The_MoC

195 Decks, 213 Comments, 43 Reputation

And yes, I do have a bias against tournament players. Honestly though, the only difference is that you feel tourney is the ideal format of play, and I prefer multiplayer casual. The other assumption that the driving force is winning at all costs, while my driving force is drinking with my friends and coming up with strange and interesting stuff. I'm just glad that magic isn't so limited.

2
Posted 14 March 2015 at 19:53 in reply to #541555 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

Man you really do have a hard time looking at this game from any point of view that's not your own, don't you?
I've got roughly 30 or so active decks at a time. Instead of "practicing" playing one over and over again, I bounce around between them randomly, depending on whatever I feel like playing. Probably have roughly the same amount of play time per week as a spike with his one deck, minus the countless dry runs of theoretical hands that might come up. If you built your deck, you should have a pretty damn good idea of how it plays. This practice dry run stuff is the outcome of net-decking. Build something that everyone says is good and now you wanna figure out why? Is that the driving force?

2
Posted 14 March 2015 at 19:41 in reply to #541555 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

It's awesome, because I was just brainstorming with my old roommate about doing one of these. It'd be like one of those old "choose your adventure" books that were popular when I was a kid.
Would you like to..
A- Go through the door - turn to page 57 - die a horrible painful death
B- leave it and continue down the hallway - turn to page 154 - die an excruciatingly painful death

Talked about naming it Choose Your Destiny
Or some other such nonsense

1
Posted 14 March 2015 at 19:31 in reply to #540810 on Good luck.

Permalink

Uh ohs. Fun Drainer 2000 activated.

3
Posted 14 March 2015 at 19:20 in reply to #541555 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

Mostly it's the net-decking that bothers me. If you trounce me with a deck of your own design, then hey, good on you. But killing me with someone else's deck? I don't see that as a win for you. Credit where credit is due.
Spikes are the min/maxers of magic. plus they usually have horrid personalities, so nobody wants to play with them anyway. They have a unique skill in draining all of the fun out of the game.

3
Posted 14 March 2015 at 19:19 in reply to #541555 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

Dont bother Couch, dude's just a negative Nancy. If it's not made for tournament players, he regards it as utter nonsense. Ironic, I know.

4
Posted 14 March 2015 at 19:11 in reply to #541555 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

Blazing Salvo if you're really trying to make them kill themselves by making bad choices.

1
Posted 14 March 2015 at 09:00 in reply to #540810 on Good luck.

Permalink

I second the Staggershock motion over Bump in the Night any day. Granted, since it's damage, it can be prevented, but the fact that its an ascension turn on by itself more than makes up for it.

0
Posted 14 March 2015 at 08:56 in reply to #541052 on Bloodchief's Mind Torture

Permalink

Why go one sided? Boros Reckoner, stuffy doll, phytohydra if you wanna go naya. Spitemare.. all sorts of fun stuff.
Basically do this http://www.mtgvault.com/themoc/decks/budget-global-burn/
And take it out of budget.

0
Posted 14 March 2015 at 01:51 in reply to #541386 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

I like the bridge! That would go great with a Madness deck. And yea, the synergy with Guiltfeeder is nuts. I've got a Noetic Scales discard deck in the works that I'm loving the concept of, just need to get the finer details worked out. Guiltfeeder may not be a bad addition to that either.

1
Posted 13 March 2015 at 20:22 in reply to #541247 on Budget Multiplayer Discard

Permalink

Honestly, attributing yourself as a Spike in a card game is setting yourself up for disappointment. If you put so much stock into winning every time at all costs, you're gonna rage out every time you get mana screwed, or pull no creatures. There's an element of chance in this game, you can't take it seriously and make it out alive every time. Statistics are against you.

1
Posted 13 March 2015 at 19:07 in reply to #541354 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

That's disconcerting.. You in the wrong neighborhood, foo!

1
Posted 13 March 2015 at 19:01 in reply to #541354 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

I dunno, you tell me. You're the one posting on the topic. If you truly didn't care, you wouldn't be here.

4
Posted 13 March 2015 at 18:53 in reply to #541354 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

Thanks everyone. I feel that justice was served at that Time Spiral Pre-release tournanent. As for my local tourney scene, I'm not sure what the player base is like, but I assume the tourney crowd can't all be people of that caliber.
A-1
B-3
C-4

2
Posted 13 March 2015 at 17:31 in reply to #541266 on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

Be careful, as Drgn made an excellent example, this deck garners a lot of hate. Expect multiple kill/burn spells coming your way early game. I don't recommend doing any 1v1 with it, just too slow to set up.

0
Posted 13 March 2015 at 17:24 in reply to #372647 on Don't Touch Me.

Permalink

I must admit, I lean pretty heavily to the Johnny side of things. However, that's mostly attributed to the format I play. I exclusively play multiplayer, 4 man+ free-for-all, and these cute little tourney decks don't cut the mustard outside of 1v1. I used to frequent the tourney scene long ago (invasion-ravnica blocks) but I've found that most tournament players annoy the hell out of me. Actually the main reason I stopped playing tourney was because I superman punched a dude across the table at a pre-release, which, understandably, got me kicked out. But really, sitting across from a guy who constantly says "say go" your entire turn is only going to work on the timid nerds. I'm not that breed of nerd, as he found out. Not trying to downplay the importance of the 1v1 tournament meta, just explaining that it's not my cup of tea.
As for 'free' lifegain, using original ravnica bounce lands in conjunction with life gain lands, or perhaps the expensive Firemane Angel could be an option. Even using the bounce lands early to keep your hand high, making you discard the Angel at the end of turn 2 is an optional play.

1
Posted 13 March 2015 at 07:32 as a comment on Type of Players Type of Decks

Permalink

While guiltfeeder is awesome and strangely I didn't know that it existed, sadly that puts it at 22.57. The aim is to stay under 20$.

0
Posted 13 March 2015 at 06:09 in reply to #541247 on Budget Multiplayer Discard

Permalink

Beat me to the punch again, North. I was in the middle of constructing a devo budget deck last night. Hadn't considered the Veridian Emissary or Fungal Sprouting though. Consider Mudbutton Torchrunners or Boggart Shenanigans?

1
Posted 11 March 2015 at 22:30 as a comment on Budget Decks: Dragon Lunchtime

Permalink

Ah, I see. I was thinking of only using it as offense.

0
Posted 11 March 2015 at 22:19 in reply to #540540 on Graveyard Fun

Permalink

Act of aggression can be a bit pricey, have you considering Traitorous Instinct, Traitorous Blood, or good ol' Act of Treason? Or are you running it specifically for its option of colorless?

1
Posted 09 March 2015 at 19:20 as a comment on Graveyard Fun

Permalink

121-140 of 206 items