I disagree master of the feast is bigger yes, but gives benefits away and dies to removal.
Permalink
Maybe an Evolving wilds in the sideboard in case you findt yourself stuck on too many of the same type land on the first game.In with Evolving wilds and your chances of getting the right type land is secured.Considered a single Basic Snow Mountain? I bet your opponent wouldn't expect that.
No way... Adding 5 lands would make very unstable. I just playtested the deck it works only a few times, because you only cast 1 card and draw 1 card you sometimes draw land. Drawing a land just stops the combo and loses you the game. The same with grapeshot, it's a great finisher, but it doesn't allow you to draw more cards and also stops the combo. So i'd remove 4 lands and the 2 grapeshots. Also it can be countered by any blocker. So i'd add Cloak of 2 Feathers and4 Brainstorm, to let the combo keep rolling and give the creature flying.
Fuck your mom! Suck my dick!
Why are you not using Nykthos and Voyaging satyr?
I like your sideboard, Well done.
For a budget deck it seems realy great. The Anax and Cymede should maybe be 2 instead of 3. Because it's just a pain sitting with a legendary on board and in hand. Consider some Ordeal of Heliod or Purphoros. Maybe both. Toghether with a 1 drop Akroan crusader it makes a great start because you can swing him harder on turn 2 and gives some board control or maybe a good deal of life advantage.
I'd much rather see the archangel than aetherling. And the azorius charms does allow for some. lifegain. A good way to maybe make the deck more intimidating is Path of Bravery. It would work well with the Archangel and also it does bring you on top once you are above 20 life total. The rest of the deck seems realy great but i'd remove the Advents for some Path of Bravery.
Yeah there isn't realy that much lifegain to realy get it going in that deck. Also the Advent of the Wurm is good but there are better synergy out there with it and with the rest of the deck.
Invisible stalker is for the Cipher spells it allows a shitload of burn with a guttersnipe.And the deck is not supposed to be filled with the best spells. The Concept is more important. It's supposed to be fun to play with without becomming too competitive.
I'd love to get some feedback and improvements :D
Realy great Deck. I could see it realy giving a good fight.
It started out as an experiment of making the best of m14. But i kinda got into it a bit too much, and got a bit obsessed with how this deck could be a very diverse and aggressive standard deck. Any ideas as how i should balance the spells? (control/damage). Any ideas as to what cards might improve the deck. Cost is not of importance.
Great idea. I'd like to post my current active standard deck http://www.mtgvault.com/svendviking/decks/cipher/And also the base for my next standard, starting with cards only from m14 and forwards. http://www.mtgvault.com/svendviking/decks/m14-only/
Invigorate would do a great deal for the speed of this deck, And i've found that phytoburst is a very effective component in an incect deck, because it allows a 1/1 creature to becom a 6, add in an invigorate and you have 10 poison counters in 3 cards.
Yeah would be great to know the exact steps in the combo. I mean creating a deck claiming to win in turn 0. and not proving it seems just a waste of time. I'm not saying the deck can't perform. i'm just saying it's rather annoying that there is no explenation.
Please leave response, i'd appreciate it a lot.
I'll have to give you credits for this deck. Can you make a sequel called 'You're a lizard harry!'?
I made this deck out of some of my spare cards, to see if i could get a deck concept out of it. It should work quite well.