as well tell me if you see something i don't. and maybe help me improve it id really appreciate it . I'm surprised no gods in the deck. i think you should up your brimaz to 4 he is one that has to be blocked if u put godsend on him he will really get out of control. i think helios would be good for the vigilance and 4cc you can't go wrong . id also say get mana confluence up to 3-4 great card for a mana short of color position its better then a shock id rather take one then 2 for playing it untapped. love the primeval bounty in this deck . i think 2 dictate to heliod would be good in here because of the flash . I think deiced should be in the main 2 to 3 its so good. I'm not sure about courser its a great card but not to sure if it fits if it runs well in the deck keep it. fleecemain lion would be good so would voice. archangel of thune i really don't know what to think about it in here 2 would be better. this deck has awesome bones and structure def like it just try to get your creatures at like a 19 count total . but overall its a cool deck. if you wouldn't mind please take a look at my newest deck and see if you have any feedback for me any changers thoughts anything id really be very much appreciate it i also gave ur deck a like to so if you do like my build please like it. just go to my page and its called G/W AGGRO WITH ATHREOS. its not a junk deck its G/W with a twist please let me know what you think. thanks
In my opinion godsend by itself makes even weak creatures very formidable foes, but you on the other hand have already strong creatures like arbor, archangel which will come into game later and benefit less from godsend's power. You have very few creatures too and I am not sure if you can deal with control decks or very very aggressive ones with a lot of small fast creatures. The way I see it if you want to take advantage of godsend you need smaller creatures, preferably with hexproof. Bassara the Tower Archer is great for your built, witchstalker too. they cannot kill you with their spells and when you equip godsend on them they are nearly unbeatable. I generally feel you need a lot more 2-3 drops if you want to play Godsend that is, otherwise if your main finisher is elspeth... well you dont need godsend. Right now this deck is something like a hybrid between the two. Decide where you want to go (elspeth or godsend) and build accordingly.For a Godsend built I would suggest: Remove-Arbor Colossus, - Archangel of Thune (too slow for the purpose of the deck)-Primeval Bounty (very expensive and slow, a bit irrelevant in this deck)- Elspeth? (you could keep her in as an alternative finisher, but taking her out makes your strategy more consistent)KeepCourser of Krufix (will helo you stabilize and prevent you from running out of gas), Ajani Mentor of Heroes (good late game addition, will boost your godsend equiped creature to give you lethal damage), Banishing Light (best removal in the format at the moment), Brimaz (makes you more aggresive, good card)The burn spells (will help you with small creatures, make you aggresive, scry)Add+ Bassara the Tower Archer, +Witchstalker (great 2/3 drops , hexproof, good target for Godsend, resistand to control, cheap)+1 more Godsend (consistency)MaybeBoros charm is ok but maybe you need a bit more creatures (I would suggest fleecemane lion)Sylvan Caryatid is fine but I would suggest Elvish Mystic
Excellent feedback, thank you. Will put it together and see how well it plays.
Removed Primeval Bountys, Arbor Colossus, and Archangel. Added Bassara Tower Watcher x3 and Witchstalker x3. Will see how it goes, Thanks.
Accidentally I saw your reply only a few minutes after the second one. Good ! I am glad you like my advice, your deck is starting to shape now. I believe with playtesting now you will find the small changes it might needs to be optimal. Make small changes each time and test again. I used to play a lot a deck with similar way of thinking like yours, I won a couple of FNMs with that, eventhough I was not based on godsend but auras to achieve the same effect like you. you can look at it to get ideas if you want. Good luck. http://www.mtgvault.com/vardaris/decks/natural-witchunters/
With you dropping the overall cmc of the deck you could probably go down to 22 lands and have extra slots for other things.
Did try that and I ended up with more mana issues then I cared for. I would never recommend running 22 land in a 3 color deck. Having that 2 extra mana just hits the sweet spot.
it is true, unless playing naya which you should never have mana issues.
It seems like you don't have red for any particular reason, you could make a much stronger deck if you veered towards junk midrange, using similar base cards and adding some much needed removal. Standard doesn't have char, lightning bolt or gut shot right now, splashing for burn seems utterly superfluous, otherwise its a good idea for a deck based around a card that I originally thought to be more about flavour, with the God's End or God Send wordplay. By the way, I would love people to comment which they think it is and why.
In standard format deicide is better than revoke existence. I would drop the 2 revoke's in the sideboard and add 2 more deicide.
Great idea, not sure why I didn't think of that in the first place!
the only reason to use revoke is for the artifact hate. but hardly any artifacts are used in standard. I'm not sure why you added the revokes in either
Have you thought about just dropping red entirely? Plummet, Selesnya Charm and mainboard two deicides and the full playset of banishing light?
me personally i like that idea +1 to u
Well thank you good sir/ma'am.
agreed, Red just isn't working for this deck in my mind. dropping to 2 colors will increase mana consistency and allow access to equally useful removal options as Couch312 mentioned. +1
def drop the red i think the deck will be much smoother and consistent
Well since a number of you agree to this then I really should toss red. Thanks for the feedback.
http://www.mtgvault.com/couch312/decks/741347/This is what I ran for a couple weeks. It was fun, but I have since changed it to live the dream with tokens and purphoros.
How did it do when you played it?
Since the meta is now all monoblack, meh. I mean, it was a good deck and I top eighted both fnms, but the meta game runs about 12 kill spells and 8 hand hate cards. I will tell you that a monstrosity fleecemane lion with unflinching courage is the most adorable thing I've ever done.
What are your thoughts on splashing blue? Detention Sphere could be a great addition.
or biomancer wesco did an awesome deck on tcg player on W/G/U
interesting. why do you use four light and only 3 sphere? I like the basic idea and the tempo of it but the built is a little unstabil. but it could beat some kinds of decks for sure.
It has its up's and downs, haven't tried the new build yet. The deck is also based off my current inventory of cards. Could spend the couple bucks and get the 4th sphere.
I see I understand. :)
I would be tempted to go constellation on this. Replace the piper with Noble Quarry. It still has the must be blocked effect, and triggers constellation. Replace witchstalker with eidolon of blossoms. put in a heliod or two. For vigilance, and to be able to trigger the eidolon of blossoms. You have coursers, and all of your removal will get you some card draw off the eidolon of blossoms as well. Might make it easier to draw your way to your removal more consistently, and find your Godsend quicker.Goldenhide ox would be another card to consider if you went that route.
Very possible, I have an enchantment deck I put together and play against friends with it. They are very scared and almost always loose when I play it. I'll think on it more. Here is a link to the deck I am referring too. Still working on a sideboard, tempted to play this at my local FNM.http://www.mtgvault.com/razial/decks/enchantment-overload-draft-2/
http://www.mtgvault.com/variable/decks/rainy-days/ looks slightly similar to my deck except mine is only two colors instead of 3.
Kalonian Tusker over Bassara Tower Archer?
hexproof is more relevant than 3 toughness
as a player of Black, I agree Hexproof is the bane of the Meta. toughness is nothing to get around but hexproof Severely limits the option of removal. Don't ever remove those guys xD
Grey Merchant is the bane of the meta. Hexproof is the answer.....