ArcMage

3 Decks, 29 Comments, 0 Reputation

Hmm, are you sure you're not thinking of Cursed Rack, the discarding artifact? The Rack is:

At the beginning of the chosen player's upkeep, The Rack deals X damage to that player, where X is 3 minus the number of cards in his or her hand.

Which is more effective after a few rounds. Cursed version is better for control and LD.
To me it seems you have a pretty decent anti-white defence in the knights, if your friends play white weenie a lot, perhaps just use more of them instead of the Banshee? Cause he's so expensive. Great when in play, of course, but he takes his time. There are of course a lot of anti-green cards too, but that's heavy sideboarding bordering on evil. :)

I'd think it would be very difficult for someone to get 9 creatures into play against a fast discard deck, let alone 9 ones that your creatures can't deal with on their own. But perhaps you could add one chainer and remove 2 diabolic, unless you really like the instant part of the card. You'd have the same capacity (9 removals) but be able to jam another card in there.

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 22:32 as a comment on Casual Heavy Lockdown

Permalink

I like the general idea a lot, just a couple of thoughts.. 6 edicts seems like quite a lot.. do you actually need that many? I'd definitely put in another Hymn, Ritual, Glimpse and Spectre. Always thought Black Knight kicked Stromgalds ass, since the mana to pump is better spent elsewhere. I'm also shocked to find that few use megrim or the rack in discard decks here.. Perhaps I'm just old fashioned, but discard decks without them rackies just doesn't rhyme with me, even if the killing concept here seems to be the milling. I'd also swap the Banshees for something cheaper, like Doomsday Specter or Blizzard Specter. Sure, that would give you a weaker creature base, but you'd be able to boomerang (with blizzard) things to make your opponent discard with spells.

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 21:46 as a comment on Casual Heavy Lockdown

Permalink

Or just put at least one more Test of Endurance into the deck..

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 21:11 as a comment on Life Gain/Drain

Permalink

I still don't really see the point of Bond of Agony, why not use Consume Spirit or Death Grasp? Sure, damage can be prevented, but if you play a prevention deck, then sideboard the bonds. There are a lot of cards that give you great benefits from a high life total, although most of them are quite expensive to play (something I dislike very much), Serra Avtar with lifelink is funny of course. Celestial Convergence and Æther Snap makes for a nine mana instant (well, almost) win.

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 21:09 as a comment on Life Gain/Drain

Permalink

I decided to like this one, although I'd probably change some cards.. Like *ehrm* taking out 3 tutors.. ;-)

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 20:45 as a comment on exponential thaumaturgist

Permalink

Seems kinda risky, but I bet it works against creature based decks. Otherwise you're just couterspelling, gaining control of things that don't belong in your deck and hoping a couple of 4/4 creatures will do the trick.

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 20:35 as a comment on Whats yours is mine.

Permalink

Looks good, though I'm not sure what the point of Memory Lapse is? Surely there must be better things to counter with for 1U?

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 14:19 as a comment on Black/blue Mill

Permalink

Expensive, slow and multicolored with only basic lands. I would say - back to the drawing table, sorry.

0
Posted 11 June 2009 at 03:44 as a comment on Good deck??

Permalink

Yeah, put 4 fanatics in the sideboard for now, against some fast decks they could be useful. But I feel I have the anti-creature burn to fend off most invading hordes. Pyroclasm will take out most fast, small ones and when the furnace is in play, it'll be a piece of cake. All I need then is 9 new cards and the untapping of all my lands and I'll be fine, hahah!

0
Posted 10 June 2009 at 00:17 as a comment on Stuff it!

Permalink

Freaky. But correct me if I'm wrong, this is a 5 card (minimum) combo, right?

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 23:40 as a comment on Prosperous Accord

Permalink

Looks good, especially considering the budget. :) Not a big fan of lands that come into play tapped, myself. But if it works for you, hey.

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 23:28 as a comment on Exalted Weenie

Permalink

Lotus petal is legal in legacy, but this one is clearly vintage, so yeah. But I love the basic concept, as I love most turn 1 wins.

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 22:46 as a comment on dragonstorm

Permalink

It looks way to slow. Especially since you put some legacy cards in the deck.. No mana producing instants (Blood Pet's doesn't count) and lots of CMC 4+ cards.

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 22:34 as a comment on suicide my side

Permalink

Also, as long as this deck is legacy, why not include Serra's Sanctum? Hahah..

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 18:46 as a comment on The Disenchanted Evening

Permalink

Looks good, and kudos for owning the deck, but so many of the cards in it is restricted or banned in different tournament formats. I don't know how you and your friends play, but 4 Mana Vault's and 4 D.T.'s?

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 16:06 as a comment on dragonstorm

Permalink

since basically any direct damage spell is enough to kill once the doll and the furnace is in play, really no need for enchanting the poor bastard.

Electrostatic = 16 damage
Crushing Pain = 24 damage

etc

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 15:46 as a comment on Stuff it!

Permalink

thanks, I think I'll make room for those.. Still learning all the new cards.

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 15:40 as a comment on Stuff it!

Permalink

why not living end/living death?

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 15:38 as a comment on Reanimator

Permalink

Do you actually have 4 GoM's? That would be impressive.

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 15:33 as a comment on Lava Flow

Permalink

Furnace of Rath + Stuffy Doll + Crushing Pain = 28 damage

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 11:32 as a comment on Voodidoo

Permalink

1-20 of 29 items

1 2 Last