richter1

42 Decks, 420 Comments, 69 Reputation

All this talk about fighting has me wanting to make a fight deck (sounds like I have challenged myself) and that's what I am in the process of doing right now, so be on the look out for a new deck posted on here in about a week (after it gets some play time so I can determine if it's even worth posting).

0
Posted 26 July 2013 at 16:39 as a comment on stoutarm

Permalink

One more to check out would be reflect damage.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 23:06 in reply to #382525 on stoutarm

Permalink

Thought I knew what I was talking about when I spoke about buried alive earlier, I was thinking about living death. And buried alive would be good to get creatures I want varolz to snack on into the grave, entomb would be another.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 20:15 in reply to #382373 on varolz

Permalink

The Dreadnought is one I was looking at but it's too expensive for me $ wise right now. I just got a force o savagery so I should work it in here some kind of way. Buried Alive would be a solid choice in here just as long as I am not scavenging everything out of the grave. The soulgorger is good for a number of decks that I can think of including this one. I like the idea of adding more artifacts that protect varolz because the secondary function of the deck is to use glissa and artifacts over and over again. I was even considering adding the cluestone for these colors, it would help to be able to draw extra cards over and over.

1
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:43 in reply to #382373 on varolz

Permalink

Once again you have inspired me to build a deck I might not have ever thought of on my own.

1
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:07 in reply to #381748 on Volrath, 1 Hit Wonder of Rath

Permalink

I like blessing, for some reason I did not even know it was in m 14. I don't have any m 14 yet but am planning on getting some soon. Shiv's embrace is another I am looking for from m 14. The scourge and fiery mantle would be the other ones that were the best of the lot from that grouping of cards, I guess I could also add moonveil dragon. Consuming ferocity would be too slow if you ask me. As for the others listed I need to get a grab the reins, I will make a note on my paper list for that one as soon I am done with this comment. I like rupture, it could be good with something like twilight shepherd or faith's reward. As for soulblast it would work with the 2 cards already mentioned or would be good even without those others just so it can be a kill switch for one player. Let's see the quest card is kinda nice, it's a mini furnace of rath for a turn. The celebration is good it could be expensive though, the way I see it is you have to pay to sac a creature and then pay to turn on the celebration ( hehehe you have to pay to have fun, nothing is free). Anyhow, I looked at the door just after I posted the deck and said that could work. What the heck cryptic gateway that is fun on a bun. I see the processor going into a deck with lots of lifelink not so much in this deck. I will look into switching out the ranger dude possibly for one of the ones you mentioned. Rush of blood is nice as well as impelled giant, actually impelled giant could get outta control real quick and would be the target of hate. I like Stalking vengeance used it in my 3 color deathkeeper token sac deck. Brawl is like an instant fight for all creatures, that could turn out either way depending on how many creatures other players have, if they are tapped or untapped, and how big they are, I could have fun with that card give all my creatures deathtouch. I think I see why the cremator is good, early on it would allow you to drop a higher cost creature from you hand that you might not be able to play until late game and it would get some damage in, just have be pretty sure you were going to drop a creature from your hand or lose out on the extra goodness of him coming into play. I am glad you are leaving all these cards I have not seen before on here like deadshot. I think that might go into my reflection or infection deck whichever has stuffy doll in it. Electropotence is a decent card but because many of the creatures in the deck have a higher cost then that gets expensive real quick. You have me doin work, all of that and now I am looking for something that reflects damage. I will look in my binder only and see what I can find. Repercussion is interesting especially if someone were to make a fight deck and I know that's not what this deck is but brawl was mentioned. Gratuitous violence, turn the tables, retaliate, wall of reverence and mirror strike (or something similar to that). I don't even know if the 5 cards I mentioned right there were what you were looking for but they are more options.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:03 as a comment on stoutarm

Permalink

I have only read the first two sentences and I am about to lmao. I think that has happened to you before when commenting on one of my other decks, might have been someone else but for some reason I thought it was you. I will read the actual helpful comments in a minute, let me collect myself. I don't know what you said but thanks for taking a look, I will be critical of your being helpful later.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 03:34 in reply to #382362 on stoutarm

Permalink

Just too powerful, I would like to make a edh deck similar to Frank Karsten's 2005 world championship deck where he was a finalist. It used gifts, I am sure the person or people that came up with edh did not want to see lots of insane decks floating around that were similar to his 60 card deck in edh form, therefore the ban makes sense.

