i dont understand why captivating vampire is even in this deck, you have a total of 8 vampires in the entire deck, his second ability is useless, and vampire nighthawk is far better for simply being a cockblock and it comes with lifegain.
Permalink
i dont understand why your commenting on this but, atleast you have a brain, and this was for a deck challenge to give extract ideas, i didnt actually make the deck or youd see my sideboard.
thats ONE card from black or white, not worth of going green/white now is it?
doran is about they only amazing treefolk from white or black, there are quite a few ways to drop him without actually splashing white or black, and i used to do this, however i found it unnecessary.
that, and he needs to bounce the land up 2 more, to 18 total. 16 is reserved for decks with creatures like llanowar elves or 1 drop decks, looks fairy good though not bad.
captivating vampire, overrated, though i wouldnt expect you to understand this when you suggested nocturnus to a t2 deck.
and cards that arent even green or red for that matter.
take this guy for instance, he reads T2 but chooses to suggest cards that are clearly not in T2
eh? people with brains still hang out on this website? what? impossible! lately its been idiots who only think they know what they are talking about.
oh i caught one of my own idiotic statements, im sorry there are zero cards in this deck that are affected by artifacts, no need for the sideboard. it was just a stupid statement thru and thru i guess i gave you too much credit
i should also point out how obvious you have made it that you did not realize what purpose the lands served, and how you tried to change the subject to focus on weaknesses of the deck, that exist in every deck ever made, clearly outclassed, im finding this amusing please continue if you are able.
k, your idiocy needs a true bashing, so i will make you feel like a flea heres where i tell you about every idiotic statement you have said thus far. Deck shuffle: how would i know i need a "deck shuffle" if i dont even know what my next card is? Evolving Wilds and terramorphic expanse: extract has already explained this in a far kinder way than i would for you right now. Spreading seas or any form of a merfolk deck: i cant even possibly understand why a creature based deck is going to have an unfair advantage on a deck that emphasizes on removing creatures. and while im on this subject, are you going to tell me every single deck youve ever made was never weak to another kind of deck? like really how retarded of a statement is this? mind funeral: really? this deck is standard an infant that knows the rule set can figure this out an artifact deck: come on dude there is only ONE card that is even affected by this and that can easily be cleansed by a sideboard the only thing i can agree with as been said before is it is weak to a control deck, but as ive already said are you going to claim you can make a deck with zero weaknesses? get over yourself and stop attempting to sound smart, it CLEARLY is not working.
i still dont quite agree with you because of extremely complicated circumstances (and many of them) however if you dont want the discards im sure youll sideboard it for something else
you dont have to take damage from a creature before you kill it with royal assassin, creature abilitys are treated as instants (e.x. your opponent taps his army to hit you now, before the damage step you tap royal assassin and go haha), and as far as miasma not being "viable" you just named 2 green cards that make it "not viable" if your going to go as far to say this you may as well say all discard cards are not viable. and then as far as the vengevines go, your opponnent needs more than one creature in his hand for him to be able to use vengevines ability, im not saying this deck will KEEP your opponent at zero cards, but bear min it will stop a green deck in its tracks easily.
rofl, another complete scrub trying to act tough, ill give you 10 seconds counted by these periods to realize why marsh flats and verdant catacombs are effective . . . . . . . . . . times up, you still fail (probally) its something called deck thinning, each time i play one of these lands i dropped (basically) 2 out of the card pool, allowing me to grab less land and far more useful cards, and then you probally should read grim discovery, this also allows the card to become somewhat of a mana accelerator, next time you even attempt to comment on my decks please realize i have far more experience than you.
theres a few other quality deck builders on here, D_Roc is one i respect
take a look at this deck if you feel like making a pure suicidal variant http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=82329
also if your looking for tournament quality decks, most of my decks id go to a tournament with, particularly most of my mono white decks id check them out and make one with your own spin.
sorry to hear that, but assuming your playing in tournaments this deck isnt going to make it there very well at all, because kamigawa cycle is in the legacy and vintage formats, meaning people are running 8 years worth of magic cards in their decks and can make much more brutal decks because of this, just something to think about, regardless this looks like a fun deck to play with some friends.
doesnt look terrible, only a couple suggestions, drop elixir of immortality, and a couple lands then add treasure hunt x3 and explore x3, you will get your land on the field so much faster, i would also try to get day of judgement to x4 seeing as how your arent running many true creatures, last suggestion is to get all of the manland to x4 if you have them.
81-100 of 223 items