Fairemont

27 Decks, 411 Comments, 72 Reputation

Ah. Good catch.

0
Posted 09 November 2015 at 18:16 in reply to #567172 on Standard Allies

Permalink

Didnt even notice people were commenting on this. xD

Changes have been made in the actual deck. (:

0
Posted 19 May 2015 at 15:38 in reply to #547892 on Don't Even know...

Permalink

Soulfire is being replaced, but evolving wilds is okay. I can't really gain any benefit from painlands in standard. At least, nothing noticeable. I think I'll probably put in some temples, though.

0
Posted 05 May 2015 at 16:15 in reply to #547892 on Don't Even know...

Permalink

There are two people who run practically nothing but counters where I play. It's so bothersome, because I also run a heavy control deck as my primary, so its just like... a control war, where they counter my few creatures and then we just stare each other down. It's more of a self-mill loss in those matches than anything else.

0
Posted 25 April 2015 at 16:36 in reply to #547156 on Brainstorming: Here be Dragons

Permalink

xD

I don't have Twitter either. The only reason I have neither is because I'd practically never use either of them, even though lots of people want me to get Skype. I just never sit down and use chat programs, really.

0
Posted 25 April 2015 at 16:09 in reply to #547161 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

I don't have Skype, unfortunately. ^.^

0
Posted 25 April 2015 at 15:38 in reply to #547161 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

I think it looks fun. It probably would not hold up well in my FNM because of the ridiculous amount of control decks that would just cancel all the dragons out, but it seems like it'd be fun anyway! :)

Here's one I've been working on for my area.

http://www.mtgvault.com/fairemont/decks/fnm-metawrecker/

0
Posted 25 April 2015 at 13:30 as a comment on Brainstorming: Here be Dragons

Permalink

It was a horrible mistake! :(

1
Posted 03 April 2015 at 11:14 in reply to #544174 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

Oops on the land. xD

0
Posted 03 April 2015 at 02:26 in reply to #544172 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

Jessiiie! I just put together a new standard deck... Was wondering if you'd take a peek at it, yeah? :P

http://www.mtgvault.com/fairemont/decks/fnm-metawrecker/

0
Posted 02 April 2015 at 16:25 as a comment on Dragons of Tarkir

Permalink

Great deckname! XD


Don't suppose I could convince my good buddy Gothy to take a peek at one of my new decks, yeah? :P

http://www.mtgvault.com/fairemont/decks/fnm-metawrecker/

0
Posted 02 April 2015 at 16:25 as a comment on Squirting Elfgasm

Permalink

Northy, don't suppose I could convince you to take a peek at a particular deck I put together...

http://www.mtgvault.com/fairemont/decks/fnm-metawrecker/

^.^!

0
Posted 02 April 2015 at 16:24 as a comment on Budget EDH: Hunger of Varolz

Permalink

Oh dear... Such a scary deck for 4$!

0
Posted 02 April 2015 at 16:23 in reply to #543932 on Budget EDH: Hunger of Varolz

Permalink

Its not terrible, but... for my meta, it is bad.

0
Posted 31 March 2015 at 21:23 in reply to #543812 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

I considered both rabble master and mantis rider. I did not select either of them for various reasons.

And no, no list. Its bad, though. I get last basically every time.

0
Posted 31 March 2015 at 21:09 in reply to #543812 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

Do you have any thoughts on it?

I normally post my results of playtesting in controlled situations (me vs myself) and in a more normal situation (me vs another person) to give an idea of how it performs once I get a chance.

0
Posted 31 March 2015 at 18:03 in reply to #543812 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

I have not tested this yet. I was playing a janky jeskai deck. I'm going to proxy this and take it to play it this Friday. I think it looks good on paper, though.

0
Posted 31 March 2015 at 16:34 in reply to #543812 on FNM Meta-Wrecker

Permalink

Well, I understand that there are high prices on Modern decks. My primary Modern deck is 600-700$. I just think that this one has a few too many weaknesses and not enough win-cons to be something I'd strive to get, but that's just me.

Granted, without testing, I cannot be 100% certain that it would be as vulnerable as I think it is. However! Its definitely a good start to building a great deck.

0
Posted 30 March 2015 at 20:46 in reply to #543599 on Wurms is this real?

Permalink

Neat concept but it feels way to weak and vulnerable to be a competitive modern deck. While it might be something fun to throw at people on occasion in a sort of casual fashion, I doubt I'd go and spend 350$ to get my hands on this. Anyone who is remotely familiar with the deck will know that there are only a couple cards they need to worry about.

0
Posted 30 March 2015 at 12:50 as a comment on Wurms is this real?

Permalink

I can take peek at a few sometime. ^.^

1
Posted 28 March 2015 at 22:58 in reply to #543326 on TL Animar of DOOM!

Permalink

1-20 of 384 items

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... Last