0
Posted 24 July 2013 at 22:39 in reply to #382026 on 56 Lands EDH

Permalink

When I first built the deck the online dealer that I usually get singles from was out of hell's caretaker. As I said in an earlier comment the artist would be beast in the deck. The noble does kinda the same thing as the artist so it would be beast in here as well. I will admit I have been lazy and most suggestions people have made about my decks have not been added, but they are listed so I can go back to them at some point and stitch the decks back together (new cards included). Thank you kmk and everyone else for the advise.

0
Posted 24 July 2013 at 22:09 in reply to #382194 on shirei

Permalink

Gifts is banned. Arcane Sanctum is not legal in this deck, yes it is a land and it is colorless but it produces a color that your commander does not have in it's mana cost. Even if you never were to tap it for the white mana or if you had plans to use the white as colorless mana it would still not be legal.

0
Posted 24 July 2013 at 05:33 as a comment on 56 Lands EDH

Permalink

So I have taken a better look at the deck and I must say good job. Earlier I walked away from the computer thinking why doesn't he add some bring back into play from the graveyard cards but I got to thinking about it and it hit me duh, he wants it in his hand so he can wash, rinse and repeat. Now I am going to have to look for yet another card, the embrace. Since you are using a good amount of demons I would say you could also use cover of darkness and if you have a space for another a card you know I love is conspiracy. And if all creatures are unblockable or if volrath is the only one that would ever be attacking then find a way to add poison to make the kill even quicker. I am going to have to do some serious work to get a volrath but this deck really has me wanting one now.

0
Posted 23 July 2013 at 22:22 in reply to #381748 on Volrath, 1 Hit Wonder of Rath

Permalink

It's funny how things work out, I am currently on the hunt for volrath and was before you posted this deck. Later today I plan on posting a new deck that is lacking volrath but if he were in it the deck would be more complete. I will leave a better comment about this deck later today as well, right now I have to run errands/do chores but be looking for something on here from me before midnight.

0
Posted 23 July 2013 at 15:56 as a comment on Volrath, 1 Hit Wonder of Rath

Permalink

Damn thing did not post the first comment quick enough so I clicked "post" again then I found out the same comment was posted twice. Okay I am gonna log off now before I really screw something up.

0
Posted 23 July 2013 at 14:54 in reply to #374807 on The Zedruu Manifesto

Permalink

If you wanted to flip the script on what zedruu does you could add bribery. If you want to give creatures away you could use insurrection to get them back at least temporarily. And homeward path does kinda the same thing. It's okay I am just giving you a hard time. I has a new deck posted check it out.

0
Posted 23 July 2013 at 14:50 in reply to #374807 on The Zedruu Manifesto

Permalink

Two weeks later you are looking at that comment, lol.

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 15:47 in reply to #374807 on The Zedruu Manifesto

Permalink

Hehehe you should try to fix that. It's okay, doesn't bother me too much.

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 15:46 in reply to #381119 on animar

Permalink

Your thoughts on Teferi's Puzzle Box, I think the ability to cycle through the deck would be nice. It might be an annoyance thought because if you have what you need in your hand to go infinite but don't have enough mana you pass turn and when it comes back to your turn you lose the cards that are in hand. It would force me to play with some sort of arty destruct and I don't have anymore available slots in the deck to add anything else.

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 04:54 as a comment on animar

Permalink

what did you think about thragtusk, you didn't ever say one way or another.

0
Posted 21 July 2013 at 19:22 in reply to #380864 on animar

Permalink

Unexpected Results ?

1
Posted 21 July 2013 at 18:31 as a comment on animar

Permalink

Well I will have to go back and read both again, SotH also has trample ( I actually thought they had the same text but if you are correct then I might have to give SotH the boot and keep the other). Also considering Thragtusk.

0
Posted 20 July 2013 at 03:06 in reply to #378915 on animar

Permalink

141-160 of 379 items