tshufelt

43 Decks, 77 Comments, 13 Reputation

I have no black in this deck either....

0
Posted 04 December 2015 at 18:03 in reply to #568581 on Titanic Mastery

Permalink

Check out my Ascension deck or some of my other earlier ones. I'm quite proud of that deck, it's modern-legal and you can win turn three.

0
Posted 03 December 2015 at 19:41 in reply to #569207 on Rats!

Permalink

I've thought about adding that actually. At one point there was some black splashed in but I decided to take it out because it worked better for the mechanic. Life gain seemed a rather moot point if I could just kill my opponent faster.

0
Posted 03 December 2015 at 19:40 in reply to #569206 on Om Nom

Permalink

Updated it, thanks for the suggestions!

0
Posted 03 December 2015 at 19:34 in reply to #569207 on Rats!

Permalink

Interesting. Idk about 5, though.

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 19:17 in reply to #568581 on Titanic Mastery

Permalink

I just added Signal the Clans and Idyllic Tutor to hopefully speed it up a bit.

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 17:30 in reply to #568581 on Titanic Mastery

Permalink

I find it kind of ironic that it's a slow deck considering everything costs 4 or less haha

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 17:16 in reply to #568581 on Titanic Mastery

Permalink

Man, I wish. I've been racking my brain for ways to make it faster but haven't found the solution yet. You can however get the secondary combo out by turn 4 which is pretty dope.

0
Posted 25 November 2015 at 17:16 in reply to #568581 on Titanic Mastery

Permalink

This is pretty similar to my Ascension deck, but I must say that there are some spells in here that don't do much for the mechanic. Wound Reflection is far too expensive and Megrim has no effect as you aren't making people discard in anyway.

0
Posted 24 November 2015 at 17:32 as a comment on Black Ascension

Permalink

Is Early Harvest modern legal?

0
Posted 23 November 2015 at 15:18 as a comment on Budget Decks: 420 Soulbond

Permalink

Is Early Harvest modern legal?

0
Posted 23 November 2015 at 15:16 as a comment on Budget Decks: 420 Soulbond

Permalink

That being said, I do respect Northy a whole bunch and understand the point of building for other people. I just think that if you already have the idea and experience building, you should probably build it yourself.

0
Posted 23 November 2015 at 15:08 in reply to #568370 on Budget Decks: Landfall Value

Permalink

I kind of agree with Umoonpuca on this one. I've been building decks for a long time and once I get an idea to start one that's usually it, I'll just build the entire thing all at once. I can't see the point in asking for someone to start it for you, especially if your only goal is to screw with the build they do. Deck building is an art that shouldn't be outsourced to someone else in the hopes that you can improve on what they do later, it's something you must do alone or it's not truly 'your' deck. As if gatherer and other card searches are that hard to use, I can build a deck in a half hour sometimes.

0
Posted 23 November 2015 at 15:06 in reply to #568370 on Budget Decks: Landfall Value

Permalink

It would be in most cases, but the point of this deck is to fill the graveyard as much as possible so you can swing with a big creature.

0
Posted 22 November 2015 at 03:26 in reply to #568328 on Colby's Self-Mill

Permalink

Not at all, I actually incorporated what you said into the changes I made. I added figure of destiny who can use the mana during upkeep, more burn spells and brute strength because they utilize Braid of Fire.

1
Posted 17 November 2015 at 17:33 in reply to #567964 on What Land?

Permalink

I like the semantic trickery, well played.

0
Posted 17 November 2015 at 16:43 in reply to #567921 on What Land?

Permalink

Nowhere does it state that you have to use the mana that it produces, though it does happen on your upkeep. Mana burn isn't a thing anymore if you hadn't heard.... and the mana does empty at the end of the phase but the upkeep states that I have to produce the mana, not necessarily use it.

1
Posted 17 November 2015 at 16:38 in reply to #567964 on What Land?

Permalink

No need to apologize, I was just saying that it's a rather tricky thing to make a deck with no land. I realize that I might have seemed a bit curt.

0
Posted 17 November 2015 at 16:34 in reply to #567795 on What Land?

Permalink

For fetch.

0
Posted 17 November 2015 at 04:03 in reply to #567877 on Boom King

Permalink

I'm still trying to figure this one out, but thank you.

0
Posted 16 November 2015 at 15:16 in reply to #567795 on What Land?

Permalink

21-40 of 77 items