Zoakselot

50 Decks, 266 Comments, 53 Reputation

Generally, I'm only going to play one wall at a time. The less walls, the more likely they are too attack. This (hopefully) means that I'll have walls to discard. Discarding that, though, this deck is labeled as casual. There is no way that it could ever win against other legacy (or even modern {or even standard}) deck. The point is that it's fun. If I accidentally discard my fling? Well, that will make the game even more sporadic, which will make the game even more funner (hah! Screw you, grammar). In the setting that i play in, my opponents' decks are just as crappy as mine, but also as fun. :)

P.S. It's actually about a 6 card combo.
1. Wall
2. Glyph
3. Glyph #2
4. Fling
5. Skin Invasion
6. Forbidden Orchard

0
Posted 04 February 2017 at 07:25 in reply to #595238 on Less Budget Wall Throwing

Permalink

Can you elaborate?

0
Posted 04 February 2017 at 06:24 in reply to #595238 on Less Budget Wall Throwing

Permalink

I meant to say one instead of tone, and Moonvessel instead of Moonservant.

1
Posted 04 February 2017 at 05:58 in reply to #594843 on Myr me

Permalink

Dang, this is really cool. What are your thoughts on Animist's Awakening, and Frenzied Tilling? Maybe add another Jaddi Offshoot, because it's the only spell that you'll be playing 1st turn.

0
Posted 04 February 2017 at 05:54 as a comment on Zendikar's Rage

Permalink

Yeah, for some reason, Nykthos totally slipped my mind when making this deck. Thanks.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 23:43 in reply to #595116 on Druid Grounds

Permalink

Yeah, that's pretty good.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 23:41 in reply to #595130 on Treefolk

Permalink

No, I mean you can't win by third turn because you've already used up the attack with living lore.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 23:40 in reply to #595160 on Shenaniganandagain

Permalink

Yeah, you should go to http://www.mtgvault.com/muktol/decks/why-you-should-add-description/ It's a "deck" by Muktol explaining the need for a deck description.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 08:27 in reply to #595108 on MTGVault: The Gathering

Permalink

That's a really good idea. I would do that too, but now that it's changed, it won't make a difference.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 05:23 in reply to #595108 on MTGVault: The Gathering

Permalink

This isn't an infinite combo, right? You just play retract when you have enough artifacts for the win?

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 05:22 as a comment on useless creature,oups you lost

Permalink

Well, what do you know. MtgVault now puts the new decks at the front. Lol, nobody will ever comment on hot decks again.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 04:32 in reply to #595108 on MTGVault: The Gathering

Permalink

It isn't a turn 3, though. If you attack with the Living Lore, then your combat phase is used up, and you'll have to wait till the next turn. Also, why do you have 2 platinum angels, and not just one? You don't even really need any, as you can stop repeating Primal Surge anytime you want, so if you just leave a couple cards in your library, you'll be fine.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 04:17 as a comment on Shenaniganandagain

Permalink

Why the loam lion? You only have 4 forests, so it might be a bit hard to activate. And since it's mono-white, a regular plains would probably better than the Temple Garden. Also, you might not want to have the bounce lands, as you only have a few 3 mana cards.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 03:48 as a comment on Can't Stop, Won't Stop

Permalink

I don't think I'll add any of those, because they either require me to sacrifice lands or discard, which I cannot really afford.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 03:21 in reply to #595136 on Rakdos Nivmagus 2nd Turn Win

Permalink

I don't think I'll add Assault Formation, because it doesn't seem worth it. The only reason why I'm running Doran is because he's basically a 5/5 for 3 mana. Also, I'd rather use Treefolk Harbinger to search for anything, than an only-enchantment tutor. How do you recommend I get trample?

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 03:11 in reply to #595130 on Treefolk

Permalink

Sorry, I didn't realize my deck tags still said Mono-red.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 03:01 in reply to #595118 on Aggro Equipment

Permalink

Sol ring isn't legal in... well, anything. Joraga Treespeaker isn't very helpful, because he only buffs my elves. The duo would work fine, but I don't think it really fits the deck. Although some defense would be helpful. I'm not sure why I would add a beast part to this deck. I'm already kind of running two types of decks with untapping, and druids.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 03:01 in reply to #595116 on Druid Grounds

Permalink

Cool, thanks.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 02:23 in reply to #595136 on Rakdos Nivmagus 2nd Turn Win

Permalink

Yeah, I think so. Since it's possible to get a turn 2 win, it might actually do okay in modern, so I don't really want it in legacy/vintage. But if you do find cards that aren't modern, feel free to comment on those, because they are still interesting.

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 02:00 in reply to #595136 on Rakdos Nivmagus 2nd Turn Win

Permalink

Hey, yeah thanks. I was sick today, so I stayed home from school. I was tired of sleeping, so I quickly threw this deck together in like an hour but I didn't really get enough time to check out other cards. What are shoals? Can you think of any other cards that I can cast for free?

0
Posted 03 February 2017 at 01:46 in reply to #595136 on Rakdos Nivmagus 2nd Turn Win

Permalink

141-160 of 263 items