To Neg or not to Neg?

by KJSJ3 on 24 October 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Instants (8)


Artifacts (1)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A -1/-1 deck for modern. Melira + Torment is fun. No need to worry about indestructible stuffs. Thoughts?

Note: Although a few things are similar, this is not Melira Pod.

Deck Tags

  • Jund
  • Modern
  • FNM

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

10
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,200 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

00202118

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for To Neg or not to Neg?

See: Melira Pod. Exact same idea.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 02:07

Permalink

I did throw a little Melira Pod flare in this deck. Melira is one of my favorite cards.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:33

Permalink

Birthing Pod is what gives the deck its consistency, and it is much more combo centric. There are several infinite life combos as well as infinite damage combos, and it has multiple ways to tutor up the pieces of the combo. It won the last 3 grand prix's. If it ain't broken, don't fix it.

0
Posted 26 October 2013 at 16:12

Permalink

Meleria, Devoted Druid, Helix Pinnacle. Then base everything around support for that....

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 02:56

Permalink

The base of the deck is Melira and Everlasting Torment. Then I threw in some Melira Pod flare with Viscera Seer and Murderous Redcap.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:36

Permalink

@Benny_boy777 It would be easier and faster, I think, to just do the devoted druid and quillspike combo. However this idea is brilliant in the fashion of giving that deck some more ideas to fill it out and have a second win con.

0
Posted 26 October 2013 at 18:42

Permalink

is wither the same as infect?

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 03:35

Permalink

Similar.

Infect has an alternate win-con type thing and generally didn't mix as well with creatures who didn't give poison counters to players, as the normal damage creatures would be, in essence, hitting a different player. Wither still deals combat damage to players, so generally it mixes better with non-infect creatures towards an archetype win-con of "damage". However, they do both deal damage to creatures as -1/-1's, and in that regard are the same.

1
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:20

Permalink

tmw30 is correct. As a user of infect myself, I can attest to the fact that it does not mix well with non-infect spells.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:42

Permalink

I like decks like this that do subtle things to win games, and for that, you get a plus one.

My only suggestion is to increase the Viscera Seer count by 1, as they aren't appearing as much as I would like them to. Maybe another MB redcap? They do their job well.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:45

Permalink

What would you suggest that I SB for them?

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:52

Permalink

I suggest the Whip and 1 Anger, to be honest.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 04:57

Permalink

why so much variance in the land base? why Reaper of the Wilds?

I mean, I get what the deck does, I just kind of dont see why you need one Fire Lit Thicket (ect) or Reaper....


please detail.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 06:33

Permalink

Reaper is hard to deal with and it can kill just about anything and it lets me scry 1 when a creature dies. As for the land, I didn't want to get color screwed, but yeah, the thicket (etc) isn't needed.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 12:21

Permalink

gotcha.thanks.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 15:16

Permalink

I need to give you a game of modern! Skype me when you can! Toby, you're mate from the UK!

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 17:56

Permalink

I haven't forgotten you. Glad to hear you are still alive. You disappeared from my fb.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 18:26

Permalink

Yes I had to delete it for my important exams :( You on skype?

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 18:48

Permalink

Ah, yeah. I don't have this deck though.

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 18:49

Permalink

IAh ok, message me on skyp anyway, I'm in a game now!!

0
Posted 25 October 2013 at 18:57

Permalink

jojothemighty has deleted this comment.

Posted 25 October 2013 at 17:58

Permalink

have you considered Tarmegoyf

0
Posted 26 October 2013 at 06:01

Permalink

Everyone considers Tarmegoyf, checks their wallet and decides against it! Although it would be a sweet addition to this deck Justen!

1
Posted 26 October 2013 at 13:42

Permalink

Got any spare Tarmegoyfs that I can have Toby? :)

1
Posted 26 October 2013 at 16:55

Permalink

Ye I think I have 5 or 6 and I'll throw in a Jace the mind Sculptor for $10, that must be asking for rather a lot of cash though!

1
Posted 26 October 2013 at 17:24

Permalink

I'll take 3. So what do you think of the Jace vs Vraska Dual Decks?

0
Posted 26 October 2013 at 17:33

Permalink

Well it's a little like the Elspeth Vs Tezzeret, Jace is a high price right now and Vraska is pretty low, although it should be good, I want to see if they ally a colour with Jace!

0
Posted 28 October 2013 at 08:51

Permalink