Mattmancci

69 Decks, 15 Comments, 1 Reputation

Ya, that angel that gives all your creatures exalted that stacks the exalted, will definitely be on the list. And i've always been fond of using dark depths, but i'd be more likely to use that in a deck with hez parasites, and vampire hexmages. Which has been another deck idea i've been toying with

0
Posted 22 June 2012 at 05:44 in reply to #266464 on Kaldra for the win!

Permalink

I recently made a second turn win against a friend of mine using the manaporphose. The only reason i'm using turn aside is i often have 1 mana to spare, not so often did i have two. But i am considering mana leak

0
Posted 22 June 2012 at 05:41 in reply to #266761 on Blue? Red? WEE????

Permalink

I'm considering removing the delvers from the deck. they were alright in some of the games i've played with it. they almost proved to be more useful then the gelectrodes, simply because this deck is almost too fast to use the gelectrodes at time. Regardless, either of those are going to be coming out for lightning bolts, or something similar

0
Posted 22 June 2012 at 05:31 in reply to #266741 on Blue? Red? WEE????

Permalink

I played it a couple of times against some of my friends, against a very fast infinite combo deck, a ninja deck, and an agro black deck. And overall it it played fairly well. The mutegenic growths are in and are great. And as for the rite in flames. They may go out for something like lightning bolt, or even some card draw. But they did get my kiln fiend out first turn, winning on the second.

0
Posted 22 June 2012 at 05:29 in reply to #266330 on Blue? Red? WEE????

Permalink

I was considering adding in some of the phyrexian mana cards, mostly just mutagenic growth. But the rite in flame work well, either by being an extra spell to cast, giving me more mana to work with, or even getting a kiln fiend out first turn and winning on the second turn

0
Posted 20 June 2012 at 04:27 in reply to #266330 on Blue? Red? WEE????

Permalink

Ya i am planning on taking one out. mostly because one isn't quite enough to use, whereas i have enough knights it wouldn't be bad to draw a second one

0
Posted 20 June 2012 at 01:02 in reply to #266013 on Knights of the round table

Permalink

Haakon is so i can use buried alive to dump him and two knight exemplars into my graveyard, then cast them back. just makes getting fully indestructible a lot easier. And yes. Cavalier will probably go out of my deck.

0
Posted 20 June 2012 at 01:01 in reply to #266012 on Knights of the round table

Permalink

I'm always a fan of deathgreeter's in a deck that involves lots of sacrificing. Nothing like 1 or more life for every creature that dies!

1
Posted 22 May 2012 at 04:53 as a comment on Giving Up All That You Own

Permalink

Any other i can't die combos would be awesome!

0
Posted 17 May 2012 at 18:22 as a comment on I'm gonna live forever!!!!!!!!!!!

Permalink

I didn't...But i do now!

0
Posted 17 May 2012 at 18:21 in reply to #256482 on I'm gonna live forever!!!!!!!!!!!

Permalink

I was considering using those but i built this deck to compete 1v1 against fast decks, goblins, ect. And in that situation Nirkana Revenant and the Chancellor are just worth too much mana to be effective. I mostly use Highborn, Viscera Seer, Bloodghast, and the Fetch lands to deal a large amount of damage while gaining life too.

0
Posted 17 August 2011 at 17:05 as a comment on Vampires

Permalink

The Joraga have helped me get Kozilek out third turn, so they have earned their place And the Splinter Twin are there for either Emrakul's Hatcher or Primeval Titan, nothing like 3 more spawn, or better yet 4 more land a turn!

0
Posted 22 July 2011 at 22:17 as a comment on Rise of the Eldrazi

Permalink

Have you considered Kalastria Highborn?

0
Posted 22 July 2011 at 17:47 as a comment on Vampire_Perfection

Permalink